Council for Science and Society. Human Procreation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), 7.
2.
KassLeon, “New Beginnings in Life,” in HamiltonM., ed., The New Genetics and the Future of Man (Grand Rapids, Eerdmans, 1972), 61.
3.
RamseyPaul, “Genetic Therapy. A Theologian's Response,” in Hamilton, supra note 2, at 175.
4.
FletcherJoseph, The Ethics of Genetic Control (Garden City: Doubleday Anchor, 1974), 14–15.
5.
CapronAlexander M., “Unsplicing the Gordian Knot: Legal and Ethical Issues in the New Genetics,” in MilunskyA. and AnnasG.J., eds. Genetics and the Law III (New York: Plenum, 1985), 24.
6.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Splicing Life (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1982).
7.
NormanColin, “Clergymen Urge Ban on Altering Germ-line Cells,”Science220 (1983), 1360–61; CapronAlexander M., “Don't Ban Genetic Engineering,”Washington Post, June 26, 1983, p. A-3.
8.
CapronAlexander M., “Historical Perspective. The Impact of the Report, Spiking Life,”Human Gene Therapy, 1 (Spring, 19901:69–71.
9.
FletcherJohn C., “Moral Problems and Ethical Issues in Prospective Human Gene Therapy,”Virginia Law Review69 (1983), 515–46; CapronAlexander M., “Human Genetic Engineering,”Technology in Society6 (1984), 23–35; GloverJonathan, What Sort of People Should There Be? (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984); WaltersLeRoy, “The Ethics of Human Gene Therapy,”Nature320 (1986), 225–27; AndersonW. French, “Human Gene Therapy: Scientific and Ethical Considerations,”Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10(1985), 275–291.
10.
Regulatory Issues. “The Revised ‘Points to Consider’ Document,”Human Gene Therapy1 (1990), 95.
11.
Sixth Report of the Interim Licensing Authority for Human In Vitro Fertilisation and Embryology, “Guidelines for both Clinical and Research Applications of Human In Vitro Fertilisation,” (ILA Secretariat, Clements House, Gresham St., London EC2V 7JE, 1991), 65.
12.
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Fortieth Ordinary Session, “Recommendation 1100 (1989), On the Use of Human Embryos and foetuses in Scientific Research,” 67000 Strausbourg, France.
13.
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Thirty-Third Ordinary Session, “Recommendarion 934 (1982), On Genetic Engineering,” 67000 Strausbourg, France.
14.
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, Thirty-Eighth Ordinary Session, “Recommendation 1046 (1986), “On the Use of Human Embryos and Foetuses for Diagnostic, Therapeutic, Scientific, Industrial, and Commercial Purposes,” 67000 Strausbourg, France.
15.
Official Statements, “German Law Protects Embryos.”Bulletin of Medical Ethics, No. 64, (Dec., 1990), 9–11; David Kirk, “West Germany moving to make IVF research a crime,”Science241 (1988) 406; Hans-Martin Sass, “Biomedical Ethics in the Federal Republic of Germany,”Theoretical Medicine9 (1988), 191–97.
16.
JuengstEric T., “Germ-line Gene Therapy: Back to Basics,”The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 16 (1991), 587–92.
17.
FowlerGregoryJuengstEric T. and ZimmermanBurke K., “Germ-line Gene Therapy and the Clinical Ethos of Medical Genetics,”Theoretical Medicine10 (1989), 151–165; TauerCarol A., “Does Human Gene Therapy Raise New Ethical Questions?”Human Gene Therapy1 (1990), 411–418; John Maddox, “The Case for the Human Genome,”Nature352 (1991), 11–14; a current journal issue, edited by JuengstEric T., supra note 20, contains these articles: Burke K. Zimmerman, “Human Germ-line Therapy: The Case for its Development and Use,”593–612; NolanKathleen, “Commentary: How Do We Think About the Ethics of Human Germ-line Genetic Therapy,”613–619; LappeMarc, “Ethical Issues in Manipulating the Human Germ-line,”621–639; MoselyRay, “Commentary: Maintaining the Somatic/Germ-line Distinction: Some Ethical Drawbacks,”641–647; MauronAlex and ThevozJean-Marie, “Germ-line Engineering: A Few European Voices,”648–665; BergerEdward M. and GertBernard M., “Genetic Disorders and the Ethical Status of Germ-line Gene Therapy,”667–683.
18.
WaltersLeRoy, “Human Gene Therapy: Ethics and Public Policy,”Human Gene Therapy, 1 (1991), 115–22. This article takes on importance because the Human Gene Therapy Subcommittee of the Senate has decided to make a special study of prospects for and issues in human germ-line gene therapy.
19.
StoneRichard, “Germ Cell Gene Panel,”Science, 253 (1991) August 23, 841.
20.
BankowskiZbigniewCapronAlexander M., eds., Genetics, Ethics, and Human Values. Proceedings of the XXIVth CIOMS Round Table Conference (Geneva, CIOMS, 1991)
21.
GregoriusPaul, “Ethical Reflections on Human Gene Therapy,” in BankowskiZ.CapronA.M., eds., Genetics, Ethics, and Human Values. Proceedings of the XXIVth CIOMS Round Table Conference (Geneva, CIOMS, 1991), 143–53.
22.
AndersonW. French and FletcherJohn C., “Gene Therapy in Human Beings: When Is It Ethical to Begin?”New England Journal of Medicine303 (Nov. 1980):1293–97.
23.
AndersonW. French, supra note 9, 285–86.
24.
CulverKenneth W.AndersonW. French and BlaeseR. Michael, “Lymphocyte Gene Therapy,”Human Gene Therapy2 (1991), 107–9.
The term pre-implantation embryo describes the earliest stage of the fertilized ovum prior to implantation. One could also use “pre-embryo” following the United Kingdom's Interim Licensing Authority cited below, or two other important sources: McLarenAnne, “Prelude to Embryogenesis,” in Ciba Foundation, Embryo Research: Yes or No? (London: Tavistock Publications, 1986), 5–17; Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society, “Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies,”Fertility and Sterility, 46 (1986), Supplement, 26S–31S. Until implantation, which occurs from six to 13 days after fertilization, it is unknown how many embryos will develop from a pre-embryo. For an excellent discussion of the issues in this area, see John A. Robertson, “Ethical and Legal Issues in Pre-Implantation Genetic Screening, Fertility and Sterility57 (1992), 1–11.
28.
HandysideAlan H.PattinsonJ. K.PenkethRichard J.A., “Biopsy of Human Pre-implantation Embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA Amplification,”Lancet1 (1989), 347–49.
29.
HandysideAlan H.KontogianniE.H.HardyK., “Pregnancies From Biopsied Human Pre-implantation Embryos Sexed by Y-specific DNA Amplification,”Nature344 (1990), 768–70.
30.
Sixth Report, supra, note 11, p. 40.
31.
CoutelleCharlesWilliamsCarolynHandysideAlan H., “Genetic Diagnosis of DNA from Single Human Oocytes—A Model for Pre-implantation Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis,”British Medical Journal299 (1989), 22–24.
32.
LeskoJ.SnabesM.HandysideA.HughesM., “Amplification of the Cystic Fibrosis Delta 508 Mutation from Single Cells: Application Toward Genetic Diagnosis of the Preimplantation Embryo,”Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Human Genetics, Abstract 1210, The American Journal of Human Genetics49 (No. 4, October 1991), Supplement, 223; Handyside reported the single pregnancy in a session on reproductive genetics, October 8, 1991.
33.
MonkMarilyn and HoldingG., “Amplification of a Beta Haemoglobin Sequence in Individual Human Oocytes and Polar Bodies,”Lancet335 (1990), 985–88.
34.
GladwellMalcolm, “Gene-Defect Tests Planned,”Washington Post, December 31, 1990, p. A-1.
35.
Cook-DeeganRobert M., “Human Gene Therapy and Congress,”Human Gene Therapy1 (1990), 163–70.
36.
Zimmerman, supra note 17, p. 595.
37.
Zimmerman, supra note 17, 608; also, personal communication from GolbusMitchell S. M.D., June 28, 1991.
38.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, April 18, 1979, (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office: 1986181–296:41238).
39.
BeauchampTom L.ChildressJames F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), 120–193.
40.
The Belmont Report discussed three tasks in the protection of human subjects: informed consent, risk-benefit assessment, and selection of subjects. We have added two new tasks, selection of goals for research and protection of the freedom of the pursuit of important biomedical knowledge by research. The Belmont Report focused primarily on protection of human subjects and its drafters assumed that freedom of research was not a major issue. We believe that the by-products of the conflict on abortion, especially in the federal sector, include policies, practices, and moratoria that unfairly restrict the pursuit of important biomedical knowledge.
41.
There is much evidence that genetic abortions cause serious emotional trauma to both parents. More research freedom will increase a trend in earlier prenatal diagnosis that has already reduced: 1) complications of second trimester abortion to the pregnant woman, and 2) emotional harms of mid- trimester genetic abortion. Black's study documented a need for support and caring following abortion or pregnancy loss after first trimester chorionic villus sampling. In prenatal diagnosis, women who suffer pregnancy loss at any time benefit from intervention and supportive care by clinicians and companionship of persons close to them; Bernard Adler, Theodore Kushnick, “Genetic Counseling in Prenatally Diagnosed Trisomy 18 and 21: Psychological Aspects,”Pediatrics69 (1982):94–101; BlumbergBruce D.GolbusMitchell S. and HansonKarl H., “The Psychological Sequelae of Abortion Performed for a Genetic Indication,”American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 122 (1975):799–802; DonnaiPatriciaCharlesNoraHarrisRodney, “Attitudes of Patients After ‘Genetic’ Termination of Pregnancy.”Br Med J1981;282:621–23; LeschotN.J.VerjaalM.TreffersP.E., “Therapeutic Abortion on Genetic Indications. A Detailed Follow-up Study of 20 Patients” in VerjaalM.LeschotJ.H. eds. On Prenatal Diagnosis. (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1982):85–110; JonesO.W.PennNolan E.SchucterStephen, “Parental Response to Mid-Trimester Therapeutic Abortion Following Amniocentesis,”Prenatal Diagnosis, 4 (1984):249–55; MarteauT.M.JohnstonM.ShawR.W., “The Impact of Prenatal Screening and Diagnostic Testing upon the Cognitions, Emotions, and Behavior of Pregnant Women,”Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 33 (1989): 7–21; BlackRita B., “A 1 and 6 Month Follow-up of Prenatal Diagnosis Patients Who Lost Pregnancies,”Prenatal Diagnosis, 9 (1989):795–99; Van MourikWhite M.C.A.ConnorH.M.Ferguson-SmithMalcomb A., “Patient Care before and after Termination of Pregnancy for Neural Tube Defects,”Prenatal Diagnosis, 10 (1990):497–502; ElderS.H.LaurenceK.M., “The Impact of Supportive Intervention after Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality,”Prenatal Diagnosis, 11 (1991):47–51.
42.
GaljaardHans, “Early Diagnosis and Prevention of Genetic Disease,” in GaljaardH., ed., Aspects of Genetic Disease, (Basel: Karger, 1984), 1–15.
43.
BrentRobert L., “The Magnitude of the Problem of Congenital Malformations,” in Prevention of Physical and Mental Congenital Defects. Part A: The Scope of the Problem, (New York, Alan R. Liss, 1985), 55.
44.
HallJ.M., “Linkage of Early-Onset Familial Breast Cancer to Chromosome 17q21,”Science250 (1990), 1684–89; Joan Marx, “Genetic Defect Identified in Rare Cancer Syndrome,”Science250 (1990), 1209; MalkinD., “Germ Line p53 Mutations in a Familial Syndrome of Breast Cancer, Sarcomas, and Other Neoplasms,”Science250 (1990), 1233–38.
45.
WarburtonDorothy, “Reproductive Loss: How Much is Preventable?”New England Journal of Medicine316 (1987), 158–60; HarlapS.ShionoP.H. and RamcharanS., “A Life Table of Spontaneous Abortions and the Effects of Age, Parity, and Other Variables,” in PorterI.H. and HookE.B., eds., Embryonic and Fetal Death, (New York, Academic Press, 1980), 148.
46.
KrimskySheldon, “Human Gene Therapy: Must We Know Where to Stop Before We Start?”Human Gene Therapy1 (1990), 171–73; Lappe, supra note 17, 637; AgiusE., “Germ-line Cells — Our Responsibilities for Future Generations,”Concilium223 (1989), 127–38; RuhHans, “Ethische Aspekte der Biologie,”Bulletin des Medicins Suisses70 (1989), 2080–83.
47.
AndersonW. French, “Human Gene Therapy: Why Draw A Line,”The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy14 (1989), 681–93.
48.
Krimsky, supra note 46, 173.
49.
CulverCharles C.GertBernard M., Philosophy in Medicine (New York, Oxford University Press, 1982).
50.
Berger and Gert, supra note 17, 671–74.
51.
FletcherJohn C., “Controversies in Research Ethics Affecting the Future of Human Gene Therapy,”Human Gene Therapy1 (1990), 307–324.
52.
GordonJon W., “Transgenic Animals,”International Review of Cytology, 115 (1989), 171–229; ChurchRobert B., ed., Transgenic Models in Medicine and Agriculture, (New York, Wiley-Liss, 1990).
53.
PalmiterRichard D.BrinsterRalph L., “Germ-line Transformation of Mice,”Annual Review of Genetics20 (1986), 465–99.
54.
van der PuttenHermanBotteriFlorence M.MillerA. Dusty, “Efficient Insertion of Genes Into the Mouse Germ Line Via Retroviral Vectors.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA82 (1985), 6148–52.
55.
KuehnMichael R.BradleyAllanRobertsonElizabeth J., “A Potential Animal Model for Lesch-Nyhan Syndrome Through Introduction of HPRT Mutations into Mice,”Nature326 (1987), 295–98.
56.
HammerRobert E.PalmiterRichard D.BrinsterRalph L., “Partial Correction of Murine Hereditary Growth Disorder by Germ-line Incorporation of a New Gene,”Nature311 (1984), 65–7.
57.
ConstantiniFrankChadaKiranMagramJeanne, “Correction of Murine Beta-thalassemia by Gene Transfer Into the Germ Line,”Science233 (1986), 1192–94.
58.
ReadheadCarolPopkoBrianTakahashiNaoki, “Expression of a Myelin Basic Protein Gene in Transgenic Shiverer Mice: Correction of the Dysmyelinating Phenotype,”Cell48 (1987), 703–12.
59.
MasonAnthony J.PittsSharon L.NikolicsKaroly, “The Hypogonadal Mouse: Reproductive Functions Restored by Gene Therapy,”Science234 (1986), 1372–78.
60.
MooltenFrederick L.WellsJohn M.HeymanRichard A., “Lymphoma Regression Induced by Ganciclovir in Mice Bearing a Herpes Thymidine Kinase Transgene,”Human Gene Therapy1 (1990), 125–34.
61.
KyleJ.W.BirkenmeierE.H.GwynnB., “Correction of Murine Mucopolysaccharidosis VII by a Human Beta-glucuronidase Transgene,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA87 (1990), 3914–18.
62.
YamamuraK.EbiharaT.KaminoK., “Restoration of Immune Response by Gene Therapy in Mice,”Acta Paediatrica Japanese Overseas Edition29 (1987), 519–21.
63.
CavardCatherineGrimberGiseleDuboisNathalie, “Correction of Mouse Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency by Gene Transfer into the Germ Line,”Nucleic Acids Research16 (1988), 2099–110.
64.
LundTorbenO'ReillyLorraineHutchingsPatricia, “Prevention of Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus in Non-Obese Diabetic Mice by Transgenes Encoding Modified 1-A Beta-Chain or Normal I-F. Alpha Chain,”Nature345 (1990), 727–9.
65.
Zimmerman, supra note 17, 601.
66.
MansourSuzanne, “Disruption of the Proto-Oncogene in Int-2 Mouse Embryo-derived Stem Cells: A General Strategy for Targeting Mutations to Non-selectable Genes,”Nature336 (1988), 348–352.
67.
ThomasKirk R. and CapecchiMario R., “Site-Directed Mutagenesis by Gene Targeting in Mouse Embryo-Derived Stem Cells,”Cell51 (1987), 503–12.
68.
We are unsure whether fetal gene thetapy experiments could be approved by the Human Gene Therapy Subcommittee and the RAC alone, or whether a recommendation would also be necessary from an Ethics Advisory Board required by federal regulation but unchartered since 1980. There is precedent for review of federally supported fetal research by an Ethical Advisory Board. Technically, such projects would not require any use of the “waiver of minimal risk,” which applies to investigative fetal research, especially that conducted in the context of elective abortion. This research is therapeutic in intent, designed to “meet the health needs of…the particular fetus” [45 Code of Federal Regulations 46.206]. However, the Secretary, HHS, can request advice from an Ethical Advisory Board about ethical issues raised by individual applications or proposals [46.204 (b)].
69.
FletcherJohn C., supra note 51, at 307f; FletcherJohn C., “Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research and Federal Policy: A Growing Wall of Separation,”Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy5 (1990), 211–225.
70.
FurmanWayne L.PrattCharles B. and RiveraGaston K., “Mortality in Pediatric Phase I Clinical Trials,”Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 81 (1989): 1193–1194.
71.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance. The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years FY 1991–1995 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1990) 266–863.
72.
MasonJames O., “Should the Fetal Tissue Research Ban Be Lifted?”Journal of NIH Research, 2 (1990), 17–18.