See, for example, HenduWilliam R. and LoebJerod M., “By Responding Quickly and Wisely, Universities Can Avoid the Traps Set by Animal-Rights Groups,”The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 30, 1990, p. B1; GibsonW. A., “The Animal Rights War on Biomedical Research: A Call To Arms” [editorial], Journal of Dental Research69(10): 1703–1704, Oct. 1990. HillRetha, “Protestors Stalk Research Over Cat Experiments,”The Washington Post, June 23, 1991, pp. C1, C6; AdlerJerry and HagerMary, “Emptying the Cages: Does the Animal Kingdom Need a Bill of Rights?”, Newsweek61 (21), pp. 59–60 (May 23, 1988); Scott Bernstein, “Animal Rights Activists Distort Issues,” Journal of the American Medical Association261 (No. 5; Feb. 3, 1989): 784.
2.
FoxJeffrey L., “Changes in Animal Care Policy Proposed,”Science224 (27 April 1984): 364f.
3.
“Animals, Science, and Ethics,”Hastings Center Report20 (May/June 1990), Special Supplement, pp. 1–32.
4.
Hastings Center Report20 (November/December 1990), Letters, p. 43. See also WhiteR. J., “Animal Rights Versus Human Rights” [editorial], Surgical Neurology30 (No. 5, Nov. 1988): 410–411.
5.
See, for example, RowanAndrew N., Of Mice, Models, and Men: A Critical Evaluation of Animal Research (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984), Chaps. 3–4.
6.
See TooleyMichael, “Abortion and Infanticide,”Philosophy and Public Affairs2 (Fall 1972): 37–65; “In Defense of Abortion and Infanticide.” In Feinberg, Joel, ed., The Problem of Abortion, 2d edition (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1984), pp. 120–134; WarrenAnne Mary, “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion,”The Monist, Vol. 57, No. 1 (January 1973).
7.
BenthamJeremy, The Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789), Chap. 17, Sect. 1. See the Bentham selection in ReganTom and SingerPeter (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations, 2d ed. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1989), p. 26. This anthology is cited below as “Regan-Singer.”
8.
See, for example, FlemmingA. H., “Animal Suffering: How it Matters,”Laboratory Animal Science37 (Jan. 1987, Special No.): 140–144; RowanAndrew N., “Animal Anxiety and Animal Suffering,”Applied Animal Behaviour Science20 (1988, No. 1-2): 135–142; RyderRichard, Victims of Science: The Use of Animals in Research (London: Davis-Poynter, 1975).
9.
Buchanan and Brock, Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 197–99.
10.
Buchanan and Brock, 261–62.
11.
New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988, esp. pp. 15–20.
12.
For an excellent explication of Darwin's views, see RachelsJames, Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).
13.
Frey, “Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism,”Between the Species4 (No. 3, Summer 1988): 191–201; “Autonomy and the Value of Animal Life,”Monist70 (Jan. 1987): 50–63; “Animals, Science and Morality,”Behavioral and Brain Sciences13 (1990): 22.
14.
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section 9, par. 2 (London: Millar, 1772), pp. 121–22.
15.
DarwinCharles, The Descent of Man; the cited passages arc found in BeauchampTomFeinbergJoel and SmithJames M., eds., Philosophy and the Human Condition, 2d edn. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1989), pp. 107–110.
16.
Regan, The Case for Animal Rights (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983), Chaps. 7–9, esp. pp. 236–45; See Regan-Singer, p. 111.
17.
“Moral Standing, the Value of Lives, and Speciesism,” p. 192.
18.
Ibid. p. 196.
19.
cf. WhitneyR. A.Jr.“Animal Care and Use Committees: History and Current National Policies in the United States,”Laboratory Animal Science37 (Spec. No., Jan. 1987): 18–21.