An Institutional Policy on the Right to Benefit from the Commercialization of Human Biological Material

Annas G.J. , “Whose Waste Is It Anyway? The Case of John Moore.” Hastings Center Report 1988, 18 (5): 37–39.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. New Developments in Biotechnology: Ownership of Human Tissues and Cells. Washington, D.C. Government Printing Office, 1987, p 7.

Annas G.J. , “Who's Afraid of the Human Genome?” Hastings Center Report 1989, 19 (4): 19–21; Dickinson D. , “Watson Floats Plan to Carve up the Genome.” Science 1989, 244:521; “Who Owns the Human Genome?” Research News. Science 1987, 237: 358–361.

Sun M. , “Scientists Settle Cell Line Dispute.” Science 1983, 220: 393–394: Royston I. , “Cell Lines From Human Patients: Who Owns Them? A Case Report.” Clinical Research 1985, 33: 442–443.

Culliton B.J. , “Patient Sues UCLA Over Patent on Cell Line.” Science 1984, 225: 1458; Culliton B.J. , “Mo Cell Case Has Its First Court Hearing.” Science 1984, 226: 813–814; Stone J. , “Cells for Sale.” Discover 1988, 9 (8): 33–39; Annas, supra note 1.

Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 202 Cal. App. 3d. 1230, 249 Cal. Rptr. 494, 47 Educ.L.Rep. (West) 1031 (1988).

249 Cal. Rptr. at 498.

Id. at 516, Appendix A. (Copy of the Mo cell line patent.)

Id. at 501.

Id. at 531–532. Appendix B. (Copy of the consent form denying the University of California commercial rights.)

Moore v. Regents of the University of California. Biotechnology Law Report 1984, (November): 242–246. The initial complaint filed by Moore's attorney is reproduced in this issue. The complaint was later amended three times.

249 Cal. Rptr. at 499.

Id. at 503.

Id. at 504.

Venner v. State. 30 Md. App. 599, 354 A.2d 483 (1976), aff'd. 279 Md. 47, 367 A.2d 949, cert. denied, 431 U.S. 932(1977).

354 A.2d at 485–487.

Id. at 498, footnote omitted.

Bouvia v. Superior Court, 179 Cal. App. 3d 1127, 225 Cal. Rptr. 297 (1986).

179 Cal. App. 3d at 1137.

249 Cal. Rptr. 506.

Id. at 533.

Id. at 535.

Id. at 536.

Id. at 537.

Id. at 538–540.

Id. at 538.

Cal. Health and Safety Code 24170–24179.5 (West 1984).

252 Cal. Rptr. 816, 763 P.2d 479, 49 Educ.L.Rep. (West) 1246 (1988).

354 A.2d at 498–499.

8A U.L.A. 15.

42 U.S.C. 2974e

42 U.S.C. 289.

46 Fed. Reg. 8366–8391 (Monday, January 26, 1981). Codified at 45 C.F.R. Part 46 (1988).

Murray T.H. , “Who Owns the Body? On the Ethics of Using Human Tissue for Commercial Purposes.” IRB: A Review of Human Subject Research 1986, 8 (1) 1–5.

Bermant G. Brown P. and Dworkin G. , “Of Morals, Markets and Medicine.” Hastings Center Report 1975, 5 (1): 14–16.

Calabresi G. , Ideals, Beliefs, Attitudes and the Law: Private Law Perspectives on a Public Law Problem. Syracuse, Syracuse University Press, 1985.

Levine R.J. , “Research that Could Yield Marketable Products from Human Materials: The Problem of Informed Consent.” IRB: A Review of Human Subject Research 1986, 8 (1): 6–7.