McCormickR.A., How Brave a New World? (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1985), 79, 172.
2.
FletcherJ.C., “Ethics and Human Genetics: A Cross-Cultural Study in 17 Nations,” in VogelF.SperlingK., eds., Human Genetics: Proceedings of the 7th National Congress (Berlin, 1986; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1987), 657–72. Results from a nineteen-nation study will be published in WertzD.C.FletcherJ.C., Ethics and Human Genetics: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, in preparation). See also U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, New Developments in Biotechnology, Background Paper: Public Perceptions of Biotechnology, OTA-BP-BA-45 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, May 1987).
3.
Modell, “Perspectives in Fetal Diagnosis of Congenital Diseases,” report delivered at WHO/Serono meeting, 1985.
4.
ForsmanI., Genetic Services Branch, Division of Maternal and Child Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, personal communication, July 1, 1986.
5.
Fletcher, supra note 2.
6.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983), 44.
7.
Swiss Society for Medical Genetics, Med Genet (Zurich, April 12, 1984). 11.
8.
SorensonJ.R., “From Social Movement to Clinical Medicine: The Role of Law and the Medical Profession in Regulation of Applied Human Genetics,” in MilunskyA.AnnasG.J., eds., Genetics and the Law (New York: Plenum, 1975), 467; FraserF.C.PressorC., “Attitudes of Counselors in Relation to Prenatal Sex Determination for Choice of Sex,” in LubsH.A.de la CruzF., eds., Genetic Counseling (New York: Raven Press, 1977), 109.
9.
PowledgeT.M.FletcherJ.C., “Guidelines for the Ethical, Social, and Legal Issues in Prenatal Diagnosis,”New England Journal of Medicine, 300 (1979): 168–71.
10.
HamertonJ.L., “Chromosome Disease,” in HamertonJ.L.SimpsonN.E., eds., Prenatal Diagnosis, Past, Present and Future (Report of an International Workshop), Prenatal Diagnosis (Special Issue), 1980, p. 11.
11.
President's Commission, supra note 6, at 56–58.
12.
Office of Technology Assessment, supra note 2, at 74–75.