Is There a Pharmacist-Patient Privilege?

Rudnick v Superior Court of Kern County, 114 Cal. Rptr. 603 (Cal. 1974).

Green v Superior Court, 33 Cal. Rptr. 604 (Cal. App. 1963).

Springer v Greer, 341 So.2d 212 (Fla. App. 1977).

State v Mark, 597 P.2d 406 (Wash. App. 1979).

State v Best, 233 S.E.2d 544 (N.C. 1977).

Myers M.J. Ethics , in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences ( Osol A. , ed.) (Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa.) (1980).

See generally 97 C.J.S. Witnesses §252.

Wigmore Evidence §§2290, 2380, 2395 (McNaughton rev. 1961).

Vacco P.J. , The Physician-Patient Privilege: Should The Pharmacist Be excluded? Journal of Legal Medicine 2(3): 399, 401 (1981).

Brown v. Hannibal and St. Joseph R.R. Co., 66 Mo. 588, 597 (1877).

Deutschmann v Third Ave. R. Co., 84 N.Y.S. 887 (N.Y. App. 1903).

Id. at 894.

In re Miner's Will, 133 N.Y.S.2d 27, 28 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. Kings County 1954).

Hine H.B. , Pharmacists and the Physician-Patient Privilege (paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society For Pharmacy Law) (April 27, 1981) at 12.

Green , supra note 2.

Id. at 604.

Id.

Id. at 605.

Id. at 607.

Id.

Rudnick , supra note 1, at 609.

Id. at 608; Cal. Evid. Code §912(d) (West 1984).

Rudnick , supra note 1, at 6090–10.

Id. at 609.

State v Mark, supra note 4, at 407.

Id. at 407–08; Wash. Rev. Code §18.64.245 (1978).

State v Mark, supra note 4, at 408.

Annot., 10 A.L.R.4th 552, 557 (1981).

Note, Prescriptions as an Extension of the Doctor-Patient Relationship, Cleveland State Law Review 22(3): 549, 559 (1973).

Kessler v Troum, 392 A.2d 662, 662 (N.J. Super. 1978).

Id. at 664.

Id. at 665.

Simonsmeier L.M. , Invasion of Privacy, Rx Ipsa Loquitur 10(10): 1 (October 1983).

Id.

Id.

National association of Boards of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Laws 1982–1983 (NABP, Chicago, Ill.) (1982) at 24.

Id. at 25.

Greenfield A. Hirsch H.L. , Pharmacist Liability in Tort, Medical Trial Technique Quarterly 29: 434, 447 (1983).

Brushwood D.B. , The Informed Intermediary Doctrine and The Pharmacist's Duty to Warn, Journal of Legal Medicine 4(3): 349, 351–52 (1983).

Patterson Drug Co. v. Kingery, 305 F. Supp. 821, 824 (W.D. Va. 1969).

Supermarkets General Corp. v. Sills, 225 A.2d 728, 735 (N.J. App. 1966).

45 C.F.R. §249.13(7)(iv) (1982).

See generally Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US. 479 (1965).

Roe v. Ingraham, 403 F. Supp. 931, 938 (S.D.N.Y. 1975), reversed sub nom. Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977).

Roe v. Ingraham, supra note 44, at 937.

429 U.S. 589, 603–04 (1977).

Id. at 602.

Id. at 605–06.

Springer v. Greer, supra note 3, at 213.

Id.

Id. at 213–14.

In re “B”, 394 A.2d 419, 426 (Pa. 1978).

In re June 1979 Allegheny County Investigating Grand Jury, 415 A.2d 73, 77–78 (Pa. 1980).