Using 1990 U.S. Census 5% PUMS and 1991 Canadian Census 3% public and 20% restricted microfiles, this article demonstrates the existence of a North American naturalization gap: immigrants living in Canada are on average much more likely to be citizens than their counterparts in the United States, and they acquire citizenship much faster than those living south of the border. Current theories explaining naturalization differences - focusing on citizenship laws, group traits or the characteristics of individual migrants - fail to explain the naturalization gap. Instead, I propose an institutional approach to citizenship acquisition. States' normative stances regarding immigrant integration (interventionist or autonomous) generate integrated or disconnected institutional configurations between government, ethnic organizations and individuals. Evidence from a case study of Portuguese immigrants living in Massachusetts and Ontario suggests that in Toronto government bureaucrats and federal policy encourage citizenship through symbolic support and instrumental aid to ethnic organizations and community leaders. In contrast, Boston area grassroots groups are expected to mobilize and aid their constituents without direct state support, resulting in lower citizenship levels.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlmondG. A., and VerbaS.1963The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AllenJ. P., and TurnerE. J.1988We the People: An Atlas of America's Diversity.New York: Macmillan.
3.
AlmeidaO. T.2000“Value Conflicts and Cultural Adjustments in North America.” In The Portuguese in Canada: From the Sea to the City. Ed. TeixeiraC., and Da RosaV. M. P.Toronto: University of Toronto.
4.
AlvarezR.1987“A Profile of the Citizenship Process among Hispanics in the United States,”International Migration Review, 21(2): 327–351.
5.
AndersonG. M.1983“Azoreans in Anglophone Canada,”Canadian Ethnic Studies, 15(1): 73–82.
6.
BernardW. S.1936“Cultural Determinants of Naturalization,”American Sociological Review. Pp. 943–953.
7.
BilesJ.1997“It is All a Matter of Priority: Multiculturalism under Mulroney (1984–1988).” M.A. thesis. School of Canadian Studies. Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
8.
BloemraadI.2000“Citizenship and Immigration: A Current Review,”Journal of International Migration and Integration, 1(1): 9–37.
9.
BrubakerR.1992Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BrubakerR., ed. 1989Immigration and Politics of Citizenship in Europe and North America.Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
11.
Canada1984Equality Now! Report of the Special Committee on Visible Minorities in Canadian Society.Ottawa: House of Commons.
ClarkeJ., van DamE., and GoosterL.1998“New Europeans: Naturalisation and Citizenship in Europe,”Citizenship Studies, 2(1): 43–67.
14.
de la GarzaR. O.1992Latino Voices: Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cuban Perspectives on American Politics.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15.
de RhamG.1990“Naturalisation: The Politics of Citizenship Acquisition.” In The Political Rights of Migrant Workers in Western Europe. Ed. Layton-HenryZ.London: Sage.
16.
EvansM. D. R.1988“Choosing to be a Citizen: The Time-Path of Citizenship in Australia,”International Migration Review, 22(2): 243–264.
17.
FinifterA. W., and FinifterB. M.1995“Pledging Allegiance to a New Flag: Citizenship Change and Its Psychological Aftermath among American Migrants in Australia,”Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism, 22(1): 1–21.
18.
FlerasA., and ElliotJ. L.1992Multiculturalism in Canada: The Challenge of Diversity.Scarborough, ON: Nelson.
19.
FrideresJ. S., GoldenburgS., DisantoJ., and HornaJ.1987“Becoming Canadian: Citizenship Acquisition and National Identity,”Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism, 14(1): 105–121.
20.
GavitJ. P.1922Americans by Choice.New York: Harper and Brothers.
21.
GreeleyA. M., and McCreadyW. C.1975“The Transmission of Cultural Heritages: The Case of the Irish and Italians.” In Ethnicity: Theory and Experience. Ed. GlazerN., and MoynihanD. P.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
HammarT.1990“The Civil Rights of Aliens.” In The Political Rights of Migrant Workers in Western Europe. Ed. Layton-HenryZ.London: Sage.
Immigration and Naturalization Service2000b “INS Achieves 2-Year Naturalization Program Goals.” News Release from Media Services. Office of Public Affairs. Viewable on the web at www.ins.gov/graphics/publicaflfairs/newsreels/NatzGoal.htm. Last accessed November 17.
25.
Immigration and Naturalization Service1999“INS Celebrates Citizenship Day,”NatzNews, 20: 1–4.
26.
Ito-AlderJ. P.1980The Portuguese in Cambridge and Somerville (combined edition).Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Department of Community Development.
27.
JassoG., and RosenzweigM.1990The New Chosen People: Immigrants in the United States.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
JassoG., and RosenzweigM.1986“Family Reunification and Immigration Multiplier: U.S. Immigration Law, Origin-Country Conditions and the Reproduction of Immigration,”Demography, 23(3): 291–327.
29.
Jones-CorreaM.1998Between Two Nations: The Political Predicament of Latinos in New York City.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
30.
KelleyJ., and McAllisterI.1982“The Decision to Become an Australian Citizen,”Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 18(3): 428–439.
31.
KingG., TomzM., and WittenbergJ.2000“Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation,”American Journal of Political Science, 44(2): 341–355.
32.
LabelleM., RocherF., and RocherG.1995“Pluriethnicité, Citoyenneté et Intégration: de la Souveraineté pour Lever les Obstacles et les Ambiguïtés,”Cahiers de Recherche Sociologique, 25: 213–245.
33.
Layton-HenryZ., ed. 1990The Political Rights of Migrant Workers in Western Europe.London: Sage.
34.
LegendreC., and ShaffirW.1984“Altering Citizenship Status: Some Preliminary Thoughts,”Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism, 11(2): 257–270.
35.
LiangZ.1994“Social Contact, Social Capital, and the Naturalization Process: Evidence from Six Immigrant Groups,”Social Science Research, 23(4): 407–437.
36.
LipsetS. M.1990Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada.New York: Routledge.
37.
Massachusetts Alliance of Portuguese Speakers (MAPS)19981998 Annual Report.Cambridge, MA: MAPS.
38.
MataF.1999“Patterns of Acquiring Citizenship.” In Immigrant Canada: Demographic, Economic and Social Challenges. Ed. HalliS. S., and DriedgerL.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
39.
NeiceD.1978Ethnicity and Canadian Citizenship: A Metropolitan Study.Ottawa: Citizenship Registration Branch. Department of Secretary of State.
40.
NorthD. S.1985The Long Grey Welcome: A Study of the American Naturalization Process.Washington, DC: National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Education Fund.
41.
PalmerH., ed. 1975“House of Commons Debates. 1971.” In Immigration and the Rise of Multiculturalism.Toronto: Copp Clark.
PlascenciaL. F. B., FreemanG. P., and SetzlerM.1999“Restricting Immigrant Access to Employment: An Examination of Regulations in Five States.” Policy Brief. Austin, TX: Tomás Rivera Policy Institute.
44.
PortesA., and CurtisJ. W.1987“Changing Flags: Naturalization and Its Determinants among Mexican Immigrants,”International Migration Review, 21(2): 352–371.
45.
PortesA., and MozoR.1985“The Political Adaptation Process of Cubans and other Ethnic Minorities in the United States: A Preliminary Analysis,”International Migration Review, 19(1): 35–63.
46.
PortesA., and RumbautR. G.1996Immigrant America: A Portrait, 2nd ed.Berkeley: University of California Press.
Portuguese National Congress1995Founding Meeting of the Portuguese National Congress.Toronto: Portuguese National Congress.
49.
ReitzJ.1998The Warmth of the Welcome: The Social Causes of Economic Success for Immigrants in Different Nations and Cities.Boulder, CO: Westview.
50.
SchuckP.1998Citizens, Strangers, and In-Betweens: Essays on Immigration and Citizenship.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
51.
SchmidleyA. D., and GibsonC.1999Profile of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States: 1997.Current Population Reports, series P23–195. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
52.
SoysalY. N.1994The Limits of Citizenship.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
Statistics Canada2001“Total Population by Citizenship Status and Sex, for Canada, 1996 Census, 20% Sample.” In The Nation Series. (http://www.statcan.ca/english/census96/nov4/imm3.htm) Last retrieved February 11, 2002.
54.
TeixeiraC., and LavigneG.1992The Portuguese in Canada: A Bibliography.Toronto: Institute for Social Research. York University.
55.
TomzM., WittenbergJ., and KingG.1999Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 1.2.1 Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu/.
56.
VerbaS., SchlozmanK. L., and BradyH. E.1995Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
WilliamsJ.1982And Yet They Come: Portuguese Immigration from the Azores to the United States.New York: Center for Migration Studies.
