Inability to recognize stroke warning signs and delay in seeking medical attention for recognized symptoms contribute to treatment delay, thus limiting the potential for intervention and impacting negatively on potential stroke outcome.
Aim
To examine knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs in the adult population in Ireland.
Methods
In 2009, 1000 members of the general public were interviewed by telephone using quota-based population sampling of adults (≥18 years). Information was gathered using the Stroke Awareness Questionnaire (SAQ).
Results
71% of participants could correctly list two or more risk factors for stroke, typically generic lifestyle risk factors. Two-thirds could not identify two warning signs for stroke. While 31% could identify two or more stroke warning signs, there was no consistency in warning signs identified. Less than 50% stated they would call an ambulance if having a stroke. Overall, there were significant gaps in knowledge, with poorest levels evident in those aged ≥65 years.
Conclusions
Survey findings provide first evidence on levels of knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs in the Irish adult population. Awareness of stroke warning signs was poor, as was awareness of the need to call emergency services and the potential for acute stroke intervention. These factors contribute to delay in seeking medical attention following stroke, with resulting implications for stroke outcome.
WardlawJM, MurrayV, BergeE, Del ZoppoGJ. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2009; (4):CD000213. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.pub2.
2.
AdamsHPJr, AdamsRJ, BrottT,Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association. Stroke2003; 34:1056–83.
3.
MikulikR, BuntL, HrdlickaD, DusekL, VaclavikD, KryzaJ. Calling 911 in response to stroke: a nationwide study assessing definitive individual behavior. Stroke2008; 39:1844–9.
4.
JurkowskiJM, ManicciaDM, DennisonBA, SamuelsSJ, SpicerDA. Awareness of necessity to call 9–1–1 for stroke symptoms, upstate New York. Prev Chronic Dis2008; 5:A41.
5.
PancioliAM, BroderickJ, KothariR,Public perception of stroke warning signs and knowledge of potential risk factors. JAMA1998; 279:1288–92.
6.
ParahooK, ThompsonK, CooperM, StringerM, EnnisE, McCollamP. Stroke: awareness of the signs, symptoms and risk factors – a population-based survey. Cerebrovasc Dis2003; 16:134–40.
7.
YoonSS, HellerRF, LeviC, WiggersJ, FitzgeraldPE. Knowledge of stroke risk factors, warning symptoms, and treatment among an Australian urban population. Stroke2001; 32:1926–30.
8.
JonesSP, JenkinsonAJ, LeathleyMJ, WatkinsCL. Stroke knowledge and awareness: an integrative review of the evidence. Age Ageing2010; 39:11–22.
9.
Campos-SousaRN, SoaresVY, AlmeidaK.J.S.Knowledge of stroke among a Brazilian urban population. Arq Neuropsiquiatr2007; 65:587–91.
10.
The European Stroke Initiative Executive Committee & the EUSI Writing Committee.European stroke initiative recommendations for stroke management-update 2003. Cerebrovasc Dis2003; 16:311–37.
11.
DasK, MondalGP, DuttaAK, MukherjeeB, MukherjeeBB. Awareness of warning symptoms and risk factors of stroke in the general population and in survivors stroke. J Clin Neurosci2007; 14:12–6.
12.
SrivastavaAK, PrasadK. A study of factors delaying hospital arrival of patients with acute stroke. Neurol India2001; 49:272–6.
13.
RossnagelK, JungehulsingGJ, NolteCH,Out-of-hospital delays in patients with acute stroke. Ann Emerg Med2004; 44:476–83.
14.
HickeyA, O'HanlonA, McGeeH,Stroke awareness in the general population: knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs in older adults. BMC Geriatr2009; 9:35.
15.
Republic of Ireland Census 2006.Census of Ireland. Available at http://www.cso.ie/Census (accessed 30th June 2009).
16.
MorganK, McGeeH, WatsonD,SLAN 2007: Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes & Nutrition in Ireland. Main Report2008.
17.
BladesLL, OserCS, DietrichDW,Rural community knowledge of stroke warning signs and risk factors. Prev Chronic Dis2005; 2:A14.
18.
RoweAK, FrankelMR, SandersKA. Stroke awareness among Georgia adults: epidemiology and considerations regarding measurement. South Med J2001; 94:613–8.
19.
Canadian Stroke Network and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.Canadian Stroke Strategy: Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care: 2006. Ottawa, Canadian Stroke Network, 2006.
20.
ParkMH, JoSA, JoI,No difference in stroke knowledge between Korean adherents to traditional and western medicine – the AGE study: an epidemiological study. BMC Public Health2006; 6:153.
21.
SilverFL, RubiniF, BlackD, HodgsonCS. Advertising strategies to increase public knowledge of the warning signs of stroke. Stroke2003; 34:1965–8.
22.
WeltermannBM, HomannJ, RogalewskiA, BrachS, VossS, RingelsteinEB. Stroke knowledge among stroke support group members. Stroke2000; 31:1230–3.
JoodK, RedforsP, RosengrenA, BlomstrandC, JernC. Self-perceived psychological stress and ischemic stroke: a case-control study. BMC Med2009; 7:53.
25.
O'DonnellMJ, XavierD, LiuL,, on Behalf of the INTERSTROKE Investigators. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. Lancet2010; 376:112–23.
26.
Lloyd JonesDM, HongY, LabartheD,, on Behalf of the American Heart Association Strategic Planning Task Force and Statistics Committee. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction. The American Heart Association's strategic impact goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation2010; 121:586–613.
27.
SchneiderAT, PancioliAM, KhouryJC,Trends in community knowledge of the warning signs and risk factors for stroke. JAMA2003; 289:343–6.
28.
NeauJP, IngrandP, GodenecheG. Awareness within the French population concerning stroke signs, symptoms and risk factors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg2009; 111:659–64.
29.
NedeltchevK, FischerU, ArnoldM, KappelerL, MattleHP. Low awareness of transient ischemic attacks and risk factors of stroke in a Swiss urban community. J Neurol2007; 254:179–84.
30.
JohnstonSC, FayadPB, GorelickPB,Prevalence and knowledge of transient ischemic attack among US adults. Neurology2003; 60:1429–34.
31.
ReevesMJ, HoganJG, RaffertyAP. Knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs among Michigan adults. Neurology2002; 59:1547–52.
32.
YoonSS, BylesJ. Perceptions of stroke in the general public and patients with stroke: a qualitative study. BMJ2002; 324:1065–8.
33.
PandianJD, JaisonA, DeepakSS,Public awareness of warning symptoms, risk factors, and treatment of stroke in northwest India. Stroke2005; 36:644–8.
34.
GreenlundKJ, NeffLJ, ZhengZJ,Low public recognition of major stroke symptoms. Am J Prev Med2003; 25:315–9.
35.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.What you need to know about stroke. Bethesda, MD; 2004 Available at http://stroke.nih.gov/materials/needtoknow.htm (accessed 14 May 2009).
36.
Pontes-NetoOM, SilvaGS, FeitosaMR,Stroke awareness in Brazil: alarming results in a community-based study. Stroke2008; 39:292–6.
37.
UmbersonD. Family status and health behaviors: social control as a dimension of social integration. J Health Soc Behav1987; 28:306–19.
38.
DuboisS, LoiselleCG. Cancer informational support and health care service use among individuals newly diagnosed: a mixed methods approach. J Eval Clin Pract2009; 15:346–59.
39.
WeaverWD. Time to thrombolytic treatment: factors affecting delay and their influence on outcome.J Am Coll Cardiol1995; 25(Suppl.):3S–9S.
40.
GISSI–Avoidable Delay Study Group.Epidemiology of avoidable delay in the care of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Italy. A GISSI-generated study. Arch Intern Med1995; 155:1481–8.
41.
SalisburyHR, BanksBJ, FootittDR, WinnerSJ, ReynoldsDJ. Delay in presentation of patients with acute stroke to hospital in Oxford. QJM1998; 91:635–40.
42.
KwanJ, HandP, SandercockP. A systematic review of barriers to delivery of thrombolysis for acute stroke. Age Ageing2004; 33:116–21.
43.
MoserDK, KimbleLP, AlbertsMJ,Reducing delay in seeking treatment by patients with acute coronary syndrome and stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on cardiovascular nursing and stroke council.Circulation2006; 114:168–82.
44.
ReevesMJ, RaffertyAP, AranhaAA, TheisenV. Changes in knowledge of stroke risk factors and warning signs among Michigan adults. Cerebrovasc Dis2008; 25:385–91.
45.
KeeterS, MillerC, KohutA, GrovesRM, PresserS. Consequences of reducing non-response in a national telephone survey. Public Opin Q2000; 64:125–48.
46.
GrovesRM. Non-response rates and non-response bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q2006; 70:646–75.
47.
O'TooleJ, SinclairM, LederK. Maximising response rates in household telephone surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol2008; 8:71.
48.
DavernM, McAlpineD, BeebeTJ, ZeigenfussJ, RockwoodT, Thiede CallK. Are lower response rates hazardous to your health survey? An analysis of three state telephone health surveys. Health Serv Res2010; 45:1324–44.
49.
European Stroke Organisation Executive Committee, ESO Writing Committee.Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis2008; 25:457–507.
