With the ever-increasing fragmentation of psychology into narrower subspecialties, the field devolves further and further into a focus on specialized knowledge, answering smaller questions and avoiding the larger and more meaningful ones. It is argued that specialized knowledge acquires its meaning only from an understanding of its place in a broader intellectual context. Psychology appears to have lost that context and perhaps the opportunity for a more significant role in modern science. An understanding of the history of psychological science offers a way to recapture that context and to prepare future psychologists to address the truly significant behavioral problems that face our world.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenjaminL.T.Jr.
(2001).
American psychology's struggles with its curriculum: Should a thousand flowers bloom?American Psychologist,
56,
735–742.
2.
BevanW.
(1991).
Contemporary psychology: A tour inside the onion.
American Psychologist,
46,
475–483.
3.
BoringE.G.
(1929).
A history of experimental psychology. New York: Century.
4.
SmithR.
(2007).
Why history matters.
Revista de Historia de la Psicología,
28,
125–146.
