There are two styles of learning and thinking: ability based and personality based. The former are assessed by maximum-performance tests, and the latter are assessed by typical-performance tests. We argue that both kinds of styles matter for instruction and assessment in school. In particular, shaping lessons based on an awareness that people learn and think in different ways can lead to improved instructional outcomes. We describe one ability-based theory and one personality-based theory and present supporting data from multiple studies relevant to each.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdornoT.W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD.J.SanfordR.N. (Eds.).
(1950).
The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2.
AstinA.W.
(1989).
Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. In
KuhG.D.BeanJ.B.HosslerD.StageF.K. (Eds.),
ASHE reader on college students (pp. 226–236). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
3.
BiggsJ.B.
(1987).
Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
4.
BiggsJ.B.
(1988).
Assessing student approaches to learning.
Australian Psychologist,
23,
197–206.
5.
BowenW.G.BokD.LouryG.C.
(2000).
The shape of the river. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
CiancioloA.T.SternbergR.J.
(2004).
A brief history of intelligence. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7.
CilliersC.D.SternbergR.J.
(2001).
Thinking styles: Implications for optimizing learning and teaching in university education.
South African Journal of Higher Education,
15,
13–24.
8.
CronbachL.J.SnowR.E.
(1977).
Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington.
9.
EntwistleN.
(1981).
Styles of teaching and learning: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers, and lecturers. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
FaganJ.F.HollandC.R.
(2007).
Racial equality in intelligence: Predictions from a theory of intelligence as processing.
Intelligence,
35,
319–334.
11.
FisherR.A.
(1954).
Statistical methods for research workers. New York: Hafner.
12.
GardnerH.
(1983).
Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
13.
GardnerH.
(1993).
Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
GregorcA.F.
(1985).
Inside styles: Beyond the basics. Maynard, MA: Gabriel Systems.
16.
GrigorenkoE.L.JarvinL.SternbergR.J.
(2002).
School–based tests of the triarchic theory of intelligence: Three settings, three samples, three syllabi.
Contemporary Educational Psychology,
27,
167–208.
17.
GrigorenkoE.L.JarvinL.SternbergR.J.DiffleyR.GoodyearJ.ShanahanE.J.
(2008).
The application of modern cognitive theories in the preparatory school admissions process. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18.
GrigorenkoE.L.SternbergR.J.
(1995).
Thinking styles. In
SaklofskeD.ZeidnerM. (Eds.),
International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205–229). New York: Plenum.
19.
GrigorenkoE.L.SternbergR.J.
(1997).
Styles of thinking, abilities and academic performance.
Exceptional Children,
63,
295–312.
20.
HedlundJ.WiltJ.M.NebelK.R.AshfordS.J.SternbergR.J.
(2006).
Assessing practical intelligence in business school admissions: A supplement to the graduate management admissions test.
Learning and Individual Differences,
16,
101–127.
21.
HezlettS.KuncelN.VeyA.OnesD.CampbellJ.CamaraW.J.
(2001, April).
The effectiveness of the SAT in predicting success early and late in college: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, Seattle, WA.
22.
HollandJ.L.
(1973).
Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
JensenA.R.
(1998).
The g factor. Westport, CT: Praeger/Greenwood.
24.
JungC.
(1923).
Psychological types. New York: Harcourt Brace.
25.
KaganJ.RosmanB.L.DayD.AlbertJ.PhilipsW.
(1964).
Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes.
Psychological Monographs,
78
(1, Whole No. 578).
26.
KirtonM.J.
(1976).
Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure.
Journal of Applied Psychology,
61,
622–629.
27.
KobrinJ.L.CamaraW.J.MilewskiG.B.
(2002).
The utility of the SAT I and SAT II for admissions decisions in California and the nation (College Board Report No. 2002–6). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
28.
KoganN.
(1973).
Creativity and cognitive style: A life-span perspective. In
BaltesP.B.SchaieK.W. (Eds.),
Life-span developmental psychology: Personality and socialization (pp. 146–160). New York: Academic Press.
29.
MacLeodC.M.HuntE.B.MathewsN.N.
(1978).
Individual differences in the verification of sentence–picture relationships.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,
17,
493–507.
30.
MartonF.
(1976).
What does it take to learn? Some implications on an alternative view of learning. In
EntwistleN.J. (Ed.),
Strategies for research and development in higher education (pp. 200–222). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
31.
MartonF.BoothS.
(1997).
Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
MayerJ.SaloveyP.CarusoD.
(2000).
Emotional intelligence. In
SternbergR.J. (Ed.),
Handbook of intelligence (pp. 396–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.
MyersI.B.McCaulleyM.H.
(1988).
Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press.
35.
O'HaraL.A.SternbergR.J.
(2001).
It doesn't hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay–writing performance and their interaction with students' thinking styles.
Creativity Research Journal,
13,
197–210.
36.
PetersenA.C.LeffertN.GrahamB.L.
(1995).
Adolescent development and the emergence of sexuality.
Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior,
25,
4–17.
37.
RenzulliJ.S.SmithL.H.
(1978).
Learning styles inventory: A measure of student preference for instructional techniques. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
38.
SimontonD.K.
(1988).
Scientific genius: A psychology of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
StemlerS.E.GrigorenkoE.L.JarvinL.SternbergR.J.
(2006).
Using the theory of successful intelligence as a basis for augmenting AP exams in psychology and statistics.
Contemporary Educational Psychology,
31,
344–376.
40.
SternbergR.J.
(1985).
Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
SternbergR.J.
(1988).
Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development.
Human Development,
31,
197–224.
42.
SternbergR.J.
(1990).
Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
SternbergR.J.
(1994).
Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In
SternbergR.J.RuzgisP. (Eds.),
Intelligence and personality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
SternbergR.J.
(1995).
In search of the human mind. Ft. Worth, TX: Harcourt.
46.
SternbergR.J.
(1997a).
Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
47.
SternbergR.J.
(1997b).
Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SternbergR.J.
(1999).
The theory of successful intelligence.
Review of General Psychology,
3,
292–316.
49.
SternbergR.J. (Ed.).
(2000).
Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
SternbergR.J.
(2001).
Thinking styles. In
CostaA.L. (Ed.),
Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed., pp. 197–201). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
51.
SternbergR.J.
(2003a).
Styles of thinking. In
FaskoD. (Ed.),
Critical thinking and reasoning: Current theories, research, and practice (pp. 67–87). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
52.
SternbergR.J.
(2003b).
Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity, synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
SternbergR.J.
(2005).
The theory of successful intelligence.
Interamerican Journal of Psychology,
39,
189–202.
54.
SternbergR.J.
(2007a).
Finding students who are wise, practical, and creative.
The Chronicle of Higher Education,
53(44), B11.
55.
SternbergR.J.
(2007b).
How higher education can produce the next generation of positive leaders. In
DevlinM.E. (Ed.),
Futures Forum 2007 (pp. 33–36). Cambridge, MA: Forum for the Future of Higher Education.
56.
SternbergR.J.ClinkenbeardP.R.
(1995).
The triarchic model applied to identifying, teaching, and assessing gifted children.
Roeper Review,
17,
255–260.
57.
SternbergR.J.FerrariM.ClinkenbeardP.R.GrigorenkoE.L.
(1996).
Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model.
Gifted Child Quarterly,
40,
129–137.
58.
SternbergR.J.ForsytheG.B.HedlundJ.HorvathJ.SnookS.WilliamsW.M., et al.
(2000).
Practical intelligence in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SternbergR.J.GrigorenkoE.L.
(1995).
Styles of thinking in school.
European Journal of High Ability,
6,
1–18.
60.
SternbergR.J.GrigorenkoE.L.
(1997).
Are cognitive styles still in style?American Psychologist,
52,
700–712.
61.
SternbergR.J.GrigorenkoE.L.
(2001).
A capsule history of theory and research on styles. In
SternbergR.J.ZhangL.F. (Eds.),
Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles (pp. 1–21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62.
SternbergR.J.GrigorenkoE.L.
(2004).
Successful intelligence in the classroom.
Theory Into Practice,
43,
274–280.
63.
SternbergR.J.GrigorenkoE.L.
(2007).
Teaching for successful intelligence (2nd ed.). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.
64.
SternbergR.J.GrigorenkoE.L.FerrariM.ClinkenbeardP.
(1999).
A triarchic analysis of an aptitude–treatment interaction.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
15,
1–11.
65.
SternbergR.J.JarvinL.J.BirneyD.Citron-PoustyJ.DischW.HenryP.
et al.
(2008).
Teaching for successful intelligence in language arts, mathematics, and science at grade 4. manuscript submitted for publication.
66.
SternbergR.J.LipkaJ.NewmanT.WildfeuerS.GrigorenkoE.L.
(2007).
Triarchically based instruction and assessment of sixth-grade mathematics in a Yup'ik cultural setting in Alaska.
International Journal of Giftedness and Creativity,
21,
6–19.
67.
SternbergR.J.LubartT.I.
(1995).
Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
68.
SternbergR.J.
, & The Rainbow Project Collaborators.
(2005).
Augmenting the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. In
CamaraW.KimmelE. (Eds.),
Choosing students: Higher education admission tools for the 21st century (pp. 159–176). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69.
SternbergR.J.
, & The Rainbow Project Collaborators.
(2006).
The Rainbow Project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical and creative skills.
Intelligence,
34,
321–350.
70.
SternbergR.J.The Rainbow Project Collaborators, & The University of Michigan Business School Project Collaborators.
(2004).
Theory based university admissions testing for a new millennium.
Educational Psychologist,
39,
185–198.
71.
SternbergR.J.Spear-SwerlingL.
(1996).
Teaching for thinking. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
72.
SternbergR.J.TorffB.GrigorenkoE.L.
(1998a).
Teaching for successful intelligence raises school achievement.
Phi Delta Kappan,
79,
667–669.
73.
SternbergR.J.TorffB.GrigorenkoE.L.
(1998b).
Teaching triarchically improves school achievement.
Journal of Educational Psychology,
90,
1–11.
74.
SternbergR.K.WagnerR.K.
(1991).
Thinking styles inventory. Tallahassee, FL: Star Mountain Projects.
75.
SternbergR.J.WeilE.M.
(1980).
An aptitude–strategy interaction in linear syllogistic reasoning.
Journal of Educational Psychology,
72,
226–234.
76.
SternbergR.J.WilliamsW.M.
(1996).
How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
77.
SternbergR.J.ZhangL.-F. (Eds.).
(2001).
Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78.
ThurstoneL.L.
(1938).
Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
79.
TrigwellK.ProsserM.
(1996).
Congruence between intention and strategy in science teachers' approaches to teaching.
Higher Education,
32,
77–87.
80.
WitkinH.A.DykR.B.FatersonH.F.GoodenoughD.R.KarpS.A.
(1962).
Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.
81.
ZhangL.-F.
(1999).
Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government.
Journal of Psychology,
133,
165–181.
82.
ZhangL.-F.SternbergR.J.
(2005).
A threefold model of intellectual styles.
Educational Psychology Review,
17,
1–53.
83.
ZhangL.-F.
(2001).
Approaches and thinking styles in teaching.
Journal of Psychology,
135,
547–561.
84.
ZhangL.-F.
(2006).
Preferred teaching styles and modes of thinking among university students in mainland China.
Thinking Skills and Creativity,
1,
95–107.
85.
ZhangL.-F.PostiglioneG.A.
(2001).
Thinking styles, self-esteem, and socio-economic status.
Personality and Individual Differences,
31,
1333–1346.
86.
ZhangL.-F.SternbergR.J.
(1998).
Thinking styles, abilities, and academic achievement among Hong Kong university students.
Educational Research Journal,
13,
41–62.
87.
ZhangL.-F.SternbergR.J.
(2000).
Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations.
Journal of Psychology,
134,
469–489.
88.
ZhangL.-F.SternbergR.J.
(2001).
Thinking styles across cultures: Their relationships with student learning. In
SternbergR.J.ZhangL.-F. (Eds.),
Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles (pp. 197–226). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89.
ZhangL.-F.SternbergR.J.
(2002).
Thinking styles and teachers' characteristics.
International Journal of Psychology,
37,
3–12.
90.
ZhangL.-F.SternbergR.J.
(2006).
The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
