PURPOSE To examine the historical, legal/organizational, informatics, clinical, economic, and policy contexts underlying economic consequences of nursing diagnoses on patient outcomes.
DATA SOURCES Published literature, online material.
DATA SYNTHESIS Nursing diagnoses influence diagnostic-specific patient outcomes and other outcome variables such as length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality.
CONCLUSIONS Examination of the economic ramifications of nursing diagnosis on patient outcomes can be facilitated using standardized language and databases containing nursing-sensitive measures.
OBJETIVO Examinar os contextos histórico, legal/organizacional, informático, clínico, econômico e político que envolvem as conseqüências econômicas dos diagnósticos de enfermagem sobre os resultados do paciente.
FONTES DE DADOS Artigos, capítulos de livros, publicações eletrônicas acessadas pela internet.
SÍNTESE DOS DADOS Os diagnósticos de enfermagem influenciam os resultados do paciente específicos para estes diagnósticos e outras variáveis de resultado, tais como tempo de hospitalização, morbidade e mortalidade.
CONCLUSÕES O exame das ramificações econômicas dos diagnósticos de enfermagem nos resultados do paciente pode ser facilitado pelo uso de linguagens padronizadas e de de bases de dados contendo medidas sensíveis à enfermagem.
PROPÓSITO Examinar los contextos histórico, legal/organizativo, informático, clínico, económico y de normativas, detrás de las consecuencias económicas de los diagnósticos de enfermería sobre los resultados para los pacientes.
FUENTES DE LOS DATOS Artículos, capítulos del libros, material online.
SÍNTESIS DE LOS DATOS Los diagnósticos de enfermería influyen en los resultados para el paciente específicos al diagnóstico y otras variables del resultado como tiempo de estancia en el hospital, morbilidad y mortalidad.
CONCLUSIONES El examen de las ramificaciones económicas de los diagnósticos de enfermería sobre los resultados para el paciente pueden facilitarse usando lenguaje estandarizado y bases de datos que contengan medidas sensibles a enfermería.
AbdellahF.G. (1969). The nature of nursing science. Nursing Research, 18, 390–393.
5194777
2.
AdamsR.DucheneP. (1985). Computerization of patient acuity and nursing care planning: New approach to improved patient care and cost-effective staffing. Journal of Nursing Administration, 15(4), 11–17.3845089
3.
American Nurses Association. (2003). Nursing's social policy statement. Washington, DC: Author.
BakkenS.DolterK.J.HolzemerW.L. (1999). A comparison of three strategies for risk-adjustment of outcomes for AIDS patients hospitalized for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30, 1424–1431.10583654
6.
BellC.M.ChapmanR.H.StoneP.W.SandbergE.A.NeumannP.J. (2001). An off-the-shelf help list: A comprehensive catalog of preference scores from published cost-utility analyses. Medical Decision Making, 21, 288–294.11475385
7.
ChapmanR.H.StoneP.W.SandbergE.A.BellC.NeumannP.J. (2000). A comprehensive league table of cost-utility ratios and a subtable of “panel-worthy” studies. Medical Decision Making, 20, 451–467.11059478
8.
DowdingD.ThompsonC. (2003). Measuring the quality of judgement and decision-making in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 44(1), 49–57.12956669
9.
EarleC.C.ChapmanR.H.BakerC.S.BellC.M.StoneP.W.SandbergE., et al. (2000). Systematic overview of cost-utility assessments in oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 3302–3317.10986064
10.
GebbieK.LavinM.A. (1975). Proceedings of the first national conference on the classification of nursing diagnoses. St. Louis: Mosby.
11.
GimenezA.M.SerranoP.MarinB. (2003). Clinical validation of dysfunctional ventilatory weaning response: The Spanish experience. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification, 14, 53–64.
12.
Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health. (20012004). The CEA registry: Standardizing the methods and practices of cost-effectiveness analysis. Retrieved June 14, 2004, fromhttp://www.hsph.harvard.edu/cearegistry/
HendrichA.L.BenderP.S.NyhiusA. (2003). Validation of the Hendrich II Fall Risk Model: A large concurrent case/control study of hospitalized patients. Applied Nursing Research, 16(1), 9–21.12624858
15.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. (2003). Key capabilities of an electronic health record system: Letter Report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved June 14, 2003, fromhttp://www.iom.edu/report.asp?id=14391
16.
International Standards Organization. (2003). International Standard ISO 18104: Health Informatics-Integration of a reference terminology model for nursing. Geneva: Author.
17.
JohnsonM.MaasM.MoorheadS. (2000). Nursing outcomes classification (NOC). St. Louis: Mosby.
18.
LavinM.A.AvantK.WarrenJ.Craft-RosenbergM.BradenJ. (2003). The National Center for Vital and Health Statistics (NCVHS) patient medical record information (PMRI) terminology questionnaire: Response of NANDA International. Unpublished report submitted to the Subcommittee on Standards and Security on February 14, 2003.
19.
LavinM.A.MeyerG.CarlsonJ.H. (1999). A review of the use of nursing diagnosis in U.S. nurse practice acts. Nursing Diagnosis, 10, 57–64.10633691
20.
MagnanM.A. (1993). A Bayesian approach to validation of a nursing diagnosis: Activity intolerance. Master's thesis, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
21.
MarekK.D. (1996). Nursing diagnoses and home care nursing utilization. Public Health Nurse, 13, 195–200.
22.
MartinK.S.ElfrinkV.L.MonsenK.A. (2003). The Omaha system: Solving the clinical data-information puzzle. Retrieved November 25, 2003, fromhttp://www.omahasystem.org
23.
McCormickK.A.CellaM.ScheveA.EngelB.T. (1990). Cost-effectiveness of treating incontinence in severely mobility-impaired long-term care residents. Quality Review Bulletin, 16, 439–443.2129289
24.
MosherB.A.CuddiganJ.ThomasD.R.BoudreauD.M. (1999). Outcomes of four methods of debridement using a decision analysis methodology. Advanced Wound Care, 12(2), 81–88.
NeumannP.J.KuntzK.M.LeonJ.ArakiS.S.HermannR.C.HsuM.A.WeinsteinM.C. (1999). Health utilities in Alzheimer's disease: A cross-sectional study of patients and caregivers. Medical Care, 37(1), 27–32.10413389
27.
NeumannP.J.SandbergE.A.ArakiS.S.KuntzK.M.FeenyD.WeinsteinM.C. (2000). A comparison of HUI2 and HUUI3 utility scores in Alzheimer's disease. Medical Decision Making, 20, 413–422.11059474
28.
NeumannP.J.StoneP.W.ChapmanR.H.SandbergE.A.BellC.M. (2000). The quality of reporting in published cost-utility analyses, 1976–1997. Annals of Internal Medicine, 132, 964–972.10858180
29.
NightingaleF. (1859). A contribution to the sanitary history of the British army during the late war with Russia. London: Harrison and Sons.
30.
RosenthalG.E.HalloranE.J.KileyM.LandefeldC.S. (1995). Predictive validity of the Nursing Severity Index in patients with musculoskeletal disease. Nurses of University Hospitals of Cleveland. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 179–188.7869064
31.
RosenthalG.E.HalloranE.J.KileyM.PinkleyC.LandefeldC.S. (1992). Development and validation of the Nursing Severity Index: A new method for measuring severity of illness using nursing diagnoses. Medical Care, 30, 1127–1241.1453817
32.
SabaV. (2003). Home health care classification (HCCC) system. Retrieved November 25, 2003, fromhttp://www.sabacare.com
33.
SabaV.HovengaE.CoenenA.McCormickK.BakkenS. (2003, September). Nursing language—Terminology models for nurses. ISO Bulletin, 16–18.
34.
StoneP.W.LiljasB.ChapmanR.C.SandbergE.A.BellC.NeumannP.J. (2000). Measuring costs in cost-utility analyses: Variations in the literature. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 16, 111–124.10815358
35.
StoneP.W.TeutschS.ChapmanR.H.BellC.GoldieS.J.NeumannP.J. (2000). Cost-utility analyses of clinical prevention services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(1), 15–23.10865159
36.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003, July 1). HHS launches new efforts to promote paperless health care system [press release].
WeltonJ.M.HalloranE.J (1999, November 610). A comparison of nursing and medical diagnoses in predicting hospital outcomes. Transforming health care through informatics: Cornerstones for a new information management paradigm. Proceedings/AMIA Annual Symposium (pp.171–175). Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association.
