Research has traditionally concentrated on formal kin involvement in the family business. This study investigates if, to what extent, and how entrepreneurs capitalized on resources embedded in the family, but beyond the formal traditionally defined boundaries of the family firm. Employing both quantitative and qualitative approaches, the study finds that about one-quarter of our sample's entrepreneurial network ties were kin, and that most of these worked outside the formal family firm. These ties provided a range of very important resources, both professional and affective in nature. Such beneficial ties extend the family firm without incurring the typical hazards of external linkages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, H., & Cliff, J. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, September, 573-596.
2.
Aldrich, H., Reese, P.R., Dubini, P., Rosen, B., & Wood-ward, B. (1989). Women on the verge of a breakthrough: Networking between entrepreneurs in the United States and Italy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1, 339-356.
3.
Aldrich, H., & Sakano, T. (1995). Unbroken ties: How the personal networks of Japanese business owners compare to those in other nations. In M. Fruin (Ed.), Networks and markets: Pacific rim investigations (pp. 17-45). New York: Oxford.
4.
Alexander, M. (1997). Getting to grips with the virtual organization . Long Range Planning, 31(1), 122- 124.
5.
Astrachan, J., Klein, S., & Smyrnios, K. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45-58.
6.
Astrachan, J., & Shanker, M. (2003). Family businesses' contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16(3), 211-219
7.
Baines, S., & Wheelock, J. (1998). Working for each other: Gender, the household and micro-business survival and growth. International Small Business Journal, 17(1), 16-31.
8.
Barnatt, C. (1997). Virtual organisation in the small business sector: The case of Cavendish Management Resources. International Small Business Journal, 15(4), 36-48.
9.
Barnir, A., & Smith, K. (2002). Interfirm alliances in the small business: The role of social networks. Journal of Small Business Management , 40(3), 219-232.
10.
Birley, S., Cromie, S., & Myers, A. (1991). Entrepreneurial networks: Their emergence in Ireland and overseas. International Small Business Journal, 9(4), 56-74.
11.
Birley, S., Ng, D., & Godrey, A. (1999). The family and the business. Long Range Planning, 32(6), 598-608.
12.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Burt, R.S., & Minor, M.J. (1983). Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
14.
Burt, R.S., & Ronchi, D. (1994). Measuring a large network quickly. Social Networks, 16(2), 91-135.
15.
Carsrud, A.L. (1994). Meanderings of a resurrected psychologist or lessons learned in creating a program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(1), 39-48.
16.
Chell, E., & Haworth, J.M. (1992). The development of a research paradigm for the investigation of entrepreneurship: Some methodological issues. Presented at the UIC/AMA Research Symposium on Marketing and Entrepreneurship , INSEAD. France.
17.
Drakopoulou Dodd, S., Jack, S., & Anderson, A.R. (2002). Scottish entrepreneurial networks in the international context. International Small Business Journal, 20(2), 213-219
18.
Drakopoulou Dodd, S., & Patra, E. (2002). National Differences In Entrepreneurial Networking. Entrepreneurship And Regional Development, 14, 117-134
19.
Dyer, W.G., & Handler, W. (1994). Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(1), 71-84.
20.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Lowe, A. (1999). Management research: An introduction. London: Sage Publications.
21.
Fox, M., Nilakant, V., & Hamilton, R.T. (1996). Managing succession in family-owned businesses. International Small Business Journal , 15(1), 15-26.
22.
Geertz, C.A. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
24.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
25.
Greve, A., & Salaff, J. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 28(1), 1-23.
26.
Handler, W.C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review, 4(2), 257-276.
27.
Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 40-50.
28.
Hill, J., McGowan, P., & Drummond, P. (1999). The development and application of a qualitative approach to researching the marketing networks of small firm entrepreneurs . Qualitative Market Research, 2(2), 71-81.
29.
Hills, G.E., Lumpkin, G.T., & Singh, R.P. (1997). Opportunity recognition: Perceptions and behaviours of entrepreneurs. In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research . Wellesley, MA: Babson College .
30.
Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165-187.
31.
Human, S., & Provan, K. (1996). External resource exchange and perceptions of competitiveness within organizational networks: An organizational learning perspective. In Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
32.
James, H.S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41-53.
33.
Johannisson, B. (1986). Network strategies: Management technology for entrepreneurship and change. International Small Business Journal, 5(1), 19-30.
34.
Johannisson, B., & Mønsted, M. (1997). Contextualizing entrepreneurial networking. International Journal of Management and Organization, 27(3), 109-137.
35.
Johannisson, B., & Nilsson, A. (1989). Community entrepreneurs: Networking for local development. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1(1), 3-19.
36.
Knoke, D., & Kuklinksi, J.H. (1982). Network analysis. Sage University Papers No. 28. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Larsen, K.T.R., & McInerney, C.R. (2002). Preparing to work in the virtual organisation. Information Management, 39, 445-456.
38.
Larson,A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 76-104.
39.
Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15, 1-26
40.
Litz, R.A. (1995). The family business; Towards definitional clarity . Family Business Review, 8(1), 71-81.
Miller, E.J., & Rice, A.K. (1967). Systems of organizations. London: Tavistock.
43.
Neuman, W.L. (1991). Social research methods. London : Allyn and Bacon.
44.
O'Donnell, A., Gilmore, A., Cummins, D., & Carson, D. (2001). The network construct in entrepreneurship research: A review and critique. Management Decision, 39(9), 749-760.
45.
Ostgaard, T., & Birley, S. (1994). New venture growth and personal networks. Journal of Business Research, 36, 37-50.
46.
Ram, M. (2001). Family dynamics in a small consultancy firm: A case study. Human Relations, 54(4), 395-418.
47.
Reynolds, P., Bygrave, W., & Autio, E. (2004). GEM 2003 global report. Kauffman Foundation.
48.
Rosa, P., Hamilton, D., Carter, S., & Burns, H. (1994). The impact of gender on small business management: Preliminary findings of aBritish study. International Small Business Journal, 12(3), 25-32.
49.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (1997). Research methods for business students. London: Pitman.
50.
Singh, R., Hills, G.E., Hybels, R.C., & Lumpkin, G.T. (1999). Opportunity recognition through social network characteristics of entrepreneurs. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
51.
Staber, U., & Aldrich, H. (1995). Cross-national similarities in the personal networks of small business owners: A comparison of two regions in North America. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 20(4), 441-465.
52.
Stewart, J. (2003). Help one another, use one another: Toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Summer, 383.
53.
Suitor, J.J., Wellman, B., & Morgan, D.L. (1997). It's about time: How, when and why networks change . Social Networks, 19(1), 1-17.
54.
Szarka, J. (1990). Networking and small firms. International Small Business Journal, 8, 10-22.
55.
Upton, N., & Petty, W. (2000). Venture capital investment and US family business . Venture Capital, 2(1), 27-39.
56.
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674-698.
57.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks.Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 37-70.
58.
Westhead, P., & Cowling, M. (1998). Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 31-54.
59.
Zeleny, M. (2001). Autopoiesis (self-production) in SME networks . Human Systems Management, 20, 201-207
