Boards of directors are governance bodies that serve important functions for organizations, ranging from monitoring management on behalf of different shareholders to providing resources. Board roles and characteristics vary widely among national cultures and, within each country, among different company types. Despite such variety, research on family business boards has been dominated by prescriptions and by the lack of an explicit recognition of family firm types characterized by different governance requirements. We argue that a contingency approach to defining board structure, activity, and roles offers useful guidance in understanding board contributions to family business performance. We develop a theory to show how board characteristics are a reflection of a family firm's power, experience, and culture makeup. This theory provides insight into descriptions of existing board choices and prescriptions for family firms interested in starting or adapting their board of directors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderfer, C.P. (1988). Understanding and consulting to family business boards. Family Business Review, 1(3), 249-261.
2.
Astrachan, J.H., Klein, S.B., & Smyrnios, K.X. (2002). The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family definition problem. Family Business Review, 15(1), 45-58.
3.
Barach, J.A. (1984). Is there a cure for the paralyzed family board?Sloan Management Review, Fall, 3-12.
4.
Becker, G. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 419-430.
6.
Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
7.
Carlock, R.S., & Ward, J.L. (2001). Strategic planning for the family business. Parallel planning to unify the family and business. Houndsmill, NY: Palgrave.
8.
Charkham, J. (1995). Keeping good company. A study of corporate governance in five countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
Corbetta, G., & Montemerlo, D. (1999). Ownership, governance and management issues in small and medium-size family businesses: A comparison of Italy and the United States. Family Business Review, 12(4), 361-374.
10.
Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. (forthcoming). Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
11.
Corbetta, G., & Tomaselli, S. (1996). Boards of directors in Italian family businesses . Family Business Review, 9(4), 403-421.
12.
Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R., & Cannella Jr., A.A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review , 28(3), 371-382.
13.
Dalton, D., Daily, C., Certo, T., & Roengpitya, R. (2003). Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion? Academy of Management Journal, 46, 13-26.
Danco, L.A., & Jonovic, D.J. (1981). Outside directors in the family-owned business . Cleveland, OH: University Press Inc.
16.
Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
17.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J.H. (1994). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and stockholders' returns. In R. I. Tricker (Ed.), International corporate governance. Texts, readings and cases. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
19.
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
20.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D.C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. Minneapolis /St. Paul, MN: West.
21.
Forbes, D.P., & Milliken, F.J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489-505.
22.
Ford, R.H. (1988). Outside directors and the privately-owned firm: Are they necessary?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall, 49-57.
23.
Ford, R.H. (1992). Boards of directors and the privately owned firm . New York: Quorum Books.
24.
Gallo, M.A. (1993). Governing bodies in the family company. Working paper of the Research Department at IESE, University of Navarra.
25.
Heidrick, G.W. (1988). Selecting outside directors. Family Business Review, 1(3), 271-277.
26.
Hillman, A.J., Cannella Jr., A.A., & Paetzold, R.L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies , 37(2), 235-255.
27.
Hillman, A.J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396.
28.
Hung, H. (1998). A typology of the theories of governing boards . Corporate Governance, 6(2), 101-111.
29.
Huse, M. (1994). Board-management relations in small firms: The paradox of simultaneous independence and interdependence. Small Business Economics, 6(1), 55-72.
30.
Huse, M. (1995). Stakeholder thinking and the board of directors in owner/manager firms. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 197-214). Helsinki: LSR Publications.
31.
Huse, M. (2000). Boards of directors in SMEs: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12, 271-290.
32.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
33.
Johannisson B., & Huse, M. (2000). Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: an ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(4), 353-378.
34.
Jonovic, D.J. (1989). Outside review in a wider context: An alternative to the classic board. Family Business Review, 2(2), 125-141.
35.
Klein, S.B., Astrachan, J.H., & Smyrnios, K.X. (2003). Towards the validation of the F-PEC scale of family influence (pp. 183-195). Proceedings of the 14th FBN World Conference. Lausanne, Switzerland.
36.
Korn/Ferry International (1999). Survey of corporate governance. New York.
37.
Lang, J.R., & Lockhart, D.E. (1990). Increased environmental uncertainty and changes in board linkage patterns. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 106-128.
38.
Larsson, L.T., & Melin, L. (1997). The board of directors driving Swedish SMEs forward. Working paper, Jönköping InternationalBusiness School , Sweden.
39.
Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
40.
Lewis, M.W., & Keleman, M. (2002). Multiparadigm inquiry: Exploring organizational pluralism and paradox. Human Relations, 55, 251-275.
41.
Lorsch, J., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
42.
Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 553-563.
43.
Mace, M.L. (1948). The board of directors in small companies. Boston, MA: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
44.
Mathile, C.L. (1988). A business owner's perspective on outside boards . Family Business Review, 1(3), 231-237.
45.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P.H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link . Strategic Management Journal, 4, 221-235.
46.
Mizruchi, M.S. (1983). Who controls whom? An examination between management and boards of directors in large American corporations. Academy of Management Review, 8, 426-435.
47.
Mizruchi, M.S., & Stearns, L.B. (1988). A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 194-210.
48.
Mueller, R.K. (1988). Differential directorship: Special sensitivities and roles for serving the family business board. Family Business Review, 1(3), 239-247.
49.
Muth, M.M., & Donaldson, L. (1998). Stewardship theory and board structure: A contin-gency approach. Corporate Governance, 6(1), 5-28.
50.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
51.
Nash, J.M. (1988). Boards of privately held companies: Their responsibilities and structure. Family Business Review, 1(3), 263-269.
52.
Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 218-228.
53.
Pfeffer J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York : Harper and Row.
54.
Salvato, C.A. (1999). Boards of directors in family firms: mimicry or resource dependence reduction? In G. Capaldo & M. Raffa (Eds.), Innovation and economic development: The role of entrepreneurship and SMEs . Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
55.
Salvato, C.A. (2002a). Antecedents of entrepreneurship in three types of family firms. JIBS Research Report No. 1/2002, Jönköping International Business School.
56.
Salvato, C. (2002b). Towards a stewardship theory of the family firm . Presented at proceedings of the Family Business Network-13th Annual World Conference. Helsinki, Finland.
57.
Schwartz, M.A., & Barnes, L.B. (1991). Outside boards and family businesses: Another look. Family Business Review, 4(3), 269-285.
58.
Sonnenfeld, J.A. (2002). What makes great boards great. Harvard Business Review, September, 106-113.
59.
Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance . Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397-415.
60.
Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and UK. New York : Oxford University Press.
61.
Ward, J.L. (1991). Creating effective boards for private enterprises . New York: Jossey-Bass Publishers .
62.
Ward, J.L., & Handy, J.L. (1988). A survey of board practices. Family Business Review, 1(3), 289-308.
63.
Weimer J., & Pape, J.C. (1999). A taxonomy of systems of corporate governance . Corporate Governance, 7, 152-166.
64.
Whisler, T.L. (1988). The role of the board in the threshold firm. Family Business Review, 1(3), 309-321.
65.
Williamson, O. (1984). Corporate governance. Yale Law Journal, 93, 1197-1229.
66.
Zahra, S.A., & Pearce II, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management , 15(2), 291-334.
