This paper presents preliminary findings from three longitudinal case studies forming part of ongoing doctoral research into the activities and dynamics of business-owning families as they address the tasks and issues required during their succession processes. Specifically, the paper qualitatively explores the nature, characteristics, and effects of family relationship dynamics in three family business systems undertaking the transfer of controlling ownership to the next generation (from father to son). A model is presented to describe the sources of anxiety “imperatives” and their management during transition processes. Conclusions are drawn about the characteristics of emotional dynamics in business-owning families and how these can, over time, hinder or help families manage these tasks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, F.H. (1991). Reweaving the family tapestry: A multigenerational approach to families. New York: Norton.
2.
Burr, W.R. (1991). Rethinking levels of abstraction in family systems theories. Family Process, 30, 435-452
3.
Carter, B., & McGoldrick. M. (1989). The changing family life cycle: A framework for family therapy. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Crampton, C.D. (1994). The entrepreneurial family. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CN.
5.
Crampton, C.D. (1993). Is rugged individualism the whole story? Public and private accounts of a firm's story. Family Business Review6(3), 233-262.
6.
Danco, L.A. (1975). Beyond survival: A business owner's guide for success. Cleveland: University Press .
7.
Davis, J.A. (1982). The influence of life stage on father-son work relationships in family companies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University, Graduate School of Business.
8.
DeSchazer, S. (1984). The death of resistance. Family Process, 23, 11-17.
9.
Donnelly, R. (1964). The family business. Harvard Business Review42(4), 93-105.
10.
Dunn, B. (1995). The challenges facing Scotland's family enterprises . Glasgow: Centre For Family Enterprise .
11.
Gersick, C.J.G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 10-36.
12.
Gersick, K.E., Davis, J.A., McCollom Hampton, M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13.
Gilbert, R. (1992). Extraordinary relationships: A new way of thinking about human interactions. Minneapolis, MN: Chronimed Publishing.
14.
Greiner, L.E. (1991). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow . In L. B. Barnes & C. J. Kaftan (eds.), Organizational transitions for individuals, families, and organizations. (pp. 345-355). New Brunswick, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
Handler, W.C. (1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7(2), 133-158.
16.
Handler, W.C. (1989). Managing the family firm succession process: The next-generation member's experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Boston UniversityGraduate School of Management, Boston.
17.
Hershon, S.A., (1975). The problem of management succession. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, Boston.
18.
Hollander, B. (1983). Family-owned businesses as a system: A case study of the interaction of family, task and marketplace components. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh Graduate Faculty of Education, Pittsburgh, PA.
19.
Kerr, M., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation. New York : Norton.
20.
Lansberg, I. (1983). Managing human resources in family firms: The problem of institutional overlap. Organizational Dynamics12(1), 39-46.
21.
Lansberg, I. (1988). The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1(2), 119-143
22.
Levinson, D.J. (1978). Seasons of a man's life. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Longnecker, J.G., & Schoen, J.E. (1978). Management succession in a family business. Journal of Small Business Management, 16(3), 1-6.
24.
Papero, D. (1996). Anxiety and organizations in the emotional side of organizations: Applications of Bowen Theory. Proceedings of the Georgetown Family Center Conference, 53.
25.
Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J.A. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199- 208.
26.
Walsh, F. (1994). Healthy family functioning: Conceptual research developments. Family Business Review, 7(2) 175-198.
27.
Walsh, F. (1993). Normal family process. (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford.
28.
Ward, J.L. (1978). Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Whiteside, M.F., & Brown, F.H. (1991). Drawbacks of a dual systems approach to family firms: Can we expand our thinking? Family Business Review . 6(4), 383-395.
