Farmers in family businesses are often interested in generational succession. Yet farming parents are often unclear about the process of choosing a successor. We undertook a grounded-method study of the succession process among New Zealand farm families. The process included five stages: watching for interest, reducing the pool of eligibles, assessing commitment, compensating the others, and placing the successor. We make suggestions for future research that will test the model of succession, and for use of these findings by farm families who are contemplating family succession.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, R.M., & Rosenblatt, P.C. (1985). Intergenerational transfer of farm land. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, 6(1), 19-25.
2.
Bennett, J.W. (1982). The agrifamily system. In J. W. Bennett (Ed.), Of time and the enterprise (pp. 128-147). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
Fairweather, J. (1987). Farmers' responses to economic restructuring: Preliminary analysis of survey data. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit. Lincoln College Canterbury, New Zealand.
4.
Fennel, R. (1981). Farm succession in theEuropean Community. Sociologia Ruralis, 21, 19-42.
5.
Gasson, R., & Errington, A. (1992). The farm family business. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
6.
Gasson, R., Crow, G., Errington, A., Hutson, J., Marsden, T., & Winter, M. (1988). The farm as a family business: A review. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39(1), 1-41.
7.
Geisler, C.G., Waters, W.F., & Eadie, K. (1985). The changing structure of female agricultural land ownership, 1946 and 1978. Rural Sociology, 50, 74-87.
8.
Gilgun, J.F. (1992). Definition, methodologies, and methods in qualitative family research. In J. Gilgun, K. Daly, & F. Handel (Eds). Qualitative methods in family research. Newbury Park: Sage.
9.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
10.
Hastings, M. (1984). Succession on farms. Journal of the Agricultural Manpower Society, 8, 4-8.
11.
Keating, N., & Little, H. (1994). Getting into it: Farm roles and careers of New Zealand women. Rural Sociology, 59(4), 720-736.
12.
Keating, N., & Munro, B. (1989). Transferring the family farm: Process and implications . Family Relations, 38, 215-218.
13.
Laband, D.N., & Lentz, B.F. (1983). Occupational inheritance in agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65, 311 -314.
14.
Loveridge, A. (1989). Dad sold the farm and a job came up on the forestry: Class mobility in the New Zealand farm workforce. Paper presented to the annual conference of The Sociological Association of Australia, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
15.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Martin, S., & Lee, W. (1990). A general framework for considering risk management at the farm level. In R. Johnson (Ed), Management of risk in New Zealand farming. Rural Policy Unit , MAF Technology, Wellington, New Zealand.
17.
Morse, J. (1992). Qualitative health research. Newbury Park: Sage.
18.
Ostergren, R.C. (1981). Land and family in rural immigrant communities . Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 71, 400-411.
19.
Rogers, S.C., & Salamon, S. (1983). Inheritance and social organization among family farmers. American Ethnologist, 10(3) 529-548.
20.
Russell, C.S., Griffin, C.L., Flinchbaugh, C.S., Martin, M.J., et al. (1985). Coping strategies associated with intergenerational transfer of the family farm. Rural Sociology, 50, 361-376.
21.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
22.
Tevis, C. (1982). To be fair to your off-farm heirs: If you can't give them the farm, give them a chance. Successful Farming , 80, 24-25.
