When the employment of a shareholder in a family business is terminated or when dividends are not paid to inactive members, disputes often arise that can lead to litigation. In the past, minority shareholders have not had much leverage in these situations. However, developments of the past decade have substantially enhanced the position of minority shareholders. Recognizing this, professionals in the family business area may be able to mediate disputes before the polarization that leads to litigation occurs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Davis, J.‘Spouse Troubles.”Family Business, Oct. 1990, p. 32.
2.
Levinson, L.Bartlett's Unfamiliar Quotations. Chicago: College Book Co., 1971.
3.
Model Business Corporation Act, Annotated. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1985, suppl. 1990.
4.
Murdock, C.‘The Evolution of Effective Remedies for Minority Shareholders and Its Impact upon Valuation of Minority Shares.”Notre Dame Law Review, 1990, 65, 425–489.
5.
Murdock, M.Family Mission Statements. Presentation to the Harris Trust & Savings Bank of Chicago Family Conference, Sept. 15 1990.
6.
New York Business Corp. Law. Sees. 1104–a,–1118. New York: McKinney, 1986, suppl. 1988.
7.
O'Toole, J.Vanguard Management: Redesigning the Corporate Future. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1985.
8.
“U-Haul's Patriarch Now Battles Offspring in Bitterest of Feuds.”Wall Street Journal, July 16, 1990, p. A1.
9.
Ward, J.Keeping the Family Business Healthy: How to Plan for Continuing Growth, Profitability, and Family Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
10.
Auerbach v. Bennett, 393 N.E.2d 994 (N.Y. 1979).
11.
Compton v. Paul K. Harding Realty Co., 285 N.E.2d 574 (1972).
12.
Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc., 328 N.E.2d 505 (Mass. 1975).
13.
Fix v. Fix Material Co., Inc., 538 S.W.2d 351 (Mo. Ct. App.1976).
14.
Harris v. Mardan Business Systems, Inc., 421 N.W.2d 350 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988).
15.
In re Kemp & Beatley, Inc., 473 N.E.2d 1173 (N.Y. 1984).
16.
In re Topper, 443 N.YS.2d 359 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.1980).
17.
In the Matter of Maybelle Mintz, 493 N.Y.S.2d 488 (1985).
18.
Sugarman v. Sugarman, 797 F.2d 3 (1st Cir. 1986).
19.
Wilkes and Wilkes v. Springside Nursing Home, Inc., 353 N.E.2d 657 (Mass. 1976).
