This study tracks the strategies of a retail chain over sixty years of its history to show how that vague concept called strategy can be operationalized and to draw conclusions about strategy formation in the entrepreneurial firm that grows large and formalizes its structure. The conclusions focus on patterns of strategic change and on contrasting characteristics of entrepreneurship and planning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Chandler, A. D.Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1962.
2.
Filley, A. C., House, R. J., and Kerr, S.Managerial Process and Organizational Behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott Foresman, 1976.
3.
Miller, D., and Friesen, P.“Archetypes of Strategy Formation.”Management Science, 1978, 24 (9), 921–933.
4.
Miller, D., Mintzberg, H. “The Case for Configuration.” Working paper, Faculty of Management, McGill University, 1980.
5.
Mintzberg, H.“Strategy Making in three modes.”California Management Review, 197316 (2), 44–53.
6.
Mintzberg, H.“Patterns in Strategy Formation.”Management Science, 197824 (9), 934–948.
7.
Mintzberg, H.The Structuring of Organiztions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
8.
Rumelt, R. P.Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Cambridge, Mass.: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administrations, Harvard University, 1974.
9.
Scott, B. R.“The Industrial State: Old Myths and New Realities.”Harvard Business Review, 197351 (2), 133–148.
10.
Starbuck, W. H., and Hedberg, B.L.T.“Saving on Organization from a Stagnating Environment.” In H. B. Thorelli (ed.), Strategy and Structure Performance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.
