We develop and extend fledgling literature on procedural justice climate and succession processes in family firms by focusing on the impact of family vision and exchange systems on procedural justice climate among nonfamily managers. Drawing upon social exchange theory, we argue that family involvement accompanied by a weak family vision will be associated with restricted exchanges in dominant coalitions, which will have a negative impact on procedural justice climate among nonfamily managers. Conversely, we suggest that family involvement with a strong family vision will be accompanied by generalized exchange, which should positively impact the procedural justice climate among nonfamily managers. We expect that the extent to which nonfamily managers work to support or hinder intra–family succession will be influenced by their collective perception of a positive or negative procedural justice climate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertS. & WhettenD.A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.
2.
ArregleJ., HittM.A., SirmonD.G., & VeryP. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73–95.
3.
AstrachanJ.H. & JaskiewiczP. (2008). Emotional returns and emotional costs in privately held family businesses: Advancing traditional business valuation. Family Business Review, 21, 139–149.
4.
AstrachanJ.H., KleinS.B., & SmyrniosK.X. (2002). The F–PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review, 15, 45–58.
5.
BarnettT. & KellermannsF.W. (2006). Are we family and are we treated as family: Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 837–854.
6.
BeckerG. (1974). A theory of social interactions. The Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063–1093.
7.
BladerS.L. & TylerT.R. (2005). How can theories of organizational justice explain the effects of fairness? In GreenbergJ. & ColquittJ.A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 329–354). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
BlauP. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
9.
BruceD. & PicardD. (2006). Making succession a success: Perspectives from Canadian small and medium–sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 306–309.
10.
Cabrera–SuárezK. (2005). Leadership transfer and the successor's development in the family firm. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 71–96.
11.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family–controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249–265.
12.
CarrP. (2003). Revisiting the protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism: Understanding the relationship between ethics and enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 7–16.
13.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., KellermannsF.W., & ChangE.P.C. (2007). Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held firms. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1030–1038.
14.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & LitzR.A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non–family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 335–354.
15.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., PearsonA., & BarnettT. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family–centered non–economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 267–293.
16.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & SharmaP. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11(1), 19–34.
17.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 555–575.
18.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., & SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 19–39.
19.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., & SharmaP. (2003). Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationships with nonfamily managers. Family Business Review, 16, 89–107.
20.
ColemanJ. (1986). Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 1309–1335.
21.
ColquittJ.A., GreenbergJ., & Zapata–PhelanC.P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In GreenbergJ. & ColquittJ.A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
ColquittJ.A., NoeR.A., & JacksonC.L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83–107.
23.
CropanzanoR. & ByrneZ.S. (2001). When it's time to stop writing policies: An inquiry to procedural injustice. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 31–54.
24.
DavisJ.H., AllenM.R., & HayesH. (2010). Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1093–1116.
25.
De MassisA., ChuaJ., & ChrismanJ. (2008). Factors preventing intra–family succession. Family Business Review, 21(2), 183–199.
26.
DegoeyP. (2000). Contagious justice: Exploring the social construction of justice in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 51–102.
27.
DyckB., MauwsM., StarkeF.A., & MischkeG.A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 143–162.
28.
DyerW.G., Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
29.
EhrhartM.G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit–level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61–94.
30.
EkehP.P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
EnsleyM.D. & PearsonA.W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 267–284.
32.
FolgerR. & KonovskyM.A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.
33.
GillmoreM.R. (1987). Implications of generalized versus restricted exchange. In CookK.S. (Ed.), Social exchange theory (pp. 170–189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
GoldbergS.D. (1997). Noren discount drugs: Death of a family business. Family Business Review, 10(1), 69–93.
35.
Gomez–MejiaL.R., HynesK.T., Nunez–NickelM., & Moyano–FuentesH. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risk in family–controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106–137.
36.
GouldnerA. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.
37.
HabbershonT.G. & WilliamsM.L. (1999). A resource–based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1–15.
38.
HandlerW. (1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7(2), 133–157.
39.
HomansG.C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.
40.
KleinS.B., AstrachanJ.H., & SmyrniosK.X. (2005). The F–PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 321–339.
41.
LansbergI. (1988). The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1(2), 119–143.
42.
LansbergI. (2007). The tests of a prince. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), September, 92–101.
43.
Le Breton–MillerI., MillerD., & SteierL. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 305–328.
44.
LeanaC. & Van BurenH.III,. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24, 538–555.
45.
LeventhalG.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In GergenK., GreenbergM., & WillisR. (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.
46.
LiA. & CropanzanoR. (2009). Fairness at the group level: Justice climate and intraunit justice climate. Journal of Management, 35, 564–599.
47.
LiaoH. & RuppD. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross–level multifoci framework. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 242–256.
48.
LindE.A. & TylerT.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
49.
LongR.G. & ChrismanJ.C. (in press). Management succession in family business. In SharmaP., MelinL., & NordqvistM. (Eds.), Sage handbook of family business. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
50.
LongR.G. & MathewsK.M. (2011). Ethics in the family firm: Cohesion through reciprocity and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 287–308.
51.
LubatkinM.H., LingY., & SchulzeW.S. (2007). An organization justice–based view of self–control and agency costs in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 955–971.
52.
LubatkinM.H., SchulzeW.S., LingY., & DinoR. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family–managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 313–330.
53.
MastersonS.S., LewisK., GoldmanB.M., & TaylorM.S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738–748.
54.
MayerD., NishiiL., SchneiderB., & GoldsteinH. (2007). The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences. Personnel Psychology, 60, 929–963.
55.
McAllisterD.J., MorrisonE.W., KamdarD., & TurbanD.B. (2007). Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1200–1211.
56.
MinichilliA., CorbettaG., & MacMillanI.C. (2010). Top management teams in family–controlled companies: “Familiness,” “faultlines,” and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 205–222.
57.
MossholderK.W., BennettN., & MartinC.L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 131–141.
58.
NaumannS.E. & BennettN. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 881–889.
59.
ParkerS.K., BindlU.K., & StraussK. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856.
60.
PearsonA.W., CarrJ.C., & ShawJ. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 949–969.
61.
PozaE.J., AlfredT., & MaheshwariA. (1997). Stakeholder perceptions of culture and management practices in family and family firms—A preliminary report. Family Business Review, 10(2), 135–155.
62.
RobersonQ.M. (2006a). Justice in teams: The activation and role of sensemaking in the emergence of justice climates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 177–192.
63.
RobersonQ.M. (2006b). Justice in teams: The effects of interdependence and identification on referent choice and justice climate strength. Social Justice Research, 19, 323–344.
64.
RobersonQ.M. & ColquittJ.A. (2005). Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams. Academy of Management Review, 30, 595–607.
65.
RuppD.E. & CropanzanoR. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 925–946.
66.
SalancikG.R. & PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.
67.
SchulzeW.S., LubatkinM.H., & DinoR.N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179–194.
68.
SchulzeW.S., LubatkinM.H., DinoR.N., & BuchholtzA.K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99–116.
69.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ., PabloA., & ChuaJ. (2001). Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family firms: A conceptual model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 17–35.
70.
SweeneyP.D. & McFarlinD.B. (1997). Workers’ evaluations of the “ends” and the “means”: An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23–40.
71.
TaylorM.S., TracyK.B., RenardM.K., HarrisonJ.K., & CarrollS.J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi–experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 495–523.
72.
ThibautJ. & WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. New York: Wiley.
73.
WhettenD.A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15, 219–234.
