We examine how entrepreneurs’ behaviors related to credentials and impression management (IM) impact perceptions of new venture (NV) legitimacy. Results from this experiment, as hypothesized, show that entrepreneurs’ credentials and IM behaviors are positively related to legitimacy perceptions. Contrary to expectations, however, findings do not support either interaction hypothesis when credentials are high or low. We discuss how these findings illustrate the importance of entrepreneurs’ behaviors during the NV creation process and outline multiple directions for future research.
AldrichH.E. & FiolC.M. (1994). Fools rush in: The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–667.
3.
AshforthB.E. & GibbsB.W. (1990). The double–edge of organizational legitimization. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.
4.
AshforthB.E. & JohnsonS. (2001). Which hat to wear? The relative salience of multiple identities in organizational contexts. In HoggM. & TerryD. (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 31–48). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
5.
BaronR.A. & MarkmanG.D. (2003). Beyond social capital: The role of entrepreneurs’ social competence in their financial success. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 41–60.
6.
BarsnessZ.I., DiekmannK.A., & SeidelM.L. (2005). Motivation and opportunity: The role of remote work, demographic dissimilarity, and social network centrality in impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 401–419.
7.
BaumJ. & SilvermanB. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 411–436.
8.
BeckerT.E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274–289.
9.
BitektineA. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputations, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.
10.
BolinoM.C., KacmarK.M., TurnleyW.H., & GilstrapJ.B. (2008). A multi–level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1080–1109.
11.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ.E. (Ed.), Handbook of theory of research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
12.
BoweyJ.L. & EastonG. (2007). Entrepreneurial social capital unplugged. International Small Business Journal, 25(3), 273–306.
13.
ChemmanurT.J. & PaeglisI. (2005). Management quality, certification, and initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 331–368.
14.
ChenX., YaoX., & KothaS. (2009). Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 199–214.
15.
ChoiY., HiseR.T., BagozziR.P., & FadilP.A. (2010). Communication, utilization, and performance in international strategic alliances. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 20, 8–25.
16.
ChoiY.R. & ShepherdD.A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management, 31(4), 573–596.
17.
ClarkeJ. (2011). Revitalizing entrepreneurship: How visual symbols are used in entrepreneurial performances. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1365–1391.
18.
CollinsR. (1979). The credential society: A historical sociology of education and stratification. New York: Academic Press.
19.
DavidssonP. (2008). The entrepreneurship research challenge. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
20.
De ClercqD. & DimovD. (2008). Internal knowledge development and external knowledge access in venture capital investment performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 585–612.
21.
De ClercqD. & VoronovM. (2009). The role of cultural and symbolic capital in entrepreneurs’ ability to meet expectations about conformity and innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 398–420.
22.
DelmarF. & ShaneS. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 385–410.
23.
DiMaggioP.J. & PowellW.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
24.
DowlingJ. & PfefferJ. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122–136.
25.
DulebohnJ.H. & FerrisG.R. (1999). The role of influence tactics in perceptions of performance evaluations’ fairness. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 288–303.
26.
EllisA., WestP., RyanB., & DeShonR.P. (2002). The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type?The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1200–1208.
27.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.
28.
GordonR.A. (1996). Impact of ingratiation on judgments and evaluations: A meta–analytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 54–70.
29.
GrandeyA.A., FiskG.M., MattilaA.S., JansenK.J., & SidemanL.A. (2005). Is “service with a smile” enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 38–55.
30.
HannanM.T. & FreemanJ. (1984). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.
31.
HaytonJ.C. & KelleyD.J. (2006). A competency–based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 407–427.
32.
HazerJ.T. & JacobsonJ.R. (2003). Effects of screener self–monitoring on the relationships among applicant positive self–presentation, objective credentials, and employability ratings. Journal of Management, 29, 119–138.
33.
HigginsE.T. (1996). The self digest: Self–knowledge serving self–regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1062–1083.
34.
HoltR. & MacphersonA. (2010). Rhetoric, sensemaking and the socially competent entrepreneur. International Small Business Journal, 28(1), 20–42.
35.
HowardJ.L. & FerrisG.R. (1996). The employment interview context: Social and situational influences on interviewer decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(2), 112–136.
36.
JonesE.E. & PittmanT.S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self–presentation. In SulsJ. (Ed.), Psychological perspective on the self (pp. 231–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
JudgeT.A. & BretzR.D. (1994). Political influence behavior and career success. Journal of Management, 20, 43–65.
38.
Kristof–BrownA., BarrickM.R., & FrankeM. (2002). Applicant impression management: Dispositional influences and consequences for recruiter perceptions of fit and similarity. Journal of Management, 28, 27–46.
39.
LarsonA. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76–104.
40.
LearyM.R. & KowalskiR.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two–component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.
41.
LounsburyM. & GlynnM.A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564.
McGuireW.J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In LindzeyG. & AronsonE. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233–346). New York: Random House.
44.
MeyerJ.W. & RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
45.
PandeyJ. (1986). Sociological perspectives on ingratiation. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 14, 205–229.
46.
PollackJ.M., RutherfordM.W., & NagyB.N. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents to new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915–939.
47.
RutherfordM.W. & BullerP.F. (2007). Searching for the legitimacy threshold. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16, 78–92.
48.
RutherfordM.W., BullerP.F., & StebbinsJ.M. (2009). Ethical considerations of the legitimacy lie. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 949–964.
49.
SapienzaH.J. & KorsgaardM.A. (1996). The role of procedural justice in entrepreneur–venture capital relations. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 544–574.
50.
ShaneS. & CableC. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48, 364–381.
51.
ShepherdD.A., DouglasE.J., & ShanleyM.T. (2000). New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks, and risk reduction strategies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 393–410.
52.
ShepherdD.A. & ZacharakisA. (2003). A new venture's cognitive legitimacy: An assessment by customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41, 148–167.
53.
SiegelP.A. & BrocknerJ. (2005). Individual and organizational consequences of CEO claimed handicapping: What's good for the CEO may not be good for the firm. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 1–22.
54.
SinghJ.V., TuckerD.J., & HouseR.J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171–193.
55.
SteierL. & GreenwoodR. (1995). Venture capitalist relationships in the deal structuring and post–investment stages of new firm creation. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 337–357.
56.
StevensC.K. & KristofA.L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of applicant impression management during job interviews. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 587–606.
57.
StinchcombeA.L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In MarchJ.G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
58.
StuartT.E., HoangH., & HybelsR.C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 315–349.
59.
SuchmanM.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 571–610.
60.
ThornhillS. & AmitR. (2003). Learning about failure: Bankruptcy, firm age, and the resource–based view. Organization Science, 14, 497–509.
61.
TornikoskiE.T. & NewbertS.L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 311–335.
62.
TyebjeeT. & BrunoA. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science, 9, 1051–1066.
63.
UseemM. & KarabelJ. (1986). Pathways to top corporate management. American Sociological Review, 51, 184–200.
64.
VenkataramanS. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In KatzJ. & BrockhausR. (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
65.
WayneS.J. & KacmarK.M. (1991). The effects of impression management on the performance appraisal process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 70–88.
66.
WestphalJ.D. & SternI. (2006). The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 169–204.
67.
WestphalJ.D. & SternI. (2007). Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male Caucasian): How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at U.S. companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 267–288.
68.
ZimmermanM.A. & ZeitzG.J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 414–431.
69.
ZottC. & HuyQ.N. (2007). How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 70–105.
70.
ZuckerL.G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.
