A long–term orientation (LTO) is often associated with family firms, but the LTO construct is underdeveloped. This paper sets forth a framework for studying LTO in family firms including developing three dimensions—futurity, continuity, and perseverance. It identifies LTO as a higher–order heuristic that, in matters of intertemporal choice, provides a dominant logic for decisions and actions. Intertemporal choice refers to decisions with payoffs or outcomes that play out over time. Three mechanisms affecting intertemporal choices are identified—representation, self–control, and anticipation. LTO and intertemporal choice are further examined and discussed in the context of family firms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonR.C. & ReebD.M. (2003). Founding–family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1328.
2.
ArielyD. & CarmonZ. (2000). Gestalt characteristics of experience: The defining features of summarized events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 191–201.
3.
ArregleJ.L., HittM.A., SirmonD.G., & VeryP. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73–95.
BazermanM.H. & MooreD.A. (2009). Judgment in managerial decision making. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
6.
BeardenW.O., MoneyR.B., & NevinsJ.L. (2006). A measure of long–term orientation: Development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 456–467.
7.
BergerP.D. & NasrN.I. (1998). Customer lifetime value: Marketing models and applications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 12(1), 17–30.
8.
BernheimB.D. & RangelA. (2004). Addiction and cue–triggered decision processes. American Economic Review, 94, 1558–1590.
9.
BernsG.S., LaibsonD., & LoewensteinG. (2007). Intertemporal choice—Toward an integrative framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(11), 482–488.
10.
BettisR.A. & PrahaladC.K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 5–14.
11.
BolesJ.S. (1996). Influences of work–family conflict on job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and quitting intentions among business owners: The case of family operated businesses. Family Business Review, 9(1), 61–74.
12.
BrockhausR.H. (2004). Family business succession: Suggestions for future research. Family Business Review, 17(2), 165–177.
13.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family–controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249–265.
14.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & LitzR. (2003). A unified perspective of family firm performance: An extension and integration. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 467–472.
15.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., PearsonA.W., & BarnettT. (2010). Family involvement, family influence, and family centered non–economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, doi: 10.1111/j.1540–6520.2010.00407.x.
16.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., & SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39.
17.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., & SharmaP. (2003). Succession and non–succession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with non–family managers. Family Business Review, 16, 89–107.
18.
CliffeS. (1998). Family business: Facing up to succession. Harvard Business Review, 76, 16–17.
19.
CollinsJ.C. & PorrasJ.I. (1997). Built to last. New York: Harper Business.
20.
DasT.K. & TengB.S. (1997). Time and entrepreneurial risk behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(Winter), 69–88.
21.
DavisJ.A. (1982). The influence of life stage on father–son work relationships in family companies. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Business School.
22.
DavisP.S. & HarvestonP. (1999). In the founder's shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review, 12(4), 311–323.
23.
DavisP.S. & HarvestonP.D. (1998). The influence of family on the family business succession process: A multi–generational perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(Spring), 31–53.
24.
De MassisA., ChuaJ.C., & ChrismanJ.J. (2008). Factors preventing intra–family succession. Family Business Review, 21, 183–199.
25.
DrozdowN. (1998). What is continuity?Family Business Review, 11(4), 337–347.
26.
DyerW.G.Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
27.
DyerW.G.Jr. (1989). Integrating professional management into a family owned business. Family Business Review, 2(3), 221–235.
28.
DyerW.G. & WhettenD.A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 785–802.
29.
EnsleyM.D. (2006). Family businesses can out–compete: As long as they are willing to question the chosen path. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 747–754.
30.
EnsleyM.D. & PearsonA.W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: Cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 267–284.
31.
GanesanS. (1994). Determinants of long–term orientation in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1–19.
32.
GersickC.J.G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 1, 9–41.
33.
GolemanD. (2006). Emotional intelligence: 10th anniversary edition. New York: Bantam.
34.
Gómez–MejíaL., Nuñez–NickelM., & GutierrezI. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 81–95.
35.
Gómez–MejíaL.R., HaynesK., Nuñez–NickelM., JacobsonK., & Moyano–FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106–137.
36.
HabbershonT.G., WilliamsM., & MacMillanI.C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451–465.
37.
HallA. & NordqvistM. (2008). Professional management in family businesses: Toward an extended understanding. Family Business Review, 21(1), 51–69.
38.
HandlerW.C. (1989). Managing the family firm succession process: The next generation family members’ experience. Doctoral dissertation, School of Management, Boston University.
39.
HandlerW.C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next generation family members. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37–51.
40.
HisrichR. & BrushC. (1986). Characteristics of the minority entrepreneur. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(4), 1–8.
41.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
HofstedeG. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw–Hill.
43.
JacobsM.T. (1991). Short–term America: The cause and cures of our business myopia. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
44.
KahnemanD., SlovicP., & TverskyA. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
KahnemanD. & TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.
46.
KellyL.M., AthanassiouN., & CrittendenW.F. (2000). Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family–owned firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27–42.
47.
KerteszR. & AtalayaC.I. (1999). Family businesses in Argentina: Current issues. Community, Work and Family, 2(1), 93–103.
48.
KuratkoD.F., HornsbyJ.S., & NaffzigerD.W. (1997). An examination of owner's goals in sustaining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(1), 24–34.
49.
LambrechtJ. (2005). Multigenerational transition in family businesses: A new exploratory model. Family Business Review, 18(4), 267–282.
50.
LansbergI. (1999). Succeeding generations: Realizing the dream of families in business. Boston: Harvard University School Press.
51.
LavertyK.J. (1996). Economic “short–termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Academy of Management Review, 21, 825–860.
52.
Le Breton–MillerI. & MillerD. (2006). Why do some family businesses out–compete? Governance, long–term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 731–746.
53.
Le Breton–MillerI., MillerD., & SteierL.P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 305–328.
54.
LeeK.S., LimG.H., & LimW.S. (2003). Family business succession: Appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 657–666.
55.
LoewensteinG. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Economic Journal, 97, 666–684.
56.
LoewensteinG. & SichermanN. (1991). Do workers prefer increasing wage profiles?Journal of Labor Economics, 9(1), 67–84.
57.
LoewensteinG. & ThalerR. (1989). Anomalies: Intertemporal choice. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 181–193.
LubatkinM.H., LingY., & SchulzeW.S. (2003). Explaining agency problems in family firms using behavioral economics and justice theories. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings, Seattle, WA.
60.
LubatkinM.H., LingY., & SchulzeW.S. (2007). An organizational justice–based view of self–control and agency costs in family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 955–971.
61.
LubatkinM.H., SchulzeW.S., LingY., & DinoR.N. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family–managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 313–330.
62.
LumpkinG.T., BrighamK.H., & MossT. (2010). Long–term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3), 1–24.
63.
MarshallJ.P., SorensonR.L., BrighamK.H., WielingE., ReifmanA., & WamplerR. (2006). The paradox for the family firm CEO: Owner age relationship to succession–related processes and plans. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(3), 348–368.
64.
McCannJ.E., Leon–GuerreroA.Y., & HaleyJ.D. (2001). Strategic goals and practices of innovative family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 50–59.
65.
McClureS.M., LaibsonD., LoewensteinG., & CohenJ.D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503–507.
66.
MellersB.A. & McGrawA.P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 210–214.
67.
MeyerG.D. & HeppardK.A. (2000). Entrepreneurial strategies: The dominant logic of entrepreneurship. In MeyerG.D. & HeppardK.A. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as strategy (pp. 1–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
MillerD. & FriesenP. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25.
70.
MillerD. & Le Breton–MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
71.
MillerD., Le Breton–MillerI., & ScholnickB. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non–family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.
72.
MillerD. & ShamsieJ. (2001). Learning across the life cycle. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 725–745.
73.
MillerD., SteierL., & Le Breton–MillerI. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 513–531.
74.
MitchellR.K., AgleB.R., & WoodD.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
75.
MosakowskiE. & EarleyP.C. (2000). A selective review of time assumptions in strategy research. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 796–812.
76.
MyersS.C. & MajlufN.S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 187–221.
77.
O'DonoghueT. & RubinM. (2000). The economics of immediate gratification. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 233–250.
78.
PorterM.E. (1996). What is strategy?Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.
79.
PrahaladC.K. & BettisR.A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 485–501.
80.
PrelecD. & LoewensteinG. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37(7), 770–786.
81.
PrelecD. & LoewensteinG. (1993). Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychological Review, 100, 91–108.
82.
SalvatoC., ChiricoF., & SharmaP. (2010). Understanding exit from the founder's business in family firms. In StewartA., LumpkinG. T., & KatzJ. A. (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (Vol. 12, pp. 31–85). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald.
83.
SchellingT. (1984). Self–command in practice, in policy, and in a theory of rational choice. American Economic Review, 74, 1–11.
84.
SchulzeW.S., LubatkinM., & DinoR. (2002). Altruism, agency and the competitiveness of family firms. Journal of Managerial and Decision Economics, 23, 247–259.
85.
SchulzeW.S., LubatkinM.H., & DinoR.N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473–490.
86.
SharmaP. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review, 17, 1–36.
87.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ.J., & ChuaJ.H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10, 1–36.
88.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ.J., & ChuaJ.H. (2003). Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16(1), 1–15.
89.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ.J., PabloA.L., & ChuaJ.H. (2001). Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family firms: A conceptual model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(3), 17–35.
90.
SirmonD.G. & HittM.A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339–358.
91.
SonnenfeldJ. (1988). The hero's farewell. What happens when CEOs retire. New York: Oxford University Press.
92.
TagiuriR. & DavisJ.A. (1992). On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5(1), 43–62.
93.
ThalerR.H. (2000). From homo economicus to homo sapiens. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 133–141.
94.
TverskyA. & KahnemanD. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
95.
VenkatramanN. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35, 942–962.
96.
WardJ.L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
97.
WardJ.L. (2004). Perpetuating the family business. Marietta, GA: Family Enterprise Publishers.
98.
WestheadP. & HoworthC. (2007). “Types” of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19, 405–431.
99.
WinterM., DanesS.M., KohS.–K., FredericksK., & PaulJ.J. (2004). Tracking family businesses and their owners over time: Panel attrition, manager departure and business demise. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 535–559.
100.
ZahraS. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18, 23–40.
101.
ZahraS.A., HaytonJ.C., & SalvatoC. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non–family firms: A resource based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 363–381.
102.
ZellwegerT. (2007). Time horizon, cost of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review, 20, 1–15.
103.
ZellwegerT. & NasonR.S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review, 21, 203–216.
