Effectuation represents a paradigmatic shift in the way that we understand entrepreneurship. Since its introduction, however, few researchers have attempted to empirically test effectuation. Our purpose is to encourage effectuation research. To do so, we review the effectuation literature and make suggestions for how to design and conduct empirically rigorous effectuation studies consistent with the developmental state of the research stream.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlligerG.M. & WilliamsK.J. (1993). Using signal–contingent experience sampling methodology to study work in the field: A discussion and illustration examining task perceptions and mood. Personnel Psychology, 46, 525–549.
2.
BakerT. & NelsonR.E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 329–366.
3.
BerghD.D., PerryJ.T., & HankeR. (2006). Some predictors of SMJ article impact. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 81–100.
4.
BigleyG.A. & RobertsK.H. (2001). The incident command system: High–reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1281–1299.
BloomB.S. (1982). The role of gifts and markers in the development of talent. Exceptional Children, 48, 510–521.
7.
BollenK. & LennoxR. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.
8.
ChandlerG., DeTienneD., McKelvieA., & MumfordT. (in press). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.00.
9.
ChandlerG., DeTienneD., & MumfordT. (2007). Causation and effectuation: Measure development and theoretical implications. In AlvarezS., DavidssonP., FietJ., GeorgeG., KuratkoD.F., MasonC., MaulaM., MinnitiM., SarasvathyS., ShepherdD.A., WestheadP., WiklundJ., WrightM., ZahraS.A., & ZacharakisA. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 27 (pp. 1–13). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
10.
ChandlerG.N. & JansenE. (1992). The founder's self–assessed competence and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 223–236.
11.
ChandlerG.N. & LyonD.W. (2001). Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 101–113.
12.
ChilesT.H., BluedornA.C., & GuptaV.K. (2007). Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: A radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28, 467–493.
13.
ChilesT.H., GuptaV.K., & BluedornA.C. (2008). On Lachmannian and effectual entrepreneurship: A rejoinder to Sarasvathy and Dew (2008). Organization Studies, 29, 247–253.
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
ColtmanT., DevinneyT.M., MidgleyD.F., & VenaikS. (2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1250–1262.
16.
CookT.D. & CampbellD.T. (1979). Quasi–experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
17.
CooperA., Gimeno–GasconJ., & WooC. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 13–30.
18.
DeakinJ.M., CoteJ., & HarveyA.S. (2006). Time budgets, diaries, and analyses of concurrent practice activities. In EricssonK.A., CharnessN., FeltovichP.J., & HoffmanR.R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 303–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
DenrellJ., FangC., & WinterS.G. (2003). The economics of strategic opportunity. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 977–990.
20.
DewN., ReadS., SarasvathyS.D., & WiltbankR. (2008). Outlines of a behavioral theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 66, 37–59.
21.
DewN., ReadS., SarasvathyS.D., & WiltbankR. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision–making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 287–309.
22.
DewN. & SarasvathyS.D. (2002). What effectuation is not: Further development of an alternative to rational choice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO.
23.
DewN., SarasvathyS.D., ReadS., & WiltbankR. (2008). Immortal firms in mortal markets? An entrepreneurial perspective on the “innovator's dilemma.”European Journal of Innovation Management, 11, 313–329.
24.
DewN., SarasvathyS.D., ReadS., & WiltbankR. (2009). Affordable loss: Behavioral economic aspects of the plunge decision. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 105–126.
25.
DiamantopoulosA. & SiguawJ.A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 263–282.
26.
DruckerP.F. (1998). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 76, 149–157.
27.
EdmondsonA.C. & McManusS.E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 22, 1155–1179.
28.
EisenhowerD., MathiowetzN.A., & MorgansteinD. (2004). Recall bias: Sources and bias reduction techniques. In BiemerP.B., GrovesR.M., LybergL.E., MathiowetzN.A., & SudmanS. (Eds.), Measurement errors in surveys (pp. 127–144). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
29.
FrederiksonJ.R. & WhiteB.Y. (1989). An approach to training based upon principled task decomposition. Acta Psychologica, 71, 89–146.
30.
GersickC.J. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41.
31.
GoelS. & KarriR. (2006). Entrepreneurs, effectual logic, and over–trust. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 477–493.
32.
HambrickD.C. & MasonP.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.
33.
HamiltonB. & NickersonJ. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1, 51–78.
34.
HarmelingS.S., ObermanS., VenkataramanS., & StevensonH.H. (2004). That my neighbor's cow might live: Effectuation, entrepreneurship education, and regional development in Croatia. In ShakerA., ZahraS.A., BrushC.G., DavidssonP., FietJ., GreeneP.G., HarrisonR.T., LernerM., MasonC., MeyerG.D., SohlJ., & ZacharakisA. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 24 (pp. 1–14). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
35.
HartingT. (2004). Entrepreneurial effectuation in a corporate setting: The case of Circuit City's Carmax unit. Paper presented at the Babson Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Glasgow, Scotland.
36.
HormuthS.E. (1986). The sampling of experiences in situ. Journal of Personality, 54, 262–293.
37.
KarriR. & GoelS. (2008). Effectuation and over–trust: Response to Sarasvathy and Dew. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 739–748.
38.
MacKenzieS.B., PodsakoffP.M., & JarvisC.B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710–730.
39.
McGrathJ. (1982). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. In McGrathJ.E., MartinJ., & KulkaR.A. (Eds.), Judgment calls in research (pp. 69–102). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
MinerA.S., BassoffP., & MoormanC. (2001). Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 304–337.
41.
MorrisM.H., KuratkoD.F., & CovinJ.G. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation: Entrepreneurial development within organizations. Mason, OH: Thomson/South–Western Publishers.
42.
PfefferJ. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as an independent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599–620.
43.
PolivkaA.E. & NardoneT. (1989). On the definition of contingent work. Monthly Labor Review, 112, 9–16.
44.
ProctorR.W. & VuK.–P.L. (2006). Laboratory studies of training, skill acquisition, and retention. In EricssonK.A., CharnessN., FeltovichP.J., & HoffmanR.R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 265–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
ReadS., DewN., SarasvathyS.D., SongM., & WiltbankR. (2009). Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of an effectual approach. Journal of Marketing, 73, 1–18.
46.
ReadS. & SarasvathyS.D. (2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know: Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. Journal of Private Equity, 9, 45–62.
47.
ReadS., SongM., & SmitW. (2009). A meta–analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 573–587.
48.
SalancikG.R., StawB.M., & PondyL.R. (1980). Administrative turnover as a response to unmanaged organizational interdependence. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 422–437.
49.
SarasvathyS.D. (1998). How do firms come to be? Towards a theory of the prefirm. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
50.
SarasvathyS.D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, 243–263.
51.
SarasvathyS.D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
52.
SarasvathyS.D. & DewN. (2005). Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21, 385–406.
53.
SarasvathyS.D. & DewN. (2008a). Effectuation and over–trust: Debating Goel and Karri. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 727–738.
54.
SarasvathyS.D. & DewN. (2008b). Is effectuation Lachmannian? A response to Chiles, Bluedorn, and Gupta. Organization Studies, 29, 239–245.
55.
SarasvathyS.D., DewN., ReadS., & WiltbankR. (2008). Designing organizations that design environments: Lessons from entrepreneurial expertise. Organization Studies, 29, 331–350.
56.
SarasvathyS.D., DewN., VelamuriR.S., & VenkataramanS. (2003). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In AcsZ. & AudretschD. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurial research (pp. 141–160). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
57.
SarasvathyS.D. & KothaS. (2001). Dealing with Knightian uncertainty in the new economy: The RealNetworks case. In ButlerJ. (Ed.), Research on management and entrepreneurship (pp. 31–62). Greenwich, CT: IAP, Inc.
58.
SarasvathyS.D., SimonH.A., & LaveL. (1998). Perceiving and managing business risks: Differences between entrepreneurs and bankers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33, 207–225.
59.
ScanduraT.A. & WilliamsE.A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1248–1264.
60.
ShaneS. (2008). The illusions of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. London: Yale University Press.
61.
SimontonD.K. (2006). Historiometric methods. In EricssonK.A., CharnessN., FeltovichP.J., & HoffmanR.R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 319–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SosniakL.A. (2006). Retrospective interviews in the study of expertise and expert performance. In EricssonK.A., CharnessN., FeltovichP.J., & HoffmanR.R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 287–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
StevensonH.H. & GumpertD.E. (1985). The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review, 63, 85–94.
64.
StewartW.H. & RothP.L. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta–analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 145–153.
65.
TrochimW.M.K. (2001). The research methods knowledge base. Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.
66.
UyM.A., FooM.D., & AguinisH. (2010). Using experience sampling methodology to advance entrepreneurship theory and research. Organization Research Methods, 13, 31–54.
67.
VenkataramanS. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In KatzJ. & BrockhausR. (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (pp. 119–138). Greenwich: JAI Press.
68.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource–based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.
69.
WiltbankR., DewN., ReadS., & SarasvathyS.D. (2006). What to do next? The case for non–predictive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 981–998.
70.
WiltbankR., ReadS., DewN., & SarasvathyS.D. (2009). Prediction and control under uncertainly: Outcomes in angel investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 116–133.
