The purpose of this article was to extend existing research on opportunity identification in the social entrepreneurship literature through empirically examining this phenomenon. We used an inductive, theory–building design that surfaced patterns in social value creation across multiple case studies. The patterns showed actors seeing a social need and prospecting ideas that could address it. Data also revealed multiple, not individual, actors, dynamically engaged in interactions that nudged an opportunity into manifestation. Also, data suggested complementarities to effectuation and rational/economic processes that are divergent theoretical approaches to the study of entrepreneurship to date.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlterS. (2006). Social enterprise models and their mission and money. In NichollsA. (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 205–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlvarezS. & BarneyJ. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), 11–26.
3.
AustinJ., StevensonH., & Wei–SkillernJ. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.
4.
CassonsM. (1982). The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.
5.
CorbinJ. & StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.
6.
CovinJ. & SlevinD. (1986). The development and testing of a firm–level entrepreneurship scale. Frontiers of entrepreneurship. Boston: Babson College.
7.
DavidssonP. & WicklundJ. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 81–99.
DeesJ.G. (2007). Taking social entrepreneurship seriously. Society, 44(3), 24–31.
10.
DoradoS. (2006). Social entrepreneurial ventures: Different values so different processes of creation, no?Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 319–343.
11.
DruckerP. (1993). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper Business.
12.
EckhardtJ. & ShaneS. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349.
13.
EisenhardtK. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 488–511.
14.
EisenhardtK. & GraebnerM. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
15.
FossN. & KleinP. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the economic theory of the firm: Any gains from trade? In AgarwalR., AlvarezS., & SorensonO. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship: Disciplinary perspectives (pp. 55–80). New York: Springer.
16.
GalunicD.C. & EisenhardtK. (1996). The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high–technology, multidivisional corporations. Organization Science, 7(3), 255–282.
17.
GalunicD.C. & EisenhardtK. (2001). Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1229–1249.
18.
GoldsteinJ., HazyJ., & SilberstangJ. (2008). Complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fortuitous meeting. E:CO, 10(3), 9–24.
19.
HockertsK. (2006). Entrepreneurial opportunity in social purpose ventures. In MairJ., RobinsonJ., & HockertsK. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 142–154).London: Palgrave.
20.
KoslowskiS.W.J. & KleinK. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK. & KoslowskiS.W.J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: Jossey–Bass Inc.
21.
MairJ. (2006). Introduction to part II: Exploring the intentions and opportunities behind social entrepreneurship. In MairJ., RobinsonJ., & HockertsK. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 89–94). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
MairJ. & MartiI. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36–44.
23.
MairJ. & NoboaE. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. In MairJ., RobinsonJ., & HockertsK. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 121–135).London: Palgrave.
24.
McKelveyB. (2004). Toward a complexity science of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 313–341.
MortG., WeerawardenaJ., & CarnegieK. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualization. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 76–88.
27.
NichollsA. (2006). Introduction. In NichollsA. (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 1–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
PeredoA. & McLeanM. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41, 56–65.
29.
RobinsonJ. (2006). Navigating social and institutional barriers to markets: How social entrepreneurs identify and evaluate opportunities. In MairJ., RobinsonJ., & HockertsK. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 95–120). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
RoperJ. & CheneyG. (2005). The meanings of social entrepreneurship today. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 95–104.
31.
SarasvathyS. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.
32.
SarasvathyS. & DewN. (2008). Effectuation and overtrust: Debating Goel and Karri. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,32(4), 727–737.
33.
SarasvathyS., DewN., VelamuriS.R., & VenkataramanS. (2003). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In AcsZ.J. & AudretschD.B. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 141–160).Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34.
SautetF. (2002). An entrepreneurial theory of the firm. London: Routledge.
35.
Sfeir–YounisA. (2002). The spiritual entrepreneur. Reflections, 3(3), 43–45.
36.
ShaneS. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.
37.
ShaneS. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
38.
ShaneS. & VenkataramanN. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
39.
ShawE. & CarterS. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3), 418–434.
40.
ShumpeterJ. (1976). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: George Allan and Unwin.
41.
SiggelkowN. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.
42.
SinghR. (2001). A comment on developing the field of entrepreneurship through the study of opportunity recognition and exploitation. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 10–12.
43.
ThompsonJ. (2002). The world of the social entrepreneur. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(5), 412–431.
44.
TownsendD. & HartT. (2008). Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 685–700.
45.
WeerawardenaJ. & MortG. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multi–dimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41, 21–35.
46.
YinR. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
YunusM. (2007). The Nobel Peace Prize 2006 Nobel Lecture. Law and Business Review of the Americas, 13, 267–275.
