This article draws on theories about the internationalization process of small– and medium–sized enterprises (SMEs) and feminist arguments to explain gender differences in export propensity. Findings are based on a large–scale survey of Canadian SMEs. After controlling for sector, firm, and owner attributes, female majority–owned firms were significantly less likely to export than firms owned by men. The implications for entrepreneurship and feminist theory, export policy, and research are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AguinisH. (2004). Estimating interaction effects using multiple regression. Richmond, VA: CARMA Webcast, Commonwealth Western University.
2.
AhlH. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621.
3.
AnderssonS. & WictorI. (2003). Innovative internationalisation in new firms: Born globals—The Swedish case. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(3), 249–276.
4.
Bagghi–SenS. (1999). The small and medium–size exporters‘ problems: An empirical analysis of Canadian manufacturers. Regional Studies, 33(3), 231–245.
5.
BaldwinJ. & GuW. (2003). Participation in export markets and productivity performance in Canadian manufacturing (Economic analysis research series, Cat. No. 11F0027MIE2003011). Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.
6.
BeamishP., CraigR., & McLellanK. (1993). The performance characteristics of Canadian versus U.K. exporters in small and medium sized firms. Management International Review, 33(2), 121–137.
7.
BeamishP. & MunroH. (1986). Exporting for success as a small Canadian manufacturer. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 4, 38–43.
8.
BeauchesneE. (2007). Immigrant women in Canada overqualified for jobs, report says. The Ottawa Citizen, June 26, 2007, D2.
9.
BelenkyM., McVicker ClinchyB., GoldbergerN., & TaruleJ. (1986). Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
10.
BlackN. (1989). Social feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
BonaccorsiA. (1992). On the relationship between firm size and export intensity. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 605–635.
12.
BrushC. (1992). Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(4), 5–30.
13.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
14.
ButlerJ. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge Publishing.
15.
CalofJ. (1993). The impact of size on internationalization. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(4), 60–69.
16.
Canadian Bankers Association. (19961998). Small and medium–sized businesses in Canada: An ongoing perspective of their needs, expectations and satisfaction with financial institutions. Conducted by Thompson, Lightstone & Company Limited, on behalf of the Canadian Bankers Association, Toronto.
CarringtonC. (2006). Small business financing profiles. Women entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 19(2), 83–93.
19.
CavusgilT. (1984). Organizational characteristics associated with export activity. Journal of Management Studies, 21(1), 3–22.
20.
CliffJ. (1998). Does one size fit all? Exploring the relationship between attitudes towards growth, gender and business size. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(6), 523–542.
21.
Collins–DoddC., GordonI., & SmartC. (2004). Further evidence on the role of gender in financial performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(4), 395–417.
22.
CovielloN. & JonesM. (2004). Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485–508.
23.
CrantM. (1997). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 42–49.
24.
De BruinA., BrushC., & WelterF. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Towards building cumulative knowledge on women's entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 585–593.
25.
De BruinA., BrushC., & WelterF. (2007). Advancing a framework for coherent research on women's entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 323–339.
26.
De ClercqD. (2005). Firm internationalization by nascent, new and established ventures. Frontiers in entrepreneurship. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
27.
DelmarF., DavidssonP., & GartnerW. (2003). Arriving at the high–growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216.
28.
DhanarajC. & BeamishP. (2003). A resource–based approach to the study of export performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(3), 242–261.
29.
DuRietzA. & HenreksonM. (2000). Testing the female underperformance hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 14(1), 1–10.
30.
ErikssonK., JohansonA., MajkgardA., & SharmaD. (1997). Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 337–360.
31.
FascriM. & ValdezJ. (1998). A performance contrast of male– and female–owned small accounting practices. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(3), 1–7.
32.
FischerE., ReuberR., & DykeL. (1993). A theoretical overview and extension of research on sex, gender, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(2), 151–168.
33.
GordonL. (1976). Woman's body, woman's right: Birth control in America. New York: Grossman.
34.
GrondinD. & SchaeferN. (1995). Differences in the export activities of female and male–owned SME enterprises. Women in Management Review, 10(8), 4–10.
35.
HalabiskyD., LeeB., & ParsleyC. (2005). Small business exporters: A Canadian profile. Ottawa, ON: Small Business Policy Branch.
36.
HeinonenJ., PukkinenT., & NummelaN. (2004). To grow or not to grow? An analysis of internationally growth–oriented Finnish SMEs. Paper presented at The 30th EIBA Annual Conference, Slovenia, December 5–8.
37.
HosmerD.W. & LemeshowS. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
38.
JohnsenG. & McMahonR. (2005). Owner–manager gender, financial performance and business growth amongst SMEs from Australia's business longitudinal survey. International Small Business Journal, 23(2), 115–142.
39.
JonesM. & CovielloN. (2005). Internationalization: Conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 284–303.
40.
KatsikeasC., DengS., & WortzelL. (1997). Perceived export success factors of small and medium–sized Canadian firms. Journal of International Marketing, 5(4), 53–72.
41.
KnightG., (1997). Emerging paradigm for international marketing: The born global firm. Unpublished dissertation, East Lansing, MI, Michigan State University.
42.
KruegerN.F. & CarsrudA.L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 5, 315–330.
43.
LeeF. & HaasH. (1996). Evaluation quantitative des industries à forte concentration de savoir par rapport aux industries à faible concentration de savoir, paru dans la croissance fondée sur le savoir et son incidence sur les politiques microéconomiques, ouvrage publié sous la direction de P. Howitt. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press.
44.
LefebvreE. & LefebvreL. (2000). SMEs, exports and job creation: A firm–level analysis (Occasional Paper, No. 26). Ottawa, Canada: Industry Canada Research Publications Program.
45.
LernerG. (1971). The woman in American history. New York: Addison–Wesley Longman Publication Company.
46.
MinerJ.B., SmithN.R., & BrackerJ.S. (1992). Defining the inventor–entrepreneur in the context of established typologies. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 103–113.
47.
MirchandaniK. (1999). Feminist insight on gendered work: New directions in research on women and entrepreneurship. Gender Work & Organization, 6(4), 224–235.
48.
OrserB. (1997). The influence of intention, managerial experience and gender on small firm growth. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Bradford, England.
OrserB., FischerE., HooperS., ReuberR., & RidingA. (1999). Beyond borders. Canadian businesswomen in international trade. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada. Available at http://www.dfait–maeci.gc.ca/businesswomen/beyondborders–en.asp, accessed 12 May 2008.
51.
OrserB. & Hogarth–ScottS. (2003). Opting for growth: Gender dimensions of choosing enterprise development. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19(3), 284–300.
52.
OrserB., RidingA., StanleyJ., & DathanM. (2007). Gender challenges for women in the advanced technology sector. Proceedings, Canadian Council for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Kelowna, British Columbia, November 1–3.
53.
OrserB., RidingA., & TownsendJ. (2004). Exporting as a means of growth for women–owned Canadian SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 17(3), 153–174.
54.
OviattB. & McDougallP. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 29–41.
55.
PeitchinisS. (1989). Women at work: Discrimination and response. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Publishing.
56.
PenroseE. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
PressS. & WilsonS. (1978). Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73(364), 699–705.
58.
ReavleyM., LituchyT., & McClellandE. (2005). Exporting success: A two–country comparison of women entrepreneurs in international trade. International Journal of Entrepreneurial and Small Business, 2(1), 57–78.
59.
ReuberA. & FischerE. (1997). The influence of the management team's international experience on the internationalization behavior of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 807–825.
60.
RosaP. & HamiltonD. (1994). Gender and ownership in UK small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(1), 11–27.
61.
RuzzierM., HisrichR., & KonecnikM. (2007). Human capital and SME internationalization: A structural equation modeling study. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24(1), 15–29.
62.
SabuhoroJ.–B. & GervaisY. (2004). Factors determining the success or failure of Canadian establishments on foreign markets: A survival analysis approach. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada, Business and Trade Statistics Field.
63.
SeringhausR. (1993). Comparative marketing behaviour of Canadian and Austrian high–tech exporters. Management International Review, 33(3), 247–268.
64.
Statistics Canada. (2006). Women in Canada. A gender–based statistical report. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.
65.
StevensJ. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
TherrienP. & DoloreuxD. (2007). Innovation market–based or originality–based—Do they offer the same advantage on commercialization in Canadian service industries? Working paper, University of Ottawa School of Management.
67.
WatsonJ. & RobinsonS. (2003). Adjusting for risk in comparing the performance of male– and female–controlled SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 773–788.
68.
ZacharakisA. (1997). Entrepreneurial entry into foreign markets: A transaction cost perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(3), 23–39.
69.
ZahraS. (2005). A theory of international new ventures: A decade of research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 20–28.
