Regional economic development policy is recognized as a key tool governments use to foster economic prosperity. Whether specialization (or diversity) of economic activities should be a regional development policy goal is often debated. We address this question in a local–diversity context, by reviewing traditional arguments in its favor, supplemented with evidence for more entrepreneurial concepts like industrial symbiosis and Jacobs externalities. We show that the context of entrepreneurship matters more to policy than the type and form of resulting industries. Policies enabling entrepreneurs to exploit opportunities in a context of spontaneously evolved industrial diversity are better facilitators of regional development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AitkenH.J. (1985). The continuous wave: Technology and American radio 1900–1932. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
BatheltH. (2005). Geographies of production: Growth regimes in spatial perspective (II)—knowledge creation and growth in clusters. Progress in Human Geography, 29(2), 204–216.
6.
BatheltH., MalmbergA., & MaskellP. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.
7.
BaumolW. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
8.
BeerJ.J. (1981). The emergence of the German dye industry. New York: Arno Press (Original work published 1959).
9.
BreschiS. & LissoniF. (2001a). Localised knowledge spillovers vs innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered. Papers in Regional Science, 80(3), 255–273.
10.
BreschiS. & LissoniF. (2001b). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005.
11.
BrittonJ.H. (2004). High technology localization and extra–regional networks. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(5), 369–390.
12.
BrownK.A. (1988). Inventors at work. Interviews with 16 notable American inventors. Redmond, WA: Tempus Book of Microsoft Press.
13.
BunkerS.G. & CiccantellP.S. (2005). Globalization and the race for resources. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
ChapmanK. (2005). From “growth centre” to “cluster”: Restructuring, regional development, and the teesside chemical industry. Environment and Planning A, 37(4), 597–615.
ChertowM. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 313–337.
17.
ChinitzB. (1961). Contrasts in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh. American Economic Review, 51(2), 279–289.
18.
ChiuA.S. (2002). Ecology, systems, and networking. Walking the talk in Asia. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(2), 6–8.
19.
CortrightJ. (2006). Making sense of clusters: Regional competitiveness and economic development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/metro/mei/20060727_clusters.htm, accessed 12 March 2008.
20.
DesrochersP. (2000). De l'influence d'une ville diversifiée sur la combinaison de techniques. Typologie et analyse de processus. PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, Université de Montréal.
21.
DesrochersP. (2001a). Geographical proximity and the transmission of tacit knowledge. Review of Austrian Economics, 14(1), 63–83.
22.
DesrochersP. (2001b). Cities and industrial symbiosis: Some historical perspective and policy implications. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(4), 29–44.
23.
DesrochersP. (2001c). Eco–industrial parks: The case for private planning. The Independent Review: A Journal of Political Economy, 5(3), 345–371.
24.
DesrochersP. (2001d). Local diversity, human creativity and technological innovation. Growth and Change, 32(3), 369–394.
25.
DesrochersP. (2002a). Regional development and inter–industry recycling linkages: Some historical perspective. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 14(1), 49–65.
26.
DesrochersP. (2002b). Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter–firm recycling linkages: Historical evidence and policy implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(5), 1031–1057.
27.
DesrochersP. (2007). How did the invisible hand handle industrial waste? By–product development before the modern environmental era. Enterprise and Society, 8(2), 348–374.
28.
DesrochersP. & SautetF. (2004). Cluster–based economic strategy, facilitation policy and the market process. Review of Austrian Economics, 17(2/3), 233–245.
29.
DesrochersP. & HospersG.–J. (2007). Cities and the economic development of nations: An essay on Jane Jacobs’ contribution to economic theory. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 30(1), 115–130.
30.
DeutzP. & GibbsD. (2004). Eco–industrial development and economic development: Industrial ecology or place promotion?Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(5), 346–362.
31.
DevasC.S. (1901). Political economy (2nd ed., rewritten and enlarged). London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
32.
DickenP. & LloydP. (1990). Location in space. Theoretical perspectives in economic geography (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers Inc.
33.
DurantonG. & PugaD. (2000). Diversity and specialisation in cities: Why, where and when does it matter?Urban Studies, 37(3), 533–555.
34.
FeldmanM. (2000). Location and innovation: The new economic geography of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration. In ClarkG.L., FeldmanM.P., & GertlerM.S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 373–394). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
GarnerA. & KeoleianG.A. (1995). Industrial ecology: An introduction. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education.
36.
GlaeserE., KallalH., ScheinkmanJ., & ShleiferA. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.
37.
GoldfarbB. (2005). Diffusion of general–purpose technologies: Understanding patterns in the electrification of US manufacturing 1880–1930. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 745–773.
HansenN. (2002). Dynamic externalities and spatial innovation diffusion: Implications for peripheral regions. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 2(3), 260–271.
40.
HayekF.A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–30. (Reprinted in Individualism and Economic Order, 1948. Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
41.
HooverE.M. & GiarrataniF. (1984). An introduction to regional economics (3rd ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
42.
HounshellD. (1991-1984). From the American system to mass production, 1800–1932. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43.
JacobsJ. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.
44.
JacobsenN.B. (2006). Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark. A quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1/2), 239–255.
45.
JacobsenN.B. & AnderbergS. (2004). Understanding the evolution of industrial symbiotic networks. In Van Den BerghJ. & JanssenM.A. (Eds.), Economics of industrial ecology. Materials, structural change, and spatial scales (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
KeirM. (1919). The localization of industry. How it starts; why it grows and persists. The Scientific Monthly, 8(1), 32–48.
48.
KershawJ.B.C. (1928). The recovery and use of industrial and other waste. London: Ernest Benn Limited.
49.
KhanJ.H. & GhaniJ.A. (2004). Clusters and entrepreneurship: Implications for innovation in a developing economy. Journal of Development Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 221–238.
50.
KirznerI.M. (1979, February). The perils of regulation: A market–process approach. Occasional paper of the Law and Economics Center, University of Miami School of Law. (Reprinted in Discovery and the capitalist process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985)
51.
KollerT. (1918). The utilization of waste products: A treatise on the rational utilization, recovery, and treatment of waste products of all kinds (3rd revised ed., translated from the 2nd revised German ed.). New York: D. Van Nostrand Company.
52.
LipsettC. (1963-1951). Industrial wastes and salvage. Conservation and utilization. New York: The Atlas Publishing Co., Inc.
53.
LoweE.A. (1995, May 45). The Eco–Industrial Park: A business environment for a sustainable future. Paper presented at the conference Designing, Financing, and Building the Industrial Park of the Future, sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Institute, and the University of California at San Diego, San Diego.
54.
MaliziaE.E. & FeserE.J. (1999). Understanding local economic development. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
MinguzziA. & PassaroR. (2000). The network of relationships between the economic environment and the entrepreneurial culture in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 181–207.
58.
MinnitiM. (2004). Organization alertness and asymmetric information in a spin–glass model. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 637–658.
59.
MorganK. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography: Learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1), 3–21.
60.
PoleseM. (2005). Cities and national economic growth: A reappraisal. Urban Studies, 42(8), 1429–1451.
61.
PorterM. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
62.
PorterM. (1998). Location, clusters and the “new” microeconomics of competition. Business Economics, 33(1), 7–17.
63.
PorterM. (2000a). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.
64.
PorterM. (2000b). Location, clusters and company strategy. In ClarkG.L., GertlerM.S., & FeldmanM.P. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 253–274). New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
QuigleyJ.M. (1998). Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 127–138.
66.
RennerG.T. (1947). Geography of industrial localization. Economic Geography, 23(3), 167–189.
67.
RicardoD. (1821). The principles of political economy and taxation (3rd ed). London: John Murray. Available at: http://www.econlib.org/library/Ricardo/ricP.html, accessed 12 March 2008. (Original work published 1817)
68.
RochaH.O. (2004). Entrepreneurship and development: The role of clusters. Small Business Economics, 23(5), 363–400.
69.
RochaH.O. & SternbergR. (2005). Entrepreneurship: The role of clusters. Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence from Germany. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 267–292.
RosenfeldS. (2001, March 2930). Backing into clusters: Retrofitting public policies. Paper presented at the Integration Pressures: Lessons from Around the World, John F. Kennedy School Symposium, Harvard University. Available at: http://www.rtsinc.org/publications/Harvard4%20doc%20copy.pdf, accessed 12 March 2008.
72.
RosenthalS.S. & StrangeW. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In HendersonV. & ThisseJ. (Eds.). Handbook of urban and regional economics, volume 4 (pp. 2119–2172). New York: Elsevier.
73.
RossE.A. (1896). The location of industries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 10(2), 247–268.
74.
ShaneS. (2000). Prior knowledge, and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.
75.
SiegelP.B., JohnsonT.G., & AlwangJ. (1995). Regional economic diversity and diversification: Seeking a framework for analysis. Growth and Change, 26(2), 261–284.
76.
SimmondsP.L. (1876-1873). Waste products and undeveloped substances: A synopsis of progress made in their economic utilisation during the last quarter of a century at home and abroad (3rd ed.). London: Hardwicke and Bogue.
77.
SmilV. (2005). Creating the twentieth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
78.
TalbotF.A. (1920). Millions from waste. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company.
79.
UngerR.M. (2007). Free trade reimagined: The world division of labor and the method of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
80.
Van Der PanneG. & Van BeersC. (2006). On the Marshall–Jacobs controversy: It takes two to tango. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(5), 877–890.
81.
WheelerJ.O., MullerP.O., ThrallG.I., & FinkT.J. (1998). Economic geography. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
82.
WolfA., EklundM., & SöderströmM. (2007). Developing integration in a local industrial system—an explorative approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(6), 442–455.
