This article makes two contributions to our understanding of the core entrepreneurial activity of assembling resources to pursue an opportunity. First, a conceptual framework is presented to organize the research on resource mobilization. Second, a study is presented based upon interviews with a random sample of 48 entrepreneurs to identify the supporters whom the entrepreneurs considered to have been key to their success and the resources obtained from these individuals. Results indicate that maximizing the overall effectiveness of resource combinations is a complex undertaking involving trade–offs between the quantity and quality of available resources and the efficiency versus effectiveness of supporters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerP.S. & KwonS. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
2.
AldrichH. & WhettenD.A. (1981). Organization–sets, action–sets, and networks: Making the most of simplicity. In NystromP.C. & StarbuckW.H. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design: Vol. 1. Adapting organizations to their environments (pp. 385–408). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
4.
BennettR.J. & RobsonP.J.A. (1999). The use of external business advice by SMEs in Britain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(12), 155–180.
5.
BirleyS. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107–117.
6.
BrüderlJ. & PreisendörferP. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small Business Economics, 10(3), 213–225.
7.
BurtR.S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CaseJ. (1989). The origins of entrepreneurship. INC, 11(6), 51–63.
9.
ChrismanJ.J. (1999). The influence of outsider–generated knowledge resources on venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(4), 42–58.
10.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & ZahraS.A. (2003). Creating wealth in family firms through managing resources: Comments and extensions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 359–365.
11.
ColemanJ.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
12.
CookT.D. & CampbellD.T. (1979). Quasi–experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
13.
CooperA.C., FoltaT.B., & WooC.Y. (1995). Entrepreneurial information search. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(2), 107–120.
14.
CooperA.C., Gimeno–GasconF.J., & WooC.Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 371–395.
15.
DailyC.M. & DaltonD.R. (1993). Board of directors leadership and structure: Control and performance implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(3), 65–81.
16.
DoggettP. & HeppleL.W. (1995). Corporate banking survey 1995—England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. London: Mees Pierson MV. Cited in Bennett, R.J. & Robson, P.J.A. (1999). The use of external business advice by SMEs in Britain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(12), 155–180.
17.
DonckelsR. & LambrechtJ. (1997). The network position of small businesses: An explanatory model. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(2), 13–25.
18.
DubiniP. & AldrichH. (1991). Personal and extended networks are central to the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(5), 305–313.
19.
DuncanO.D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In ReissA.J.Jr., Occupations and social status (pp. 109–138). New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc.
20.
EhrlichS.B., NobleA.F., MooreT., & WeaverR.R. (1994). After the cash arrives: A comparative study of venture capital and private investor involvement in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 67–82.
21.
FreemanR.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
22.
FriedV.H. & HisrichR.D. (1995). The venture capitalist: A relationship investor. California Management Review, 37(2), 101–113.
23.
GibbA. (1990). Towards the building of entrepreneurial models of support for small business. Occasional Paper 9046, Durham University Business School.
24.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
GlaserB.G. & StraussA.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
26.
GormanM. & SahlmanW.A. (1989). What do venture capitalists do?Journal of Business Venturing, 4(4), 231–248.
27.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 6, 1360–1380.
28.
GreveA. & SalaffJ.W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1–22.
29.
GuppyL.N. (1984). Dissensus or consensus: A cross–national comparison of occupational prestige scales. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 9(1), 69–83.
30.
HansenE. (2001). Resource acquisition as a startup process: Initial stocks of social capital and organizational foundings. Available at http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/IV/IVB/html/IV–B.html, accessed April 29, 2007.
31.
HuseM. (1990). Board composition in small enterprises. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2(4), 363–373.
32.
JackS.L. & AndersonA.R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 467–487.
33.
JenssenJ.I. (2001). Social networks, resources and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2(2), 103–109.
34.
JickT.D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.
35.
KorunkaC., FrankH., LuegerM., & MuglerJ. (2003). The entrepreneurial personality in the context of resources, environment, and the startup process—A configurational approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 23–42.
36.
LandstromH. (1990). Co–operation between venture capital companies and small firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2(4), 345–362.
37.
LinN. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
38.
MacKinnonN.J. & LangfordT. (1994). The meaning of occupational prestige scores: A social psychological analysis and interpretation. Sociological Quarterly, 35(2), 215–245.
39.
MenziesT.V., BrennerG.A., FilionL.J., LowryL., PerreaultC., & RamangalahyC. (2000). Transnational entrepreneurship and bootstrap capitalism: Social capital, networks and ethnic minority entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the Second Biennial McGill Conference on International Entrepreneurship: Researching New Frontiers, Montreal.
40.
NakaoK. (1992). Occupational prestige. In BorgattaE.F. & BorgattaM.L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 1388–1391). New York: Macmillan.
41.
NakaoK., HodgeR.W., & TreasJ. (1990). On revising prestige scores for all occupations. GSS Methodological Report No. 69. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
42.
National Federation of Independent Business. (2002). Advice and advisors. NFIB National small business pollDennisWilliam J.Jr. (Ed.), 2(5). Washington, DC: NFIB Research Foundation.
43.
PinedaR.C., LernerL.D., MillerM.C., & PhillipsS.J. (1998). An investigation of factors affecting the information–search activities of small business managers. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 60–71.
44.
PolanyiM. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
45.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.
46.
SandbergW.R. & LoganJ.E. (1997). Small firm's competitive strategies and the firms’ reliance on resources acquired through networks. Proceedings of the 42nd World Conference, International Council for Small Business, San Francisco.
47.
SiebertS.E., KraimerM.L., & LidenR.C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–238.
48.
SirmonD.G. & HittM.A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.
49.
SooklalL. (1991). The leader as a broker of dreams. Human Relations, 44(8), 833–856.
50.
SooklalL. & HanlonD. (2002). A grounded leadership theory with insights into entrepreneurship. In ParryK.W. & MeindlJ.R. (Eds.), Grounding leadership theory and research: Issues, perspectives, and methods: Vol. 1. Research in Leadership Horizons Series, Centre for Creative Leadership (pp. 79–108). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
51.
SpearR. (2000). The nature of social entrepreneurship—Some findings. Paper presented at the Society for Third Sector Research, Fourth International Conference, Dublin.
52.
SpechtP.H. (1987). Information sources used for strategic planning decisions in small firms. American Journal of Small Business, 11(4), 21–34.
53.
StarrJ.A. & MacMillanI.C. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 79–92.
54.
StevensonH.H. (1989). A perspective on entrepreneurship. In StevensonH.H., RobertsM.J., & GrousbeckH.I. (Eds.), New business ventures and the entrepreneur (pp. 4–19). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
55.
StevensonW.B. & GreenbergD. (2000). Agency and social networks: Strategies of action in a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 651–678.
56.
Van SonderenE., OrmelJ., BrilmanE. & Linden van den HeuvellC. (1990). Personal network delineation: A comparison of the exchange, affective and role–relation approach. In KnipscheerK.C.P.M. & AntonucciT.C. (Eds.), Social network research: Substantive issues and methodological questions (pp. 101–120). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
57.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
58.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource–based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.
