Corporate venturing (CV) is said to be most productive as a path to superior corporate performance when practiced in a strategic manner. Unfortunately, considerable ambiguity exists concerning what it means in an organizational practice sense to strategically pursue CV. The result is a failure of many companies to fully leverage CV for strategic purposes. Based on a review of the CV literature and findings from a field study of 15 Swedish, U.K., and U.S. corporations, this article describes several models that depict the ways in which CV and business strategy coexist as organizational phenomena. Empirically derived propositions are offered to suggest how some companies are strategically engaged in their CV efforts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baden–FullerC. (1995). Strategic innovation, corporate entrepreneurship and matching outside–in to inside–out approaches to strategy research. British Journal of Management, 6, S3–S16.
2.
Baden–FullerC. & VolberdaH.W. (1997). Strategic renewal: How large complex organizations prepare for the future. International Studies of Management & Organization, 27(2), 95–120.
3.
BarneyJ.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
4.
BarringerB.R. & BluedornA.C. (1999). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Managment Journal, 20(5), 421–444.
5.
BettisR.A. & HittM.A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(Summer Special Issue), 7–19.
6.
BhideA. (1994). How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 150–161.
7.
BiggadikeR. (1979). The risky business of diversification. Harvard Business Review, 57(3), 103–111.
8.
BirkinshawJ. (1997). Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3), 207–229.
9.
BirkinshawJ., Van Basten BatenburgR., & MurrayG. (2002). Venturing to succeed. Business Strategy Review, 13(2), 10–17.
10.
BlockZ. & MacMillanI.C. (1993). Corporate venturing: Creating new businesses within the firm. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
11.
BourgeoisL.J.III (1980). Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 25–39.
12.
BowenH.K., ClarkK.B., HollowayC.A., Leonard–BartonD., & WheelwrightS.C. (1994). Regaining the lead in manufacturing. Harvard Business Review, 72(5), 108–109.
13.
BrazealD.V. & HerbertT.T. (1999). The genesis of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 29–45.
14.
BucklandW. (2003). Defining what corporate venturing actually is and what firms should do about it!Strategic Direction, 19(9), 2–4.
15.
BurgelmanR.A. (1983a). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 28(2), 223–244.
16.
BurgelmanR.A. (1983b). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Science, 29(12), 1349–1364.
17.
BurgelmanR.A. (1983c). A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the context of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 61–70.
18.
BurgelmanR.A. (1991). Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science, 2(3), 239–262.
19.
BurgelmanR.A. & DozY.L. (2001). The power of strategic integration. Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 28–38.
BurgelmanR.A. & SaylesL. (1986). Inside corporate innovation: Strategy, structure, and managerial skills. New York: The Free Press.
22.
CampbellA., BirkinshawJ., MorrisonA., & Van Basten BatenburgR. (2003). The future of corporate venturing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(1), 30–37.
23.
CarrierC. (1996). Intrapreneurship in small businesses: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 5–20.
24.
ChesbroughH. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(Spring), 35–41.
25.
ChittipeddiK. & WallettT.A. (1991). Entrepreneurship and competitive strategy. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 94–98.
26.
CohenW.M. & LevinthalD.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning sand innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
27.
CooperH. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
28.
CovinJ.G. (1991). Entrepreneurial versus conservative firms: A comparison of strategies and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 28(5), 439–462.
29.
CovinJ.G. & SlevinD.P. (2002). The entrepreneurial imperatives of strategic leadership. In HittM.A., IrelandR.D., CampS.M., & SextonD.L. (Eds.), Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset. (309–327). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
30.
De GeusA.P. (1988). Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review, 66(2), 70–74.
HamelG. (2000a). Reinvent your company. Fortune, 141(12), 99–118.
40.
HamelG. (2000b). Waking up IBM: How a gang of unlikely rebels transformed big blue. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 137–146.
41.
HamelG. (2000c). Leading the revolution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
42.
HamelG. & PrahaladC.K. (1993). Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 75–84.
43.
HittM.A. & IrelandR.D. (2000). The intersection of entrepreneurship and strategic management research. In SextonD. L. & LandstromH. (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship, (pp. 45–63). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
44.
HittM.A., IrelandR.D., CampS.M., & SextonD.L. (2002). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
45.
InkpenA. & ChoudhuryN. (1995, January 20). The seeking of strategy where it is not: Towards a theory of strategy absence. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 313–324.
46.
IpG., McWilliamsG., & McGeeS. (2000). Portfolio profits boost firms’ bottom line, but stir controversy. Wall Street Journal, pp. A1, A6.
KanterR.M. (1983). The change masters: Innovations for productivity in American corporations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
49.
KanterR.M. (1989). Swimming in newstreams: Mastering innovation dilemmas. California Management Review, 31(4), 45–69.
50.
KanterR.M. & RichardsonL. (1991). Engines of progress: Designing and running entrepreneurial vehicles in established companies—The enter–prize program at Ohio Bell, 1985–1990. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 209–229.
51.
KaragozogluN. & BrownW.B. (1988). Adaptive responses by conservative and entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5, 269–281.
52.
KimW.C. & MauborgneR. (1999). Creating new market space. Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 83–93.
53.
KnightG.A. (1997). Strategy and entrepreneurship in a developing free trade area: The case of the textiles/apparel industry in Canada. International. Journal of Management, 14(2), 237–249.
54.
KnightG.A. (2000). Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 12–32.
55.
KuczmarskiT.D. (1996a). Creating an innovative mind–set. Management Review, 85(November), 47–51.
56.
KuczmarskiT.D. (1996b). Innovation: Leadership strategies for the competitive edge. Chicago: NTC Publishing Group.
KuratkoD.F., HornsbyJ.S., NaffzigerD.W., & MontagnoR.V. (1993). Implementing entrepreneurial thinking in established organizations. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 58(1), 28–33.
59.
LaurieD.L. (2001). Venture catalyst: The five strategies for explosive corporate growth. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
60.
Lengnick–HallC.A. (1992). Strategic configuration and designs for corporate entrepreneurship: Exploring the relationship between cohesiveness and performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 9(2), 127–154.
61.
LiedtkaJ.M. & RosenblumJ.W. (1996). Shaping conversations: Making strategy, managing change. California Management Review, 39(1), 141–157.
MarkidesC. (1998). Strategic innovation in established companies. Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 31–42.
66.
MarkidesC. (1999). A dynamic view of strategy. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 55–63.
67.
MasonH. & RohnerT. (2002). The venture imperative: A new model for corporate innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
68.
McGrathR.G. & MacMillanI.C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
MeyerG.D. & HeppardK.A. (2000b). Entrepreneurial strategies: The dominant logic of entrepreneurship. In MeyerG.D. & HeppardK.A. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship as strategy (pp. 1–22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
71.
MilesM.P. & CovinJ.G. (2002). Exploring the practice of corporate venturing: Some common forms and their organizational implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(3), 21–40.
72.
MillerD. & FriesenP.H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1–25.
73.
MintzbergH. (1987a). The strategy concept I: Five P's for strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24.
74.
MintzbergH. (1987b). The strategy concept II: Another look at why organizations need strategies. California Management Review, 30(1), 25–32.
75.
MoroneJ. (1989). Strategic use of technology. California Management Review, 31(4), 91–110.
76.
MorrisM.H. (1998). Entrepreneurial intensity: Sustainable advantage for individuals, organization, and societies. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
77.
MorrisM.H. & KuratkoD.F. (2002). Corporate entrepreneurship. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
78.
MurrayJ.A. (1984). A concept of entrepreneurial strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 1–13.
79.
PageA.L. (1993). Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10, 273–290.
80.
SandbergW.R. (1992). Strategic management's potential contributions to a theory of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(3), 73–90.
81.
SatheV. (1988). From surface to deep corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management, 27(4), 389–411.
82.
SavageG.T. & BlackJ.A. (1995). Firm–level entrepreneurship and field research: The studies in their methodological context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19(3), 25–34.
83.
SegelodE. (1995). New ventures—The Swedish experience. Long Range Planning, 28(4), 45–53.
84.
SharmaP. & ChrismanJ.J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11–28.
85.
TakahashiD. (2000). Intel rolls dice on tech upstarts—and hits jackpot. Wall Street Journal, February 8, pp. C1, C3.
86.
The Economist. (1999, October 30). Jager's Gamble, p. 75.
87.
ThornhillS. & AmitR. (2001). A dynamic perspective of internal fit in corporate venturing. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 25–50.
88.
WhitneyD. (1997). Corporate new ventures at Procter & Gamble. Harvard Business School case no. 9–897–088. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Division.
89.
ZahraS.A. & GeorgeG. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.
90.
ZahraS.A., NielsenA.P., & BognerW.C. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competence development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 169–189.
