This article examines the role of trust and government agency in the creation and evolution of interorganizational cooperation among entrepreneurial ventures in general and the influence of trust on development trajectories in particular. The multiple–case approach used draws on five in–depth case studies adopting a focal firm perspective. Trust is shown to play a critical role in the formation, maintenance, and transformation of interorganizational cooperative relationships; whereas its absence results in discontinuation. Moreover, the results suggest that government agency may unintentionally destroy existing, well–functioning, interorganizational cooperative arrangements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndaleebS.S. (1995). Dependence relations and the moderating role of trust: Implications for behavioural intentions in marketing channels. Research in Marketing, 12, 157–172.
2.
AndersonJ.C. & NarusJ.A. (1986). Toward a better understanding of distribution channel working relationships. In BackhausK. & WilsonD. (Eds), Industrial marketing: A German–American perspective (pp. 320–336). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
3.
AxelrodR. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BeccatiniG. (1989). Sectors and/or districts: Some remarks on the conceptual foundations of industrial economics. In Goodman, Bamford, & Saynor (Eds), Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy. London: Routledge.
5.
BengtssonM. & KockS. (1999). Cooperation and competition in relationships between competitors in business networks. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 14(3), 178–194.
6.
BlankenburgD., ErikssonK., & JohanssonJ. (1996). Business networks and cooperation in international business relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5), 1033–1053.
7.
BrownB. & ButlerJ.E. (1995). Competitors as allies: A study of entrepreneurial networks in the U.S. wine industry. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(3), 57–67.
8.
BruscoS. (1982). The Emilian model: Productive decentralization and social integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6, 167–184.
9.
CookeP. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 945–974.
CurrallS.C. & InkpenA.C. (2002). A multilevel approach to trust in joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 479–495.
12.
DanermarkB., JakobsenL., KarlssonJ.C., & EkströmM. (2003). Explaining society: An introduction to critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge.
13.
Dei OttatiG. (1994). Trust, interlinking transactions and credit in the industrial district. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18, 529–546.
14.
Dei OttatiG. (2003). Exit, voice and the evolution of industrial districts: The case of post World War II economic development of Prato. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 501–522.
15.
DiGiovannaS. (1996). Industrial districts and regional development: A regulation approch. Regional Studies, 30(4), 373–386.
EbersM. & JarilloJ.C. (1997-1998) The construction, forms and consequences of industry networks. International Studies of Management and Organization, 27(4), 3–21.
18.
EmersonR.M. (1962). Power and dependence relationships. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.
19.
FarrellH. & HoltenA.–L. (2004). Collective goods in the local economy: The packaging machine cluster in Bologna. In CrouchC., LeGalèsP., TrigiliaC., & VoelzkowH. (Eds), Changing governance of local economies: Responses of European local production systems (pp. 23–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
FlanaganJ.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–335.
21.
FloridaR. (1995). Towards the learning region. Futures, 27(5), 527–536.
22.
FlyvbjergB. (1991). Rationality and power—the science of the concrete (Trans.). Academic Publishers (Original work in Danish, published 15 May 1991).
23.
FordD., GaddeL.–E., HaakanssonH., LundgrenA., SnehotaI., TurnbullP., et al. (1998). Managing business relationships. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
24.
FoxA. (1974). Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. London: Faber and Faber.
25.
GelsingL. & KnopP. (1991). Status of the network programme. Unpublished report for the National Agency of Industry and Trade, Aalborg.
26.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
27.
GulatiR. (1998). Alliances and qualitative methods in management research networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317.
28.
GummessonE. (1991). Qualitative methods in management research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
HåkanssonH. (1982). International marketing and purchases of industrial goods: An interaction approach. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
30.
HalinenA. (1994). Exchange relationships in professional services. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku, Finland.
31.
HarrisonB. (1992). Industrial districts: Old wine on new bottles?Regional Studies, 26(5), 469–483.
HillC.W. (1990). Cooperation, opportunism and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 15, 500–513.
34.
HugginsR. (2000). The Business of networks. Inter–firm interaction, institutional policy and the TEC experiment. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
35.
HughesG. (1998) The Danish business networking programme: An assessment. [Mimeo.
36.
JarilloJ.C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 31–41.
37.
KrugmanP. (1993). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
38.
LarssonA. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76–104.
39.
LaumannE.O., MarsdenP.V., & PrenskyD. (1983). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In BurtR.S. & MinorM.J. (Eds), Applied network analysis—a methodological introduction (pp. 18–34). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40.
LorenzoniG. & OrnatiO. (1988). Constellations of firma and new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 41–57.
41.
LuhmannN. (1979). Trust and power. New York: John Wiley.
42.
LundvallB.–Å. & JohnsonB. (1994). The learning economy. Journal of Industrial Studies, 1, 23–42.
43.
MadhokA. (1995). Opportunism and trust in joint venture relationships: An exploratory study and a model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, 57–74.
44.
MilesM.B. & HubermanA.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
MorganR.M. & HuntS.D. (1994). The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.
46.
OECD (1999). Boosting innovation: The cluster approach. Paris: OECD.
47.
ParkheA. (1993a). Strategic alliance structuring: A game–theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794–829.
48.
ParkheA. (1993b). Messy research, methodological predisposition and theory development in international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 227–268.
49.
ParksC.D. & HulbertL.G. (1995). High– and low–trusters’ responses to fear in a payoff matrix. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 718–730.
50.
PattonM.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
51.
PerryM. (1996). Research note: Network intermediaries and their effectiveness. International Small Business Journal, 14(4), 72–80.
52.
PioreM. & SabelC.F. (1984). The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books.
53.
PorterM.E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–34.
54.
PowellW.W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.
55.
PowellW.W. & DiMaggioP.J. (Eds) (1991). The new institutionalism in organisational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
PowellW.W. & Smith–DoerrL. (1994). Networks and economic life. In SmelserN.J. & SwedbergR. (Eds), Handbook of economics sociology (pp. 241–367). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
PutnamR.D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 4(13), 11–18.
58.
PykeF., BecattiniG., & SengenbergerW.R. (1990). Industrial districts and inter–firm cooperation in Italy. Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies.
59.
SaxenianA. (1996). Regional advantage. Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
SchmitzH. & MusyckB. (1994). Industrial districts in Europe: Policy lessons for developing countries. World Development, 22(6), 889–910.
61.
ScottA.J. (1992). The role of large producers in industrial districts: A case study of high technology systems houses in Southern California. Regional Studies, 26, 265–275.
62.
ShapiroD.L., SheppardB.H. & CheraskinL. (1992) Business on a handshake. Negotiation Journal, 8, 365–377.
63.
StorperM. & ChristophersonS. (1987). Flexible specialisation and regional industrial agglomerations—the case of the United State's moving picture industry. Annals Association of American Geography, 77(1), 104–117.
64.
StorperM. & ScottA.J. (1995). The wealth of regions—market forces and policy integratives in local and global context. Futures, 27, 505–526.
65.
SydowJ. & WindelerA. (2003). Knowledge, trust and control: Managing tensions and contradictions in a regional network of service firms. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33(2), 69–100.
66.
TsoukasH. (1989). The validity of ideographic research explanations. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 551–561.
67.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
68.
Van de VenA.H. & WalkerG. (1984). The dynamics of inter–organizational coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 598–621.
69.
ViemoseS. & ViemoseH.C. (1996). Evaluation of the network programme 1989–1992. Amphion Report. Copenhagen: Ministry for Trade and Industry.
70.
WelchL. (1991). The use of alliances by small firms in achieving internationalization. Scandinavian International Business Review, 1(2), 21–37.
71.
WilkinsonI. & MattssonL.G. (1994). Trade promotion policy from a network perspective: The case of Australia. Paper presented at the 10th IMP Conference, Groningen, the Netherlands.
72.
WilliamsonO.E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.
73.
WilliamsonO.E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1/2), 453–486.
74.
WilliamsonO.E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
75.
WilliamsonO.E. & OuchiK. (1981). The markets and hierarchies and visible hand perspectives. In Van de VenA. & JoyceW.F. (Eds), Perspectives on organization design and behaviour (pp. 347–370). New York: Wiley Interscience.
76.
YinR.K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
