AldrichH.A. & MartinezM.A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56.
2.
AmasonA. & SapienzaH. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4), 495–516.
3.
BoekerW. (1989). Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 489–515.
4.
BoekerW. (1997). Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 213–216.
5.
BranderJ.A., AmitR., & AntweilerW. (2002). Venture capital syndication: Improved venture selection versus the value–added hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11(3), 423–452.
6.
BrassD.J. (1992). Power in organizations: A social network perspective. In MooreG. & WhittG.A. (Eds), Research in Politics and Society (pp. 295–323). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
7.
BurtR.S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BygraveW.D. (1987). Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2), 139–154.
9.
BygraveW.D. (1988). The structure of investment networks in the venture capital industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2), 137–157.
10.
ColemanJ.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
CooperA.C. & BrunoA. (1977). Success among high technology firms. Business Horizons, 20(2), 16–22.
12.
CummingD.J. & WalzU. (2004). Private equity returns and disclosure around the world. Working Paper, Center for Financial Studies, Frankfurt.
13.
FriedV. & HisrichR. (1995). The venture capitalist: A relationship investor. California Management Review, 37(2), 101–113.
14.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
15.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
16.
HambrickD.C. & MasonP.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
17.
HoangH. & AntoncicB. (2003). Network based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.
18.
JensenM. & MecklingW. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
19.
LernerJ. (1994). The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management, 23(3), 16–27.
20.
LockettA. & WrightM. (2001). The syndication of venture capital investments. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 29(5), 375–390.
21.
MitchellF., ReidG., & TerryN. (1995). Post investment demand for accounting information by venture capitalists. Accounting and Business Research, 25(99), 186–196.
22.
NortonE. & TenenbaumB.H. (1993). The effects of venture capitalists’ characteristics on the structure of a venture capital deal. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(4), 32–41.
23.
RoureJ.B. & MaidiqueM.A. (1986). Linking pre–funding factors and high–technology venture success: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3), 295–306.
24.
SahlmanW.A. (1990). The structure and governance of venture capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 473–521.
25.
SörensonO. & StuartT.E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588.
26.
UcbasaranD., LockettA., WrightM., & WestheadP. (2003). Entrepreneurial founder teams: Factors associated with team member entry and exit. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 107–128.
27.
UzziB. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.
28.
UzziB. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 37–69.
29.
Van de VenA.H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 211–230.
30.
Van MuijenJ.J., KoopmanP., De WitteK., De CockG., SusanjZ., LemoineC.et al. (1999). Organizational culture: The focus questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(4), 551–568.
31.
WeinzimmerL.G. (1997). Top management team correlates of organizational growth in a small business context: A comparative study. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(3), 1–9.
32.
WiersemaM.F. & BantelK.A. (1993). Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 14(7), 485–504.
33.
WilsonR. (1968). The theory of syndicates. Econometrica, 36(1), 119–132.
34.
WrightM. & LockettA. (2003). The structure and management of alliances: Syndication in the venture capital industry. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2073–2102.
35.
WrightM. & RobbieK. (1998). Venture capital and private equity: A review of the literature. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 25(5 & 6), 521–570.
36.
WrightM., PruthiS., & LockettA. (2005). International venture capital research: From cross–country comparisons to crossing borders. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 1–31.