Social networks are an important source of information for entrepreneurs and small firms. In this study, we consider the influence of social networks on survey response rates from small firms, focusing on effects of trade association endorsement and regional affiliation. Our findings show that trade association endorsement has a positive effect on survey response rate. In addition, the demonstration of the researcher's social ties to the firm's region has a positive effect on survey response rate. Our results lead to several practical implications for survey research on small firms and on industrial populations in general. Targeted personal follow–up with managers in close geographic proximity to the sponsoring university(ies) appears to be a particularly cost–effective strategy to increase response rates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhujaG. (2000). The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 317–343.
2.
BakerM.J. (1990). Dictionary of marketing and advertising. New York: Nichol's Publishing.
3.
BarNirA. & SmithK.A. (2002). Interfirm alliances in small business: The role of social networks. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 219–232.
4.
BaruchY. (1999). Response rates in academic studies: A comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4), 421–438.
5.
BourgeoisL.J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Journal, 6(1), 29–40.
6.
BrushC.G., GreeneP.G., & HartM.M. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 64–78.
7.
ChurchA.H. (1993). Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta–analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(1), 62–79.
8.
CycyotaC.S. & HarrisonD.A. (2002a). Top manager responses to organizational surveys: When questioning executives, are networks the answer?Academy of Management Proceedings, Denver, August.
9.
CycyotaC.S. & HarrisonD.A. (2002b). Enhancing survey response rates at the executive level: Are employce– or consumer–level techniques effective?Journal of Management, 28(2), 151–176.
10.
DennisW.J.Jr., (2003). Raising response rates in mail surveys of small business owners: Results of an experiment. Journal of Small Business Management, 41, 278–296.
11.
DillmanD.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
DoloreuxD. (2004). Regional networks of small and medium sized enterprises: Evidence from the metropolitan area of Ottawa in Canada. European Planning Studies, 12, 173–189.
13.
EganB.L. (1996). Improving rural telecommunications infrastructure. Working paper prepared for the 1996 TVA Rural Telecommunication Workshop, TVA Rural Studies, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
14.
FrazierB.J. & NiehmL.S. (2004). Exploring business information networks of small retailers in rural communities. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9, 23–42.
15.
GreveA. & SalaffJ.W. (2003). Social network and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 1–22.
16.
HansenE.L. (1995). Entrepreneurial network and new organizational growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19, 7–19.
17.
HambrickD.C., GelekanyczM.A., & FredericksonJ.W. (1993). TOP management commitment to the status quo: Some test of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), 401–418.
18.
HeberleinT.A. & BaumgartnerR. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43, 447–462.
19.
KelmanH.C. (1961). The process of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57–78.
20.
NewbyR., WatsonJ., & WoodliffD. (2003). SME survey methodology: Response rates, data quality, and cost effectiveness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 163–172.
21.
OgilvyD. (1985). Ogilvy on advertising. New York: Vintage Books.
22.
PioreM.J. & SabelC.F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
23.
RochfordL. & VenableC.F. (1995). Surveying a targeted population segments: The effects of endorsement on mail questionnaire response rate. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3, 82–98.
24.
RothP.L. & BeVierC.A. (1998). Response rates in HRM/OB survey research: Norms and correlates, 1990–1994. Journal of Management, 24, 97–117.
25.
ScanduraT.A. & WilliamsE.A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1248–1264.
26.
SmithA.D., HoodJ.N., & HoughtonS.M. (2005). Network effects and small firm product offerings. Poster paper presented at the national Academy of Management Meeting, Hawaii, Entrepreneurship Division.
27.
TallmanS., JenkinsM., HenryN., & PinchS. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29, 258–272.
United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Electrification, & Administration. (1997). Statistical Report, Rural Telephone Borrowers. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents.
30.
YammarinoF.J., SkinnerS.J., & ChildersT.L. (1991). Understanding mail survey response behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(4), 613–629.
