The venture capital (VC) industry started in the United States and then spread worldwide. As it spread into other countries, there was a conscious attempt to copy industry practice from the U.S. However, venture capitalists in other countries are subject to different institutional forces that can impact their behavior. This article uses an institutional perspective to develop testable propositions on the impact of various institutions on venture capitalists’ behavior. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of an institutional theory perspective for VC research and public policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichH.E. & FiolC.M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.
2.
AllenF. & SongW.–L. (2003). Venture capital and corporate governance. Wharton Financial Institutions Center Working Paper 03–05.
3.
ArthursJ. & BuzenitzL. (2003). The boundaries and limitations of agency theory and stewardship theory in venture capital/entrepreneur relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 145–163.
4.
BarronJ.N., DobbinF.R., & JenningsP.D. (1986). American Journal of Sociology, 92, 350–383.
5.
BergerP.L. & LuckmannT. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
6.
BiggartN.W. & HamiltonG.G. (1992). On the limits of a firm based theory to explain business networks: The Western bias of neoclassical economics. In NohriaN. & EcclesG.G. (Eds), Networks and Organizations (pp. 471–490). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7.
BlackB.S. & GilsonR.J. (1998). Venture capital and the structure of capital markets: banks versus stock markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 47, 243–277.
8.
BlockZ. & MacMillanI.C. (1993). Corporate venturing. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
9.
BrutonG.D. & AhlstromD. (2003). An institutional view of China's venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 233–259.
10.
BrutonG.D., AhlstromD., & WanJ.C.C. (2003). Turnaround in Southeast Asian firms: Evidence from ethnic Chinese communities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 519–540.
11.
BrutonG.D., DattaniM., FungM., ChowC., & AhlstromD. (1999, Winter). Private equity in China: Differences and similarities with the Western model. Journal of Private Equity, 7–13.
12.
BrutonG.D., FriedV.H., & HisrichR.D. (2000). CEO dismissal in venture capital backed firms: Further evidence from an agency perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(4), 69–77.
13.
BusenitzL.W., GomezC., & SpencerJ.W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Interlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 994–1003.
14.
BygraveW.D. (1987). Syndication investment by venture capital firms: A network perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 972–989.
15.
CharvelR. & De YereguiJ.C. (2002). Private equity in Latin America: The Mexican case. Journal of Private Equity, 6(1), 30–42.
16.
ChenM. (2001). Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17.
ClaessensS., DjankovS., & LangL.H.P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112.
18.
DobbinF., EdelmanL., MeyerJ., ScottJ., & SwidlerA. (1988). The expansion of due process in organizations. In ZuckerL.G. (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 71–100). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
19.
DoreR.P. (1983). Goodwill and the spirit of market capitalism. British Journal of Sociology34, 459–482.
20.
DRI–WEFA (2002). Measuring the importance of venture capital and its benefits to the United States economy, study prepared for the National Venture Capital Association, Arlington, VA.
21.
ElangoB., FriedV., HisrichR.D., & PoloncheckA. (1995). How venture capital firms differ. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 157–180.
22.
FriedV.H. & HisrichR.D. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management, 23(3), 28–37.
23.
FriedV.H. & HisrichR.D. (1995). The venture capitalist: A relationship investor. California Management Review, 37(2), 101–113.
24.
GiffordS. (1997). Limited attention and the role of the venture capitalist. Journal of Business Venturing12, 459–482.
25.
GompersP.A. & LernerJ. (2001). The money of invention: How venture capital creates new wealth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
26.
GormanM. & SahlmanW.A. (1989). What do venture capitalists do?Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 231–249.
27.
GuptaU. (2000). Done deals. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
28.
HellmanT., LindseyL., & PuriM. (2004). Building relationships early: Banks in venture capital. NBER Working Paper No. 10535.
29.
HirschP.M. & LounsburyM. (1997). Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist40, 406–418.
30.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work–related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
HofstedeG. & BondM.H. (1988). Confucius and economic growth: New trends in cultural consequences. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–21.
32.
HoskissonR.E., EdenL., LauC.M., & WrightM. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 249–267.
33.
HurryD., MillerA.T., & BowmanE.H. (1992). Calls on high–technology: Japanese exploration of venture capital investments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 85–102.
34.
JengL.A. & WellsP.C. (2000). The determinants of venture capital funding: Evidence across countries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, 241–289.
35.
KalbersL.P. & FogartyT.J. (1998). Organizational and economic explanations of audit committee. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10, 129–151.
36.
KaoJ. (1993). The worldwide web of Chinese businesses. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 24–36.
37.
KuemmerleW. (2001). Comparing catalysts of change: Evolution and institutional differences in the venture capital industries in the U.S., Japan and Germany. In BurgelmanR. & ChesbroughH. (Eds), Research on technological innovation, management and policy (pp. 227–261). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
38.
La PortaR., Lopez–de SilanesF., ShleiferA., & VishnyR.W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
39.
La PortaR., Lopez–de SilanesF., ShleiferA., & VishnyR.W. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3–27.
40.
MacMillanI.C., KulowD.M., & KhoylianR. (1989). Venture capitalists’ involvement in their investments: Extent and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 27–47.
41.
ManigartS. (1994). The founding rate of venture capital firms in three European countries (1970–1990). Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 525–541.
42.
ManigartS., KorsgaardA., FolgerM., SapienzaH., & BaeyensK. (2001). The impact of trust on private equity contracts. In BygraveW.D., AutioE., BrushC.G., DavidssonP., GreenP.G., ReynoldsP.D., & SapienzaH.J. (Eds), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research 2001 (pp. 494–502). Babson Park, MA: Babson College.
43.
MayerC., SchoorsK., & YafehY. (2004). Sources of funds and investment activities of venture capital funds: Evidence from Germany, Israel, Japan and the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(3), 586–608.
44.
MorrisM.H., WatlingJ.W., & SchindehutteM. (2000). Venture capitalist involvement in portfolio companies: Insights from South Africa. Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 68–78.
45.
OogheH., ManigartS., & FassinY. (1991). Growth patterns of the European venture capital industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(6), 381–404.
46.
OrruM., BiggartN.W., & HamiltonG.G. (1991). Organizational isomorphism in East Asia. In PowellW.W. & DiMaggioP.J. (Eds), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 361–389). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
PerkinsD.H. (2000). Law, family ties and the East Asian way of business. In HarrisonL. & HuntingtonS. (Eds), Culture matters: How values shape human progress (pp. 232–243). New York: Basic Books.
48.
PfefferJ. & SalancikG.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource–dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
49.
PyeL.C. (2000). Asian values: From dynamos to dominoes. In HarrisonL. & HuntingtonS. (Eds), Culture matters: How values shape human progress (pp. 244–255). New York: Basic Books.
50.
ReinerM.L. (1989). The transformation of venture capital: A history of venture capital organizations in the United States. University of California at Berkeley, unpublished doctoral dissertation.
51.
ReynoldsP.D., BygraveW.D., AutioE., CoxL.W., & HayM. (2002). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2002 executive report. London: Babson College, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation & London Business School.
52.
ReynoldsP.D., HayM., BygraveW.D., CampS.M., & AutioE. (2000). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2000 executive report. London: Babson College & London Business School.
53.
SahlmanW.A. (1990). The structure and governance of venture capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 473–521.
54.
SapienzaH.J. (1992). When do venture capitalists add value?Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 9–27.
55.
SapienzaH.J. & GuptaA.K. (1994). The impact of agency risks and task uncertainty in venture capitalist–CEO interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1618–1632.
56.
SapienzaH.J., ManigartS., & VermeirW. (1996). Venture capital governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 439–469.
57.
SapienzaH.J. & TimmonsJ.A. (1989). The roles of venture capitalists in new ventures: What determines their importance?Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 74–78.
58.
ScottW.R. (1995a). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
59.
ScottW.R. (1995b). Introduction: Institutional theory and organizations. In ScottW.R. & ChristenS. (Eds), The institutional construction of organizations (pp. xi–xxiii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
60.
SorensonO. & StuartT.E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1546–1588.
61.
SuchmanM.C. (1995). Localism and globalism in institutional analysis. In ScottW.R. & ChristenS. (Eds), The institutional construction of organizations (pp. 39–93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
62.
TsangE. & WallsW. (1998). Can Guanxi be a source of competitive advantage for doing business in China. Academy of Management Executive, 2(2), 64–73.
63.
WellsC. & GriecoM. (1993). Spinning a web? Networking the technical convergence of Europe. Organization Studies, 14, 621–638.
64.
WrightM., LockettA., & PruthiS. (2002). Internationalization of Western venture capitalists into emerging markets: Risk assessment and information in India. Small Business Economics, 19(1), 13–29.
65.
WrightM., LockettA., SapienzaH., & PruthiS. (2002). Venture capital investors, valuation and information: A comparative study of the U.S., Hong Kong, India and Singapore. Venture Capital, 4, 237–253.
66.
WrightM., ThompsonS., & RobbieK. (1992). Venture capital and management–led leveraged buy–outs: A European perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 47–71.
67.
WurglerJ. (2000). Financial markets and the allocation of capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 187–214.
68.
ZaltmanG., DuncanR., & HolbekJ. (1973). Innovation and organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
