The family firm resource–divestment model by Sharma and Manikutty (2004) is extended into a longitudinal model of family firm resource management. Resource accumulation is included as an additional dependent variable, and the influences of family structure, family involvement, and cultural variables are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvarezS.A. & BarneyJ.B. (2004). Organizing rent generation and appropriation: Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 621–635.
2.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
3.
BaronR.A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other persons. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275–294.
4.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & SteierL.P. (2002). The influence of national culture and family involvement on entrepreneurial perceptions and performance at the state level. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 113–130.
5.
ChuaJ.H., ChrismanJ.J., & SharmaP. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39.
6.
CyertR.M. & MarchJ.G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd. ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
7.
DierickxI. & CoolK. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1514.
8.
GalloM.A. & SveenJ. (1991). Internationalizing the family business: Facilitating and restraining factors. Family Business Review, 4(2), 181–190.
9.
GersickK.E., DavisJ.A., HamptonM.M., & LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
HabbershonT.G. & WilliamsM. (1999). A resource–based framework for assessing the strategic advantage of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1–25.
11.
HabbershonT.G., WilliamsM., & MacMillanI.C. (2003). A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 451–465.
12.
HarveyM. & EvansR.E. (1994). Family business and multiple levels of conflict. Family Business Review, 7(4), 331–348.
13.
HofstedeG. (2001). Cultures consequences: Comparing values, behavior, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
KellermannsF.W. & EddlestonK. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 209–228.
15.
KellermannsF.W. & FloydS.W. (2005). Strategic consensus and constructive confrontation: Unifying forces in the resource accumulation process. In S.W. Floyd, J. Ross, C. Jacobs, & F.W. Kellermanns (Eds), Innovating strategy process, 149–162, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
16.
KellyL.M., AthanassiouN., & CrittendenW.F. (2000). Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family–owned firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27–42.
17.
Kets de VriesM.F.R. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59–71.
18.
KingA.W. & ZeithamlC.P. (2001). Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 75–99.
19.
MakadokR. (2001). Toward a synthesis of the resource–based and dynamic–capability view of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387–401.
20.
PostJ.E. (1993). The greening of the Boston Park Plaza Hotel. Family Business Review, 6(2), 131–148.
21.
PriemR.L. & ButlerJ.E. (2001). Is the resource–based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40.
22.
ReedR. & DeFillippiR. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15, 88–102.
23.
SchulzeW.S., LubatkinM.H., & DinoR.N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among inside directors at family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179–194.
24.
SharmaP. & ChrismanJ.J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11–27.
25.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ.J., & ChuaJ.H. (2003). Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 667–687.
26.
SharmaP. & ManikuttyS. (2005). Strategic divestment in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 293–311.
27.
ShepherdD.A. & ZacharakisA. (2000). Structuring family business succession: An analysis of the future leader's decision making. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(4), 25–39.
28.
SirmonD.G. & HittM.A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.
29.
TagiuriR. & DavisJ.A. (1992). On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5(1), 43–62.
30.
ToddE. (1985). The explanation of ideology, family structures, and social systems. Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.
31.
VeigaJ.F., FloydS., & DechantK. (2001). Towards modeling the effects of national culture on IT implementation and acceptance. Journal of Information Technology, 16(3), 3–12.
