Joseph Schumpeter's work has long been regarded as a seminal contribution to entrepreneurship theory. However, relatively little attention has been given to exploring the sociological implications of his insights. This article examines Schumpeter's early writings on the entrepreneur and focuses on the apparent contradiction between his understanding of the inhibitory effect of social control and the entrepreneur's strength of will. This tension is resolved by recourse to contemporary social theory of interaction and emotion. A synthesis of these works produces two hypothetical modes of entrepreneurial action. These are elaborated and their implications for the understanding of entrepreneurship discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarbaletJ. (1999). Boredom and social meaning. British Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 631–646.
2.
BarnesB. (1995). The elements of social theory. London: UCL Press.
BransonR. (1999). Losing my virginity. London: Virgin.
7.
BriklinD. (2001). Natural–born entrepreneur. Harvard Business Review, Sept., 53–59.
8.
BroucekF. (1991). Shame and the self. London: Guilford.
9.
BrownH. & BroeskeP. (1997). Howard Hughes. London: Warner.
10.
ChellE., HaworthJ., & BrearleyS. (1991). The entrepreneurial personality. London: Routledge.
11.
CollinsR. (1990). Stratification, emotional energy and transient emotions. In KempnerT. (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions, pp. 27–57. Albany: State University of New York.
12.
CollinsR. (2000). Situational stratification: A micro–macro theory of inequality. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 17–43.
13.
CrickM. (2000). Jeffrey archer: Stranger than fiction. London: Fourth Estate.
14.
DelmarF. (2000). The psychology of the entrepreneur. In CarterS. & Jones–EvansD. (Eds.), Enterprise and small business, pp. 132–154. London: Prentice Hall.
15.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
16.
GilbertP. (1998). What is shame? In GilbertP. & AndrewsB. (Eds.), Shame: Interpersonal behaviour, psychopathology and culture, pp. 3–37. Oxford: OUP.
17.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma. London: PrenticeHall.
18.
GranovetterM. (2000). The economic sociology of firms and entrepreneurs. In SwedbergR. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, pp. 244–276. Oxford: OUP.
Kets de VriesM. (1996). The anatomy of the entrepreneur. Human Relations, 49(7), 853–884.
25.
LangloisR. (1991). Schumpeter and the obsolescence of the entrepreneur. Paper presented at the History of Economics Society annual meeting, Boston.
26.
LawlerE. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321–352.
27.
McClellandD. (1965). Need achievement and entrepreneurship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 389–392.
28.
MitchellR., BusenitzL., LantT., McDougallP., MorseE., & SmithJ. (2002). Towards a theory of entrepreneurial cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 93–104.
29.
NathansonD. (Ed.). (1987). The many faces of shame. London: Guilford.
30.
ScheffT. (2003). Male emotions/relationships and violence. Human Relations, 56(6), 727–749.
31.
ScheffT. (1990). Micro–sociology. Chicago: UCP.
32.
ScheffT. (1997). Emotions, the social bond and human reality. Cambridge: CUP.
33.
SchelerM. (1970). The nature of sympathy. Hamden: Archon.
34.
SchumpeterJ. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
35.
SchumpeterJ. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: George Allen and Unwin.
36.
Summers–EfflerE. (2002). The micro potential for social change: Emotion, consciousness and social movement formation. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 41–60.
37.
SwedbergR. (Ed.). (2000). The social science view of entrepreneurship. In SwedbergR. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, pp. 7–44. Oxford: OUP.
38.
TangneyJ. & DearingR. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford.
39.
TomkinsS. (1995). Script theory and nuclear scripts. In SedgwickE. & FrankA. (Eds.), Shame and its sisters: A silvan tomkins reader, pp. 312–388. London: DUP.
40.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society. Volume II. Berkley: UCP.
