Although successor commitment toward family business has been identified as a key desirable attribute, commitment has been treated as a unidimensional construct in family business research. Drawing on the organizational commitment literature, we propose four bases of successor commitment to family firm—affective (based on perceived desire), normative (based on perceived sense of obligation), calculative (based on perceived opportunity costs involved), and imperative (based on perceived need). A model of antecedents and expected behavioral outcomes of each of these bases of commitment is developed. Related propositions are presented, as are the contributions to the literature, research and practical implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldrichH.E. & CliffJ.E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596.
2.
AldrichH.E. & LangtonN. (1998). Human resource management and organizational life cycles. In Paul Reynolds et al. (eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Babson Park, MA: Babson College, Center for Entrepreneurial Studies.
3.
AllenN.J. & MeyerJ.P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252–276.
4.
AsakawaK. (2001). Family socialization practices and their effects on the internalization of educational values for Asian and White American adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 184–194.
5.
AshforthB.E. & MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
6.
AstrachanJ.H., ZahraS.A., & SharmaP. (2003). Family–Sponsored Ventures. Presented in New York on April 29, 2003 at the First Annual Global Entrepreneurship Symposium: The Entrepreneurial Advantage of Nations. http://www.emkf.org/pdf/UN_family_sponsored_report.pdf.
7.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
BansalH.S., IrvingP.G., & TaylorS. (forthcoming). A three component model of customer commitment to service providers. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science.
9.
BarlingJ. (1990). Employment, stress and family functioning. New York: Wiley.
10.
BarlingJ., KellowayE.K., & BremermanE.H. (1991). Preemployment predictors of union attitudes: The role of family socialization and work beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 725–731.
11.
BarnesL.B. (1988). Incongruent hierarchies: Daughters and younger sons as company CEOs. Family Business Review, 1(1), 9–21.
12.
BeckerT.E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 232–244.
13.
BlauG. (2001). Testing the discriminant validity of occupational entrenchment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 85–93.
14.
BolinoM.C., TurnleyW.H., & BloodgoodJ.M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505–522.
15.
BriefA.P. & MotowidloS.J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725.
16.
BurkartM., PanunziF., & ShleiferA. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 63(5), 2167–2201.
17.
CannellaA.Jr. & ShenW. (2001). So close and yet so far: Promotion versus exit for CEO heirs apparent. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 252–270.
18.
CarsonK.D., CarsonP.P., & BedeianA.G. (1995). Development and construct validation of a career entrenchment measure. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68, 301–320.
19.
ChauT.T. (1991). Approaches to succession in East Asian business organizations. Family Business Review, 4(2), 161–179.
20.
ChrismanJ.J., ChuaJ.H., & SharmaP. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11(1), 19–34.
21.
Deloitte & ToucheSurvey (1999). Are Canadian family businesses an endangered species: The first success readiness survey of Canadian family–owned business. Conducted by Deloitte & Touche Centre for Tax Education and Research at the University of Waterloo, http://www.deloitte.ca.
22.
DemsetzH. & LehnK. (1995). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155–1177.
23.
DumasC., DupuisJ.P., RicherF., & CyrL. St. (1995). Factors that influence the next generation's decision to take over the family firm. Family Business Review, 8(2), 99–120.
24.
DunhamR.B., GrubeJ.A., & CastenadaM.B. (1994). Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 370–380.
25.
DyckB., MauwsM., StarkeF.A., & MischkeG.A. (2002). Passing the baton: The importance of sequence, timing, technique, and communication in executive succession. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 143–162.
26.
DyerW.G. (1986). Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family transitions. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
27.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
GildingM. (2000). Family business and family change: Individual autonomy, democratization, and the new family business institutions. Family Business Review, 13(3), 239–249.
30.
HabbershonT.G. & AstrachanJ.H. (1997). Perceptions are reality: How family meetings lead to collective action. Family Business Review, 10(1), 37–52.
31.
HabbershonT.G. & WilliamsM.L. (1999). A resource–based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25.
32.
HandlerW.C. (1989). Managing the family firm succession process: The next generation family member's experience. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston University.
33.
HerscovitchL. & MeyerJ.P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three–component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 474–487.
34.
IrvingP.G., ColemanD.F., & CooperC.L. (1997). Further assessments of a three–component model of occupational commitment: Generalizability and differences across occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 444–452.
35.
IssacharoffS. (1998). Can there be a behavioral law and economics?Vanderbilt Law Review, 51, 1729–1745.
36.
KahnemanD., KnetschJ.L., & ThalerR.H. (1990). Experimental tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325–1348.
37.
KeatingN.C. & LittleH.M. (1997). Choosing the successor in New Zealand family farms. Family Business Review, 10(2), 157–171.
38.
KoJ.–W., PriceJ.L., & MuellerC.W. (1997). Assessment of Meyer and Allen's three–component model of organizational commitment in South Korea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 961–973.
39.
KnetschJ.L. (1989). The endowment effect and evidence of nonreversible indifference curves. American Economic Review, 79, 1277–1284.
40.
LearnedK.E. (1995). The creation of firm resources: A native ethnography. Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas Tech University.
41.
LevinsonH. (1971). Conflicts that plague family businesses. Harvard Business Review, March–April, 90–98.
42.
LeytonE. (1970). Composite descent groups in Canada. In C.C. Harris (ed.), Readings in kinship in urban societies, 179–186. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
43.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
LobelS.A. (1991). Allocation of investment in work and family roles: Alternative theories and implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 507–521.
45.
LuthansF., BaackD., & TaylorL. (1987). Organizational commitment: Analysis and antecedents. Human Relations, 40, 219–236.
46.
MaloneS.C. & JensterP.V. (1992). The problem of plateaued owner manager. Family Business Review, 5(1), 25–41.
47.
MutualMass (1995). Family Business Survey. Springfield, MA.
48.
McGeeG.W. & FordR.C. (1987). Two (or more?) dimensions of organizational commitment: Re–examination of the affective and continuance commitment scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 638–642.
49.
McGivernC. (1978). The dynamics of management succession. Management Decision, 16, 32–46.
50.
MeyerJ.P. & AllenN.J. (1991). A three–component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
51.
MeyerJ.P., AllenN.J., & GellatlyI.R. (1990). Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time–lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 710–720.
52.
MeyerJ.P. & HerscovitchL. (2001). Toward a general model of commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299–326.
53.
MeyerJ.P., StanleyD.J., HerscovitchL., & TopolnytskyL. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta–analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52.
54.
MillarD. (1995). Transcript of interview conducted with family business manager Tim.
55.
MillarD. (1995a). Transcript of interview conducted with family business manager Larry.
56.
MorrisonE.W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee's perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1543–1567.
57.
MorrowP.C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 486–500.
58.
MortimerJ.T., LorenceJ., & KumkaD.S. (1986). Work, family and personality: Transition to adulthood. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
59.
NahapietJ. & GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
OrganD.W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In StawB.W. and CummingsL.L. (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 12, 43–72. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
62.
ReichersA.E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 465–476.
63.
RosenblattP.C., De MikL., AndersonR.M., & JohnsonP.A. (1985). The family in business: Understanding and dealing with the challenges entrepreneurial families face. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
64.
SchulzeW.S., LubatkinM.H., DinoR.N., & BuchholtzA.K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99–116.
65.
SharmaP. (1997). Determinants of the satisfaction of the primary stakeholders with the succession process in family firms. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Calgary.
66.
SharmaP. & RaoS.A. (2000). Successor attributes in Indian and Canadian family firms: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 13(4), 313–330.
67.
ShepherdD.A. & ZacharakisA. (2000). Structuring family business succession: An analysis of the future leader's decision making. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Summer, 24(4), 25–39.
68.
SirmonD.G. & HittM.A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27(4), 339–358.
69.
StewartA. (1990). The bigman metaphor for entrepreneurship: A “library tale” with morals on alternatives for further research. Organization Science, 1, 143–159.
70.
StewartA. (2003). Help one another, Use one another: Toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 27(4), 383–396.
71.
StinchcombeA.L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J.G. March (ed.), Handbook of organizations, 142–193. Chicago: Rand McNally.
72.
TajfelH. & TurnerJ.C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (eds.), Psychology and intergroup relations, 2nd ed., 7–24. Chicago: Nelson–Hall.
73.
ThalerR.H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1, 39–60.
74.
ToddE. (1985). The explanation of ideology, family structures, and social systems. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
75.
Van DyneL. & CummingsL.L. (1990). Extra–role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. In L.L. Cummings & B.W. Staw (eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 29–78. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
76.
Van DyneL., GrahamJ.W., & DieneschR.M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802.
77.
VintonK.L. (1998). Nepotism: An interdisciplinary model. Family Business Review, 11(4), 297–303.
78.
WardJ.L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
79.
WeickK. (1979). Enactment and organizing. In K. Weick (ed.), The social psychology of organizing. New York: Random House.
80.
WienerY. & VardiY. (1980). Relationships between job, organization, and career commitments and work outcomes: An integrative approach. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 26, 81–96.
