Tens of thousands of families have been relocated from public housing in the last decade through the HOPE VI redevelopment initiative. Analyzing in–depth interviews with 41 families who were relocated from a severely distressed public housing development, I explore how neighborhood–based social capital is drawn upon for safety by examining how people kept safe in public housing, and what happens when these social ties are taken away through forced relocation. I find that their relatively new status in these neighborhoods translates into less socializing and weaker local ties. Moreover, since they counted on social ties for protection previously, this lack of integration leaves a substantial portion feeling more vulnerable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonE.1990. Streetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
AndersonE.1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
3.
BursikR. J., and GrasmickH. G.1993. Neighborhoods and Crime: the Dimensions of Effective Community Control. New York: Lexington.
4.
Clampet–LundquistS.2004. “HOPE VI Relocation: Moving to New Neighborhoods and Building New Ties,” Housing Policy Debate15(2), 415–447.
5.
ColemanJ. S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology94(Supplement), S95–S120.
6.
EriksonK.1976. Everything in its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Simon and Schuster.
7.
FeldmanR. M., and StallS.2004. The Dignity of Resistance: Women Residents'Activism in Chicago Public Housing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
GansH.1962, 1982. The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian–Americans. New York: The Free Press.
9.
GuestA. M., CoverJ. K., MatsuedaR. L., and KubrinC. E.2006. “Neighborhood Context and Neighboring Ties,” City & Community5(4), 363–385.
10.
KasardaJ. D., and JanowitzM.1974. “Community Attachment in Mass Society,” American Sociological Review39(3), 328–339.
11.
KasinitzP., and HillyardD.1995. “The Old–Timers'Tale: the Politics of Nostalgia on the Waterfront,” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography24(2), 139–164.
12.
KlingJ. R., LiebmanJ. B., and KatzL. F.2007. “Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects,” Econometrica75(1), 83–119.
13.
KrugerD. J., HutchisonP., MonroeM. G., ReischlT., and Morrel–SamuelsS.2007. “Assault Injury Rates, Social Capital, and Fear of Neighborhood Crime,” Journal of Community Psychology35(4), 438–498.
14.
MajorsR., and BillsonJ. M.1992. Cool Pose: the Dilemmas of Black Manhood in America. New York: Lexington Books.
15.
MannP. H.1954. “The Concept of Neighborliness,” American Journal of Sociology60, 163–168.
16.
MerryS. E.1981. Urban Danger: Life in a Neighborhood of Strangers. Philadelphia: Temple University.
17.
PattilloM.1998. “Sweet Mothers and Gangbangers: Managing Crime in a Black Middle–Class Neighborhood,” Social Forces76(3), 747–774.
18.
Philadelphia Health Management Corporation, 2000. W.E.B. DuBois Towers Redevelopment Project Needs Assessment, Final Report, April 20.
19.
PopkinS., and CoveE.2007. Safety is the Most Important Thing: How HOPE VI Helped Families. Brief 2. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
20.
PopkinS., GwiasdaV., OlsonL., RosenbaumD., and BuronL.2000. The Hidden War: Crime and the Tragedy of Public Housing in Chicago. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
21.
PopkinS., KatzB., CunninghamM., BrownK., GustafsonJ., and TurnerM.2004. A Decade of HOPE VI: Research Findings and Policy Challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
22.
PortesA.1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology,” Annual Review of Sociology24, 1–24.
23.
RainwaterL.1966. “Fear and the House–as–Haven in the Lower Class,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners32(1), 23–31.
24.
RainwaterL.1970. Behind Ghetto Walls: Black Families in a Federal Slum. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
25.
SampsonR.1991. “Linking the Micro– and Macrolevel Dimensions of Community Social Organization,” Social Forces70(1), 43–64.
26.
SampsonR., RaudenbushS., and EarlsF.1997. “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy,” Science277(15 August), 918–924.
27.
SpenceL.1993. “Rethinking the Social Role of Public Housing,” Housing Policy Debate4(3), 355–368.
28.
SpencerM. B., CunninghamM., and SwansonD. P.1995. “Identity as Coping: Adolescent African–American Males'Adaptive Responses to High–Risk Environment,” in HarrisH., BlueH., and GriffithE., (eds.), Racial and Ethnic Identity: Psychological Development and Creative Expression, pp. 31–52. New York: Routledge Press.
29.
StackC.1974. All Our Kin. New York: Basic Books.
30.
SuttlesG.1968. The Social Order of the Slum: Ethnicity and Territory in the Inner City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
SwidlerA.1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies,” American Sociological Review51, 273–286.
32.
TaylorR.1996. “Neighborhood Responses to Disorder and Local Attachments: the Systemic Model of Attachment, Social Disorganization, and Neighborhood Use Value,” Sociological Forum11(1), 41–74.
33.
TaylorR., GottfredsonS., and BrowerS.1984. “Block Crime and Fear: Defensible Space, Local Social Ties, and Territorial Functioning,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency21(4), 303–331.
ValeL.1997. “Empathological Places: Residents'Ambivalence Toward Remaining in Public Housing,” Journal of Planning Education and Research16, 159–175.
36.
VenkateshS. A.1997. “An Invisible Community: Inside Chicago's Public Housing,” American Prospect34(Sept–Oct.), 35–40.
37.
VenkateshS. A.2000. American Project: the Rise and Fall of a Modern Ghetto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
YoungA.Jr. 1999. “The (non)Accumulation of Capital: Explicating the Relationship of Structure and Agency in the Lives of Poor Black Men,” Sociological Theory17(2), 201–227.
