Inner–ring suburbs initially built in the postwar period and before have evolved into places with varied characteristics, assets, and problems. Analyzing a sample of 1,742 inner–ring suburbs nationwide, this article identifies five different types: “vulnerable;”“ethnic;”“lower income and mixed;”“old;” and “middle class.” This typology indicates that inner–ring suburbs, often perceived as homogenous entities, are in fact places largely differentiated by issues of class, race, and ethnicity. as this article demonstrates, the identification of these different types of inner–ring suburbs reveals much about suburban transformation, stability, and decline in the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbotC.1987. The New Urban America: Growth and Politics in Sunbelt Cities. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
2.
BeauregardR.2006. When American Became Suburban. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
BierT.2001. “Moving Up, Filtering Down: Metropolitan Housing Dynamics and Public Policy,” A discussion paper prepared for the Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
5.
BollensS. A.1988. “Municipal Decline and Inequality in American Suburban Rings, 1960 to 1980,” Regional Studies22(4), 277–285.
6.
CholdinH. M., HansonC., and BohrerR.1980. “Suburban Status Instability,” American Sociological Review45, 972–983.
7.
CooperD. R., and SchindlerP. S.2003. Business Research Methods. 8th ed. New York: McGraw–Hill Higher Education.
FishmanR.1987. Bourgeois Utopias: the Rise and Fall of Suburbia. New York: Basic Books.
10.
FreyW. H.2003. “Melting Pot Suburbs: a Study of Suburban Diversity,” in KatzB. and LangR.E. (eds.), Redefining Urban and Suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000, vol. 1, pp. 155–180. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11.
GalsterG.1990. “Racial Steering by Real Estate Agents: Mechanisms and Motives,” The Review of Black Political Economy19(1), 39–63.
12.
GarreauJ.1991. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Anchor Books.
13.
HanlonB.2008. “The Decline of Older, Inner Suburbs in Metropolitan America,” Housing Policy Debate19(3), 423–455.
14.
HanlonB., and VicinoT. J.2007. “The Fate of Inner Suburbs: Evidence from Metropolitan Baltimore,” Urban Geography28(3), 249–275.
15.
HanlonB., VicinoT. J., and ShortJ. R.2006. “The New Metropolitan Reality: Rethinking the Traditional Model,” Urban Studies43(112), 2129–2143.
16.
HillR. C.1974. “Separate and Unequal: Governmental Inequality in the Metropolis,” The American Political Science Review68(4), 1557–1568.
17.
HollowayS. R.1998. “Exploring the Neighborhood Contingency of Race Discrimination in Mortgage Lending in Columbus, Ohio,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers88(2), 252–276.
18.
HudnutW.2003. Halfway to Everywhere: a Portrait of America's First–Tier Suburbs. Washington, DC: The Urban Land Institute.
19.
KlineP.1994. An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. London: Routledge.
20.
KnoxP.2008. Metroburbia USA. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
LeeS.2005. Metropolitan Growth Patterns’ Impact on Intra–Regional Spatial Differentiation and Inner–Ring SuburbanDecline: Insights for Smart Growth. Ph.D. dissertation, College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
23.
LeighN. G., and LeeS.2005. “Philadelphia's Space in Between: Inner–Ring Suburb Evolution,” Opolis1(1), 13–32.
24.
LewisR. D.2004. Manufacturing Suburbs: Building Work and Home on the Metropolitan Fringe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
LiW.1998. “Anatomy of a New Ethnic Settlement: the Chinese Ethnoburb in Los Angeles,” Urban Studies75, 479–501.
26.
LoganJ., and SchneiderM.1981. “The Stratification of Metropolitan Suburbs, 1960–1970,” American Sociological Review46(2), 175–186.
27.
LucyW. H., and PhilipsD. L.2000. Confronting Suburban Decline: Strategic Planning for Metropolitan Renewal. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28.
LucyW. H., and PhilipsD. L.2006. Tomorrow's Cities, Tomorrow's Suburbs. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
29.
MaddenJ. F.2003. “The Changing Spatial Concentration of Income and Poverty among Suburbs of Large U.S. Metropolitan Areas,” Urban Studies40(3), 481–503.
McDonnellP.1995. “Economic Shocks South of the Border in Lennox; Jobs: Like other Immigrant Areas It Has Inexorable Ties to Mexico,” Los Angeles Times, A1, June 20.
MikelbankB. A.2004. “A Typology of U.S. Suburban Places,” Housing Policy Debate15(4), 935–964.
34.
NeidtC.2006. “Gentrification and Grassroots: Popular Support in the Revanchist Suburb,” Journal of Urban Affairs28(2), 99–120.
35.
NicolaidesB. M., and WieseA.2006. The Suburb Reader. New York: Routledge.
36.
O'ConnorC. A.1983. A Sort of Utopia: Scarsdale, 1891–1981. New York: State University of New York Press.
37.
OhlemacherS.2006. “Report: Suburbs Nearer to Cities Neglected,” The Washington Post, B1, February 15.
38.
OrfieldM.2002. American Metropolitics: the New Suburban Reality. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
39.
RobertsS.2007. “In Shift: 40% of Immigrants Move Directly to the Suburbs,” The New York Times, A22, October 17.
40.
RogersP.2006. “Intraurban Mobility, Immigration, and Urban Settlement Patterns: the Case of Texas Gateways,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
RuskD.2003. Cities Without Suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
43.
ShevkyE., and BellQ.1955. Social Area Analysis: Theory and Illustrative Application and Computational Procedure. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
SingerA., HardwickS. W., and BrettellC. B.2008. Twenty–First Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
45.
SmithN., CarisP., and WylyE.2001. “The “Camden Syndrome” and the Menace of Suburban Decline: Residential Disinvestment and its Discontents in Camden County, New Jersey,” Urban Affairs Review36(4), 497–531.
46.
TeafordJ.1993. The Twentieth–Century American City, 2nd edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
47.
TeafordJ.2007. The American Suburb: the Basics. New York: Routledge.
48.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2006. State of the Cities Data System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
49.
VicinoT.2008. “The Spatial Transformation of First–Tier Suburbs, 1970 to 2000. the Case of Metropolitan Baltimore,” Housing Policy Debate19(3), 479–518.
50.
VicinoT. J., HanlonB., and ShortJ. R.2007. “Megalopolis 50 Years on: the Transformation of a Globalizing City Region,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research31(2), 344–367.
51.
WalkerA. K.2008. “Point Has a New Owner: Sevverstal Deal Raises Hopes for Future of Md. Steal Complex,” The Baltimore Sun, D1, May 8.
52.
WilsonR. G.1979. “Idealism and the Origin of the First American Suburbs: Llewellyn Park, New Jersey,” American Art Journal11(4), 79–90.
53.
WylyE.1999. “Continuity and Change in the Restless Urban Landscape,” Economic Geography74(4), 309–38.
