This article analyzes whether neighborhood context or environment in Seattle influences dimensions of social ties among neighbors, independent of the individual attributes of residents such as home ownership and socio‐economic status. Three dimensions of neighbor ties are examined: interaction, organizing collectively, and knowing about neighbors. A number of environmental attributes are considered, including the age of the housing, residential stability, levels of affluence, the presence of blacks and foreign born, the concentration of commercial areas (heterogeneous land use), and the degree of upkeep in the area. While many are correlated with neighbor ties, few have a strong relationship with neighbor ties when individual attributes are controlled statistically. We find, in addition, that the importance of context varies with the type of neighbor tie. We discuss the implications of these findings for formulating a contextual theory of neighborhood life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellairP. E.1997. “Social Interaction and Community Crime, Examining the Importance of Neighbor Networks,” Criminology35,677–703.
2.
BretonR.1964. “Institutional Completeness of Ethnic Communities and the Personal Relations of Immigrants,” American Journal of Sociology70,193–205.
3.
BurgessE. W.1925. “ Can Neighborhood Work Have a Scientific Basis?” in R. E. Park , E. W. Burgess , and R. D. McKenzie (eds.), The City, pp.142–155. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
4.
CampbellK. E.LeeB. A.1992. “Sources of Personal Neighbor Networks, Social Integration, Need, or TimeSocial Forces70,1077–1100.
5.
FischerC. S.JacksonR. M.1976. “ Suburbs, Networks, and Attitudes?” in B. Schwartz (ed.), The Changing Face of the Suburbs, pp.279–307. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
6.
FischerC. S.JacksonR. M.1977. “ Suburbanism and Localism,” in C. S. Fischer , R. M. Jackson , C. A. Stueve , K. Gerson , L. C. McJones , with M. Baldassare (eds.), Networks and Places, Social Relations in the Urban Setting, pp.117–138. New York : Free Press.
7.
FreemanJ.CarrollG. R.HannanM. T.1983. “The Liability of Newness, Age Dependence in Organizational Death Rates,” American Sociological Review48,692–710.
8.
GansH. J.1962a. The Urban Villagers, Group and Class in the Life of Italian Americans. New York : The Free Press.
9.
GansH. J.1962b. “ Urbanism and Suburbanism as Ways of Life: A Reevaluation of Definitions,” in A. M. Rose (ed.), Human Behavior and Social Processes, pp.625–648. Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
10.
GansH. J.1963. “ Effects of the Move from City to Suburb,” in L. J. Duhl (ed.), The Urban Condition, pp.184–198. New York : Basic Books.
11.
GansH. J.1967. The Levittowners, Ways of Life and Politics in a New Suburban Community. New York : Vintage.
12.
GansH. J.1968. People and Plans: Essays on Urban Problems and Solutions. New York : Basic Books, Inc.
13.
GersonK.StueveC. A.FischerC. S.1977. “ Attachment To Place?” in C. S. Fischer , R. M. Jackson , C. A. Stueve , K. Gerson , L. C. McJones , with M. Baldassare (eds.), Networks and Places, Social Relations in the Urban Setting, pp.139–161. New York : Free Press.
14.
GordonM. M. ,1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York : Oxford University Press.
15.
GreerS.1962. The Emerging City, Myth and Reality. New York : Free Press.
16.
GreerS.1972. The Urbane View, Life and Politics in Metropolitan America. New York : Oxford University Press.
17.
GuestA. M.1984. “Robert Park and the Natural Area: A Sentimental ReviewSociology and Social Research69,1–21.
18.
GuestA. M.1999. “The Mediate Community: The Nature of Local and Extra‐Local Ties Within the MetropolisUrban Affairs Review36,603–627.
19.
GuestA. M.LeeB. A.1983a. “Consensus on Locality Names in the Metropolis,” Sociology and Social Research67,374–391.
20.
GuestA. M.LeeB. A.1983b. “The Social Organization of Local Areas,” Urban Affairs Quarterly19,217–240.
21.
GuestA. M.WierzbickiS. K.1999. “Social Ties at the Nighborhood Level: Two Decades of GSS Evidence,” Urban Affairs Review35,92–111.
22.
HuckfeldtR. R.1984. “Social Contexts, Social Networks, and Urban Environments: Environmental Constraints On Friendship Choice,” American Journal of Sociology89,651–669.
23.
KasardaJ. D.JanowitzM.1974. “Community Attachment in Mass Society,” American Sociological Review39,328–339.
24.
KubrinC.WeitzerR.2003. “New Directions in Social Disorganization Theory,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency40,374–402.
25.
LeeB. A.OropesaR. S.KananJ. W.1994. “Neighborhood Context and Residential Mobility,” Demography31,249–270.
26.
LeeB. A.OropesaR. S.MetchB. J.GuestA. M.1984. “Testing the Decline‐of‐Community Thesis: Neighborhood Organizations in Seattle, 1929 and 1979,” American Journal of Sociology89,1161–1188.
27.
LiebowE.1967. Tally's Corner: A Study of Negro Streetcorner Men. Boston : Little, Brown.
28.
MahlerS.1995. American Dreaming, Immigrant Life on the Margins. Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press.
29.
McCorquodaleD. W.PullumT. W.1974. “A Mathematical Model for Determining Effectiveness in Family Planning Clinics,” Studies in Family Planning5,232–238.
30.
McKenzieR. D.1925. “ The Ecological Approach to the Study of the Human Community,” in R. E. Park , E. W. Burgess , and R. D. McKenzie (eds.), The City, pp.63–79. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
31.
MichelsonW.1977. Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction. New York : Oxford University Press.
32.
MietheT. D.MeierR. F. .1994. Crime and Its Social Context: Toward an Integrated Theory Of Offenders, Victims, and Situations. Albany : State University New York Press.
33.
NoharaS.1968. “ Social Context and Neighborliness, the Negro in St. Louis,” in S. Greer , D. L. McElrath , D. W. Minar , and P. Orleans , The New Urbanization, pp.179–188. New York : St. Martin's Press.
34.
ParkR. E.1925. “ The City, Suggestions for the Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment,” in R. E. Park , E. W. Burgess , and R. D. McKenzie (eds.), The City, pp.1–45. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
35.
ParkR. E.1926. “ The Urban Community as a Spatial Pattern and a Moral Order,” in E. W. Burgess (ed.), The Urban Community, pp.3–18. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
36.
ParkR. E.1929. “ The City as a Social Laboratory,” in T. V. Smith , and L. D. White (eds.), An Experiment in Social Science Research, pp.1–19. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
37.
ParkR. E.1936. “Succession: An Ecological Concept,” American Sociological Review1,171–179.
38.
ParkR. E.1967. On Social Control and Collective Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
PortesA.BachR. L.1985. Latin Journey, Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States. Berkeley : University of California Press.
40.
RainwaterL.1970. Behind Ghetto Walls, Black Families in a Federal Slum. Chicago : Aldine.
41.
RankinB. H.QuaneJ. M.2000. “Neighborhood Poverty and the Social Isolation of Inner‐City African‐American Families,” Social Forces79,139–164.
42.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models, Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park , CA : SAGE Publications.
43.
RountreeP.LandK. C.MietheT. D.1994. “Micro‐Macro Integration in the Study of Victimization: A Hierarchical Logistic Regression Model Analysis across Seattle Neighborhoods,” Criminology32,387–414.
44.
RountreeP. W.WarnerB. D.1999. “Social Ties and Crime, Is the Relationship GenderedCriminology37,789–814.
45.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.EarlsF.1999. “Beyond Social Capital, Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children,” American Sociological Review64,633–660.
46.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon‐RowleyT.2002. “Assessing ‘Neighborhood Effects’: Social Processes And New Directions in Research,” Annual Review of Sociology28,443–478.
47.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF.1997. “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime,” Science277,918–24.
48.
ShawC. R.McKayH.1969[1942]. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
49.
WarnerB. D.RountreeP. W.1997. “Local Social Ties in a Community and Crime Model: Questioning the Systemic Nature of Informal Social Control. Social Problems44,520–536.
50.
WebberM. M.1963. “ Order in Diversity, Community without Propinquity,” in L. Wingo (ed.), Cities and Space: The Future Use of Urban Land, pp.23–54. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
51.
WellmanB.2001. “Physical Place and Cyber Place: The Rise of Networked Individualism,” International Journal Of Urban and Regional Research25,227–52.
52.
LeightonB. Wellman, B. , and.1979. “Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities,” Urban Affairs Quarterly14,363–90.
53.
WierzbickiS.2000. Immigrant Isolation,The Presence of Strong Ties Among Hispanics and Asians, Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Seattle : University of Washington.
54.
WilsonW. J.1987. The Truly Disadvantaged, The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
55.
WirthL.1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life,” American Journal of Sociology44,3–24.
56.
WooleverC.1992. “A Contextual Approach to Community Attachment,” Urban Studies29,99–116.
57.
ZelinskyW.LeeB. A.1998. “Heterolocalism: An Alternative Model of the Sociospatial Behaviour of Immigrant Ethnic Communities,” International Journal of Population Geography4,281–298.
58.
ZhouM.BankstonC. L.1998. Growing Up American: How Vietnamese Children Adapt to Life in the United States. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
