ArgyrisC.1993. Knowledge for Action. San Francisco : Jossey‐Bass.
2.
BaumgartnerF.JonesB.1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
3.
BriggsX. de S.1998. “Brown Kids in White Suburbs: Housing Mobility and the Many Faces of Social Capital,” Housing Policy Debate9(1),177–221.
4.
Briggs, X. de S. (ed.)2005. The Geography of Opportunity: Race and Housing Choice in Metropolitan America. Washington , DC : Brookings Institution Press.
5.
BriggsX. de S.TurnerM.A.2005. “Fairness in new New Orleans,” The Boston Globe, October 5.
6.
Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program.2005. “New Orleans After the Storm: Lessons from the Past, A Plan for the Future.” Washington , DC : Author, October.
7.
BrooksD.2005. “Katrina's Silver Lining,” The New York Times, September 8.
8.
FischerC. S.2003. “Ever‐More Rooted Americans,” City & Community1(2),175–193.
9.
KingdonJ.1984. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York : Harper‐Collins.
10.
KlinenbergE.2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
11.
LoganJ. R.2006. “The Impact of Katrina: Race and Class in Storm‐Damaged Neighborhoods,” Hurricane Katrina Project, Initiative on Spatial Structures in the Social Sciences, Brown University , Providence , RI , January.
12.
LoganJ. L.MolotchH. L.1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley , CA : University of California Press.
13.
MajoneG.1989. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven : Yale University Press.
14.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A.1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
15.
MooreM.1990. “ What Sort of Ideas Become Public Ideas?” in R. Reich (ed.), The Power of Public Ideas, pp.55–83. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
16.
National Low‐Income Housing Coalition.2004. “Out of Reach, 2004.” Washington , DC : Author.
17.
OrrL.FeinsJ. D.JacobR.BeecroftE.SanbonmatsuL.KatzL. F.LiebmanJ. R.KlingJ. R.2003. Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program: Interim Impacts Evaluation. Washington , DC : U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development .
18.
QuillianL.2003. “How Long Are Exposures to Poor Neighborhoods? The Long‐Term Dynamics of Entry and Exit from Poor Neighborhoods,” Population Research and Policy Review22,221–49.
19.
SampsonR.1999. “ What Community Supplies,” in R. Ferguson and W. Dickens (eds.), Urban Problems and Community Development, pp.241–292. Washington , DC : Brookings Institution Press.
20.
SampsonR.RaudenbushS. Earls, F. 1997. “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multi‐Level Study of Collective Efficacy,” Science277(5328),918–924.
21.
SchönD.ReinM.1994. Frame Reflection. New York : Basic.
22.
ScottJ.1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven : Yale University Press.
23.
SharkeyP.2006. “Were whites really more likely than blacks to die in Katrina?: A re‐analysis of data on race and the casualties of Katrina,” New Vision, Cambridge , Massachusetts . February [World Wide Web pagehttp://www.newvisioninstitute.org.
24.
StoneD.1988. Policy Paradox and Political Reason. New York : Harper‐Collins.
25.
ValeL. J.2005. “New Orleans will rise again,” The Boston Globe, September 25.
26.
Vale, L. J. , and Campanella, T. (eds.).2005. The Resilient City: How Modern Cities Recover from Disaster. New York : Oxford University Press.
27.
WalshJ.2005. “After The Deluge, What Next?” Editor's roundtable, Available at Salon.com, September 28.
28.
WeissC. H.BucuvalasM.1980. “Truth Tests and Utility Tests: Decision Makers' Frames of Reference for Social Science Research,” American Sociological Review45(2),302–313.
29.
WellmanB.1979. “The Community Question,” American Journal of Sociology84,1201–1231.
30.
WilenskyH.2005. “Can Social Science Shape the Public Agenda?Contexts4(2),41–47.