During the 1990s, universities and foundations separately entered into community partnerships with the intent of revitalizing poor urban neighborhoods. We describe the historical context that preceded their involvement in these partnerships, outline the evolution in ideas about “community empowerment” integral to such partnerships, and explain the partnership model's attractiveness. We then analyze how and why these partnerships embraced the rhetoric of community empowerment and discuss the paradox of elites attempting to empower poor people. Our analysis suggests that these partnerships allowed for the appearance of an inclusive solution to community problems, while maintaining the legitimacy and privilege of their elite sponsors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerG.1994. “Community Action and Maximum Feasible Participation: An Opportunity Lost But Not Forgotten for Expanding Democracy at Home,” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy8(2),547–571.
2.
AksartovaS.2003. “In Search of Legitimacy: Peace Grant Making of U.S. Philanthropic Foundations. 1988–1996,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly32(1),25–46.
3.
AlbertS.WhettenD. A.1985. “ Organizational Identity,”in B. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, pp.263–295. Greenwich , CT : JAI Press.
4.
AlexanderJ.1999. “The Impact of Devolution on Nonprofits: A Multiphase Study of Social Service Organizations,” Nonprofit Management and Leadership10(Fall),57–70.
5.
AlexanderV.1998. “ Environmental Constraints and Organizational Strategies: Complexity, Conflict, and Coping in the Nonprofit Sector,”in W. W. Powell and E. Clemens (eds.), Private Action and the Public Good. New Haven , CT : Yale University Press.
6.
AronowitzS.2000. The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning. Boston , MA : Beacon Press.
7.
Aspen Institute Roundtable.2001. Community Involvement in Partnerships with Educational Institutions, Medical Centers, and Utility Companies. Prepared for the Annie E. Casey Foundation, January.
8.
AtkinsonR.1999. “Discourse of Partnerships and Empowerment in Contemporary British Urban Regeneration,” Urban Studies36(1),59–72.
9.
BellahR. N.MadsenR.SullivanW.SwidlerA.TiptonS. M.1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley : University of California Press.
10.
BermanW. C.1994. America's Right Turn: From Nixon to Bush. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
BokD. C.2003. Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education. Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press.
12.
BombardieriM.RobinsonW. V.2004, “Wealthiest Nonprofits Favored by Foundations,” Boston Globe,January 11, 2004, p.1.
13.
BorisE. T.1999. “ The Nonprofit Sector in the 1990s,”in C. T. Clotfelter and T. Ehrlich (eds.), Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
14.
BoyerE. L.1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton , NJ : Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
15.
BoyerE. L.1994. “Creating the New American college,” Chronicle of Higher Education40(27)(March 9),A48(1).
16.
Bringle, R. G. , Games, R. , and Malloy, E. A. (eds.).1999. Colleges and Universities as Citizens. Needham Heights , MA : Allyn & Bacon.
17.
BrintS.2002. The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University. Stanford , CA : Stanford University Press.
18.
BrownE.1999. “ Patterns and Purposes of Philanthropic Giving,”in C. T. Clotfelter and T. Ehrlich (eds.), Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America, pp.212–230. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
19.
BrownP.ButlerB.HamiltonR.2001. The Sandtown‐Winchester Neighborhood Transformation Initiative: Lessons Learned about Community Building & Implementation. Baltimore : The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
20.
BrownP.GargS.1997. Foundations and Comprehensive Community Initiatives: The Challenges of Partnership. Chicago : Chapin Hall Center for Children, April.
21.
BurnsT.SpilkaG.1997. The Planning Phase of the Rebuilding Communities Initiative. Baltimore : The Annie E. Casey Foundation, July.
22.
CarrJ.2002. “ It's not just academic: University‐community partnerships are rebuilding neighborhoods,”in Housing Facts and Findings. Washington , DC : Office of University Partnerships:http://www.oup.org/news/08_2000_10.html.
23.
Chicago Initiative.1992. “ The Chicago Initiative Long Range Planning Task Force Report,” Chicago Historical Society Archives. Box: Marta White #1. Folder: Reports.
24.
CloudS.1991. “ The Changing Role of Government and its Impact on the Nonprofit and Business Sectors,”in J. P. Shannon (ed.), The Corporate Contributions Handbook. San Francisco : Jossey‐Bass.
25.
ColwellM. A.1993. Private Foundations and Public Policy: The Political Role of Philanthropy. New York : Garland Publishing.
26.
De ToquevilleA.1969. In J. P. Mayer (ed.), Democracy in America. Translated by George Lawrence. New York : Harper and Row.
27.
DewarM. E.IsaacC. B.1998. “Learning from Difference: The Potentially Transforming Experience of Community‐University Collaboration,” Journal of Planning Education and Research17,334–347.
28.
EdwardsJ.1997. “Urban Policy: The Victory of Form over Substance,” Urban Studies34,825–843.
29.
EdelmanI.2000. “Evaluation and Community‐Based Initiatives,” Social Policy31(2),13–21.
30.
FermanB.HillT. L.2004. “The Challenges of Agenda Conflict in Higher‐Education Community Research Partnerships: Views from the Community Side,” Journal of Urban Affairs26(2),241–257.
31.
FishmanN.PhillipsM.1993. A Review of Comprehensive, Collaborative Persistent Poverty Initiatives. Evanston , IL : Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, June.
32.
GlassickC. E.1999. “ Ernest L. Boyer: Colleges and Universities as Citizens,”in R. Bringle , R. Games , and E. Malloy (eds.), Colleges and Universities as Citizens. Needham Heights , MA : Allyn & Bacon.
33.
GroganP. S.ProscioT.2000. Comeback Cities: A Blueprint for Urban Neighborhood Revival. Boulder , CO : Westview Press.
34.
HalpernR.1995. Rebuilding the Inner City. New York : Columbia University Press.
35.
HarkavyI.1999. “School‐Community–University Partnerships: Effectively Integrating Community Building and Education Reform,” Universities and Community Schools6(1–2),7–24.
36.
HebsonG.GrimshawD.MarchingtonM.2003. “PPPs and the Changing Public Sector Ethos,” Work, Employment & Society17(3),481–501.
37.
HimmelsteinJ. L.1990. To the Right: The Transformation of American Conservatism. Berkeley : University of California Press.
38.
JonesP. S.2003. “Urban Regeneration's Poisoned Chalice: Is There an Impasse in (Community) Participation‐Based Policy?Urban Studies40(3),581–602.
39.
KarlB. D.KarlA. W.1999. “ Foundations and the Government: A Tale of Conflict and Consensus,”in C. T. Clotfelter and T. Ehrlich (eds.), Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America, pp.122–138. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
40.
KarlB. D.KatzS. N.1981. “The American Private Foundation and the Public Sphere 1890–1930,” Minerva19,236–270.
41.
KatzM. B.1986. In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America. New York : Basic Books.
42.
KatzM. B.1989. The Undeserving Poor: From the Poor on Poverty to the War on Welfare. New York : Pantheon Books.
43.
KlinenbergE.2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
44.
LeGatesR. T.RobinsonG.1998. “Institutionalizing University Community Partnerships,” Journal of Planning Education and Research17,312–322.
45.
LemannN.1981. The Promised Land. New York : Alfred A. Knopf.
46.
LenkowskyL.1999. “ Reinventing Philanthropy,”in C. T. Clotfelter and T. Ehrlich (eds.), Philanthropy and The Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America, pp.34–51. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
47.
LinderS. H.1999. “Coming to Terms with the Public‐Private Partnerships: A Grammar of Multiple Meanings,” American Behavioral Scientist43(1),35–51.
48.
LinderS. H.RosenauP. V.2000. “ Mapping the Terrain of the Public‐Private Policy Partnership,”in P. V. Rosenau (ed.), Public‐Private Partnerships. Cambridge : MIT Press.
49.
MaurrasseD. J.2001. Beyond the Campus: How Colleges and Universities Form Partnerships with Their Communities. New York : Routledge.
50.
NielsenW. A.1985. The Golden Donors: A New Anatomy of the Great Foundations. New York : E.P. Dutton.
51.
O'ConnorA.1999. “ The Ford Foundation and Philanthropic Activism in the 1960s,”in E. C. Lagemann (ed.), Philanthropic Foundations: New Scholarship, New Possibilities, pp.169–194. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
52.
OdendahlT.1987. “ Foundations and the Nonprofit Sector,”in T. Odendahl (ed.), America's Wealthy and the Future of Foundations, pp.27–42. New York : The Foundation Center.
53.
OsborneD.GaeblerT.1993. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. NY : Penguin.
54.
OstranderS. A.1989. “ The Problem of Poverty and Why Philanthropy Neglects It,”in V. A. Hodgkinson , R. W. Lyman , and Associates (eds.), The Future of the Nonprofit Sector: Challenges, Changes, and Policy Considerations, pp.219–236. San Francisco : Jossey‐Bass.
55.
OstranderS.2004. “Democracy, Civic Participation, and the University: A Comparative Study of Civic Engagement on Five Campuses,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33(1),74–93.
56.
PattersonJ. T.2000. America's Struggle Against Poverty in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press.
57.
PressE.WashburnJ.2000. “The Kept University,” The Atlantic MonthlyMarch,39–54.
58.
PutnamR. D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York : Simon & Schuster.
59.
RosenauP. V.2000. “ The Strengths and Weaknesses of Public‐Private Partnerships,”Chapter 13 in S. P. Osborne (ed.), Public‐Private Partnerships: Theory and Practice in International Perspective. New York : Routledge.
60.
RosenzweigR. M.1998. The Political University: Policy Politics, and Presidential Leadership in the American Research University. Baltimore , MD : The Johns Hopkins University Press.
61.
RubinV.2000. “Evaluating University‐Community Partnerships: An Examination of the Evolution of Questions and Approaches,” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research5(1),219–230.
62.
SchramS. E.1995. Words of Welfare: The Poverty of Social Science and the Social Science of Poverty. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
63.
SchramS. E.2000. After Welfare: The Culture of Postindustrial Social Policy. New York : New York University Press.
64.
SelznickP. P.1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Evanston , IL : Row, Peterson, & Co.
65.
ShirlowP.MurtaghB.2004. “Capacity‐Building, Representation, and Intracommunity Conflict,” Urban Studies41(1),57–70.
66.
SilkaL.1999. “Paradoxes of Partnerships: Reflections on University‐Community Collaborations,” Research in Politics and Society7,335–359.
67.
SilverI.2004. “Negotiating the Antipoverty Agenda: Foundations, Community Organizations, and Comprehensive Community Initiatives,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly33(4) December,606–627.
68.
SlaughterS.LeslieL. L.1999. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
SmithJ. A.1999. “ The Evolving American Foundation,”in C. T. Clotfelter and T. Ehrlich (eds.), Philanthropy and the Nonprofit Sector in a Changing America, pp.34–51. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
70.
SmithS. R.2001. “Nonprofit Organizations in Urban Politics and Policy,” Policy Studies Review18(4),7–27.
71.
StoeckerR.1997. “The Community Development Corporation Model of Urban Redevelopment: A Critique and an Alternative,” Journal of Urban Affairs19,1–23.
72.
SuchmanM. C.1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review20(3),571–610.
73.
TaylorM.2001. “ Partnerships: Insiders and Outsiders,”in M. Harris and C. Rochester (eds.), Voluntary Organisations and Social Policy in Britain, pp.94–107. New York : Palgrave.
74.
TrattnerW. I.1984. From Poor Law to Welfare State: A History of Social Welfare in America,3rd edition. New York : The Free Press.
75.
Urban Institute.2002. Lessons from the Community Outreach Partnership Center Program. Washington , DC : U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
76.
Voices from the Field II: Learning from the Early Work of Comprehensive Community Initiatives.2002. Washington , DC : The Aspen Institute.
77.
WaddanA.1997. The Politics of Social Welfare. Brookfield , VT : Edward Elgar.
78.
WalshJ.1997. “Community Building in Theory and Practice: Three Case Studies,” National Civic Review86(Winter),291–314.
79.
WalshJ.1999. The Eye of the Storm: Ten Years on the Front Lines of New Futures. Baltimore : The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
80.
WeaverR. K.2000. Ending Welfare as We Know It. Washington , DC : Brookings Institution Press.
81.
WiewelW.LieberM.1998. “Goal Achievement, Relationship Building, and Incrementalism: The Challenges of University‐Community Partnerships,” Journal of Planning Education and Research17,291–301.
82.
WinkelmanL.1997. “Massachusetts Community Development Corporations and Community Organizing,” Massachusetts Association of CDCs , December.
83.
WolpertJ.1997. “ How Federal Cutbacks Affect the Charitable Sector,”in L. A. Staeheli , J. E. Kodras , and C. Flint (eds.), State Devolution in America. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
84.
ZarefskyD.1986. President Johnson's War on Poverty: Rhetoric and History. Birmingham : University of Alabama Press.
85.
ZemskyR.2003. “Have We Lost the ‘Public’ in Higher Education?The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 30,B7–B9.
