Evidence–Based Accommodation Decision Making at the Postsecondary Level: Review of the Evidence for Foreign Language Learning

Abstract

This article reviews empirical evidence related to college students classified as learning disabled (LD) and foreign language (FL) learning by examining whether there are differences between: (a) students classified and not classified as LD enrolled in FL courses; (b) LD students with and without IQ–achievement discrepancies and FL aptitude, proficiency, and achievement; and (c) students classified as LD who pass FL courses or receive course substitutions. Findings show that there are no cognitive and achievement differences between students classified as LD and non–LD students enrolled in FL courses or between students classified as LD who pass FL courses or receive course substitutions. Findings have shown that there are no differences in FL outcomes between students classified as LD with and without discrepancies. Research findings over several years show that classification as LD is unimportant for determining whether or not a student will exhibit FL learning problems or fail FL courses.

Editor's comments: In 2007 (Volume 22, Issue 4), LDRP published a special issue entitled “Accommodating Students with Learning Disabilities in Postsecondary Settings: Issues and Practices.” In the following article, Dr. Richard Sparks elaborates and extends the findings in Dr. Nicole Ofeish's article, “Math, Science, and Foreign Language: Evidence–Based Accommodation Decision making at the Postsecondary Level,” as they relate to providing the accommodation of waiving foreign language courses.