Although the Portuguese educational system advocates the accommodation of all students in regular schools, it has not adopted a coherent discourse that would contribute to meeting effectively the needs of students with specific learning disabilities (SLD). As such, the successive reorganizations of special education have resulted in uninformed decisions that have caused the education of students with SLD in Portugal to be, in many instances, detrimental to their academic and social growth. We describe the reality of SLD in Portugal, considering four main topics: (1) the establishment of the SLD concept, (2) the birth of a Portuguese definition of SLD, (3) the context of educational policy, and (4) the provision for students with SLD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BairrãoJ., FelgueirasI., FontesP., PereiraF., & VilhenaC. (1998). Os alunos com necessidades educativas especiais: Subsídios para o sistema de educação. Lisboa, Portugal : Conselho Nacional de Educação/Ministério da Educação.
2.
CohenS. A. (1971). Dyspedagogia as a cause of reading retardation: Definition and treatment. In BatemanB. (Ed.), Learning disorders: Reading (pp. 269–291). Seattle, WA : Special Child Publications.
3.
CorreiaL. M. (1991). Dificuldades de aprendizagem: Contributos para a clarificação e unificação de conceitos. Porto, Portugal : Associação dos Psicólogos Portugueses.
4.
CorreiaL. M. (1997). Alunos com necessidades educativas especiais nas classes regulares. Porto, Portugal : Porto Editora.
5.
CorreiaL. M. (1999). O papel da escola na transição para a vida activa de alunos com necessidades educativas especiais. Sonhar, 3, 201–209.
6.
CorreiaL. M. (2001). Educação inclusiva ou educação apropriada? In RodriguesD. (Ed.), Educação e diferença (pp. 121–142). Porto, Portugal : Porto Editora.
7.
CorreiaL. M. (2003). Inclusão e necessidades educativas especiais. Porto, Portugal : Porto Editora.
8.
CorreiaL. M. (2004). Problematização das dificuldades de aprendizagem nas necessidades educativas especiais. Análise Psicológica, XXII(2), 369–376.
9.
CorreiaL. M. (2005a). Dificuldades de aprendizagem: Factos e estatísticas. Retrieved Dec. 19, 2005 from http://www.portoeditora.pt.
10.
CorreiaL. M. (2005b). Educação especial e necessidades educativas especiais: Ao encontro de uma plataforma comum. Relatório apresentado ao secretário de Estado da Educação. Lisboa, Portugal : Ministério da Educação.
11.
CorreiaL. M. (2006a, May). O Estado da arte da educação especial em Portugal: O Caso dos alunos com dificuldades de aprendizagem. Paper presented at the LD meeting, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
FiedorowicsC., BenezraE., MacDonaldW., McElgunnB., WilsonA., & KaplanB. (2001). Neurological basis of learning disabilities: An update. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 61–74.
17.
FletcherJ. M., MorrisR. D., & LyonG. R. (2003). Classification and definition of learning disabilities: An integrative perspective. In SwansonH. L., HarrisK. R., & GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 30–56). New York : Guilford.
18.
FonsecaV. (1984). Introdução às dificuldades de aprendizagem. Lisboa, Portugal : Editorial Notícias.
19.
FonsecaV. (1999). Insucesso escolar: Abordagem psicopedagógica às dificuldades de aprendizagem. Lisboa, Portugal : Âncora Editora.
20.
FonsecaV. (2001). Cognição e aprendizagem. Lisboa, Portugal : Âncora Editora.
21.
FuchsD., MockD., MorganP., & YoungC. (2003). Responsiveness–to–intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 18(3), 157–171.
22.
GreshamF. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In BradlyR., DanielsonL., & HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467–519). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
23.
HallahanD. P., LloydJ. W., KauffmanJ. M., WeissM. P., & MartinezE. A. (2005). Learning disabilities: Foundations, characteristics, and effective teaching (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA : Allyn & Bacon.
24.
HallahanD. P., & MercerC. D. (2002). Learning disabilities: Historical perspectives. In BradlyR., DanielsonL., & HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467–519). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
25.
HammillD. D. (1990). On defining learning disabilities: An emerging consensus. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 74–84.
26.
HammillD. D. (1993). A brief look at the learning disabilities movement in the United States. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 295–310.
27.
HammillD. D., LeighJ. E., McNuttG., & LarsenS. C. (1981). A new definition of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 336–342.
28.
HewardW. L. (2006). Porque razão é a educação especial importante. Educare Hoje, special edition, 10–11.
29.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1990). Public Law 101–476, Section 602(a)(19). Washington, DC : U.S. Office of Education.
30.
KauffmanJ. M. (2002). Education deform: Bright people sometimes say stupid things about education. Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Education.
31.
KavaleK. A., & FornessS. R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability do and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239–256.
32.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1994). Collective perspectives on issues affecting learning disabilities: Position papers and statements. Austin, TX : PRO–ED.
33.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. Retrieved Dec. 19, 2005 from http://www.njcld.org
34.
National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. (2004). Understanding responsiveness to intervention in learning disabilities determination. Retrieved Dec. 19, 2005 from http://www.nrlcd.org
35.
Public Law 94–142. (1975). Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 94th Congress, First Session.
36.
RebeloA. J. S. (1993). Dificuldades da leitura e da escrita em alunos do ensino básico. Rio Tinto, Portugal : Edições Asa.
37.
ShaywitzS. (2005). Overcoming dyslexia: A New and complete science–based program for overcoming reading problems. London : Vintage Publishers.
38.
SmithT. E. C., DowdyC. A., PollowayE. A., & BlalockG. E. (1997). Children and adults with learning disabilities. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
39.
VaughnS. (2003, December). How many tiers are needed for response to intervention to achieve acceptable prevention outcomes? Paper presented at the NRCLD Symposium, Responsiveness to intervention, Kansas City, MO. Retrieved Jan. 12, 2005 from http://www.nrcld.org
40.
WestL. L., CorbeyS., Boyer–StephensA., JonesB., MillerR. J., & Sarkees–WircenskiM. (1999). Integrating transition planning into the IEP process. Reston, VA : The Council for Exceptional Children.
