This article briefly outlines key issues related to the neurological substrate of basic language and reading functions in native speakers of Indo–European and Oriental Languages, and in individuals who are competent in more than one language. Modern neuroimaging techniques have been used in order to address conflicting results produced by older, less flexible methods. When issues of validity and reliability of brain activation protocols are systematically addressed, converging results across methods can be obtained. Only then can neuroimaging findings provide useful data and inform education policy regarding formal language learning and reading instruction and remediation. These are steps that can ensure that we can bring the technology and approaches to bear on the problems of learning disabilities in a focused and productive way.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbutalebiJ., CappaS. F., & PeraniD. (2001). The bilingual brain as revealed by functional neuroimaging. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 179–190.
2.
BillingsleyR. L., SimosP. G., PataraiaE., ZhangW., SarkariS., CastilloE. M., . (2004). Language Representation in Chinese and English Speakers: Magnetic Source Imaging of Verbal Fluency. Under peer review.
3.
BoatmanD. (2004). Cortical bases of speech perception: Evidence from functional lesion studies. Cognition, 92, 47–65.
4.
BongaertsT. (1999). Ultimate attainment in foreign language pronunciation: The case of very advanced late foreign language learners. In BirdsongD. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–159). Malwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
5.
CheeM. W. L., CaplanD., SoonC. S., SriramN., TanE. W. L., ThielT., . (1999). Processing of visually presented sentences in Mandarin and English studied with fMRI. Neuron, 23, 127–137.
6.
CheeM. W. L., TanE. W. L., & ThielT. (1999). Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 3050–3056.
7.
CheeM. W. L., WeekesB., LeeK. M., SoonC. S., SchreiberA., HoonJ. J., . (2000). Overlap and dissociation of semantic processing of Chinese characters, English words, and pictures: Evidence from fMRI. NeuroImage, 12, 392–403.
8.
DehaeneS. D., DupouxE., MehlerJ., CohenL., PaulesuE., PeraniD., . (1997). Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second languages. Neuroreport, 8, 3809–3815.
9.
FledgeJ. E., Yeni–KomshianG. H., & LiuS. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.
10.
FreudS. (1891). Zur auffassung der aphasien. Eine kritische studie. Leipzig und Wien, Germany : Franz Deutiche.
11.
HernandezA. E., MartinezA., & KohnertK. (2000). In search of the language switch: An fMRI study of picture naming in Spanish–English bilinguals. Brain and Language, 73, 421–431.
12.
IllesJ., FrancisW. S., DesmondJ. E., GabrieliJ. D. E., GloverG. H., PoldrackR., . (1999). Convergent cortical representation of semantic processing in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 70, 347–363.
13.
JohnsrudeI. S., PenhuneV. B., & ZatorreR. J. (2000). Functional specificity on the right human auditory cortex for perceiving pitch direction. Brain, 123, 155–163.
14.
KimH., & NaD. L. (2000). Dissociation of pure Korean words and Chinese–derivative words in phonological dysgraphia. Brain and Language, 74, 134–137.
15.
KimK. H. S., RelkinN. R., LeeK., & HirschJ. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388, 171–174.
16.
KleinD., MilnerB., ZatorreR. J., MeyerE., & EvansA. C. (1995). The neural substrates underlying word generation: A bilingual functional imaging study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 2899–2903.
17.
KleinD., MilnerB., ZatorreR. J., ZhaoV., & NikelskiJ. (1999). Cerebral organization in bilinguals: A PET study of Chinese–English verb generation. NeuroReport, 10, 2841–2846.
18.
KleinD., ZatorreR. J., MilnerB., & ZhaoV. (2001). A cross–linguistic PET study of tone perception in Mandarin Chinese and English speakers. NeuroImage, 13, 646–653.
19.
KleinD., ZatorreR. J., MilnerB., MeyerE., & EvansA. C. (1994). Left putaminal activation when speaking a second language: Evidence from PET. Neuroreport, 5, 2295–2297.
20.
LiuY., PerfettiC. A., & HartL. (2003). ERP evidence for the time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic information in Chinese meaning and pronunciation decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1231–1247.
21.
MinkowskiM. (1927, 1983). A clinical contribution to the study of polyglot aphasia especially with respect to Swiss–German. In ParadisM. (Ed.), Reading on aphasia in bilinguals and polyglots (pp. 205–232). Montreal, Canada : Didier.
22.
OjemannG. A. (1983). Brain organization for language from the perspective of electrical stimulation mapping. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 189–203.
23.
OjemannG. A., & WhitakerH. A. (1978). The bilingual brain. Archives of Neurology, 35, 409–412.
24.
OjemannG., OjemannJ., LettichE., & BergerM. (1989). Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients. Journal of Neurosurgery, 71, 316–326.
25.
ParadisM., & GoldblumM. (1989). Selective crossed aphasia in a trilingual aphasic patient followed by reciprocal antagonism. Brain and Language, 36, 62–75.
26.
PaulesuE., McCroryE., FazioF., MenoncelloL., BrunswickN., CappaS. F., . (2000). A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 91–96.
27.
PeraniD., DehaeneS., GrassiF., CohenL., CappaS. F., DupouxE., . (1996). Brain processing of native and foreign languages. Neuroreport, 7, 2439–2444.
28.
PeraniD., PaulesuE., GallesN. S., DupouxE., DehaeneS., BettinardiV., . (1998). The bilingual brain: Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain, 121, 1841–1852.
29.
PerfettiC., & ZhangS. (1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 174, 633–643.
30.
PitresA. (1895). Etude de l'aphase chez les polyglottes. Revue de Medecine, 15, 873–899.
31.
RapportR. L., TanC. T., & WhitakerH. A. (1983). Language function and dysfunction among Chinese– and English–speaking polyglots: Cortical stimulation, Wada testing, and clinical studies. Brain and Language, 18, 342–366.
32.
ScottS. K. (in press). The Neurobiology of Speech Perception. In CutlerA. (Ed.), Twenty–First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
33.
SimosP. G., BreierJ. I., FletcherJ. M., FoormanB. R., CastilloE. M., . (2002). Brain mechanisms for reading words and pseudowords: An integrated approach. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 297–305.
34.
SimosP. G., BreierJ. I., WhelessJ. W., MaggioW. W., FletcherJ. M., CastilloE. M., . (2000). Brain mechanisms for reading: The role of the superior temporal gyrus in word and pseudoword naming. NeuroReport, 3, 2443–2447.
35.
SimosP. G., CastilloE. M., FletcherJ. M., FrancisD. J., MaestuF., BreierJ. I., . (2001). Mapping of receptive language cortex in bilingual volunteers by using magnetic source imaging. Journal of Neurosurgery, 95, 76–81.
36.
SimosP. G., PapanicolaouA. C., BreierJ. I., WilmoreL. J., WhelessJ. W., ConstantinouJ. C., . (1999). Localization of language–specific cortex using MEG and intraoperative stimulation mapping. Journal of Neurosurgery, 91, 787–796.
37.
SoderfeldtB., IngvarM., RonnbergJ., ErikssonL., SerranderM., & Stone–ElanderS. (1997). Signed and spoken language perception studied by positron emission tomography. Neurology, 49, 82–87.
38.
SoderfeldtB., RonnbergJ., & RisbergJ. (1994). Regional cerebral blood flow in sign language users. Brain and Language, 46, 59–68.
39.
SugishitaM., OtomoK., KabeS., & YunokiK. (1992). A critical appraisal of neuropsychological correlates of Japanese ideogram (kanji) and phonogram (kana) reading. Brain, 115, 1563–1585.
40.
SugishitaM., TakayamaY., ShionoT., YoshikawaK., & TakahashiY. (1996). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during mental writing with phonograms. Neuroreport, 7, 1917–1921.
41.
TanL. H., LiuH. L., PerfettiC. A., SpinksJ. A., FoxP. T., & GaoJ. H. (2001). The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. Neuroimage, 13, 836–846.
42.
TokunagaH., NishikawaT., IkejiriY., NakagawaY., YasunoF., HashikawaK., . (1999). Different neural substrates for Kanji and Kana writing: A PET study. Neuroreport, 10, 3315–3319.
43.
ValakiC. E., MaestuF., SimosP. G., ZhangW., FernandezA., AmoC. M., . (2004). Neuropsychologia, 42, 967–979.
44.
WangM., PerfettiC. A., & LiuY. (2003). Alphabetic readers quickly acquire orthographic structure in learning to read chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 183–208.
45.
WeekesB. (2000). Oral reading in Chinese: Evidence from dementia of the Alzheimer's type. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 543–559.
46.
YetkinO., Zerrin YetkinF., HaughtonV. M., & CoxR. W. (1996). Use of functional MR to map language in multilingual volunteers. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 17, 473–477.
47.
ZatorreR. J., EvansA. C., MeyerE., & GjeddeA. (1992). Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. Science, 256, 846–849.
