Abstract
Neurology 2002;59:79–83
Somerville ER
Objectives
To assess clinical trials for evidence that antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) aggravate partial seizures. To determine if the method used to examine drug efficacy can also be used to examine seizure aggravation.
Background
It is widely accepted that AEDs aggravate epilepsy in some patients. However, there is little published objective or quantitative evidence. Most reports concern generalized epilepsies.
Methods
Pharmaceutical companies responsible for the development of five of the new AEDs were asked to provide data concerning seizure increases during randomized placebo-controlled, add-on clinical trials in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. Seizure frequency in individual patients taking drug or placebo was compared with the baseline pretreatment seizure frequency. The counterpart of the 50% reduction used in efficacy analyses is a 100% increase, because both represent a twofold change. A dose–response relation also was explored.
Results
More than 40% of subjects in clinical trials of tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), and levetiracetam (LEV) experienced an increase in seizures while taking a placebo. Seizure increases were no more likely to occur when taking any of the three drugs than when taking placebo. A doubling or more of seizure frequency was less likely to occur with TPM or LEV than with placebo but more likely with TGB. However, for TGB, this did not reach significance. There was some evidence for a dose–response effect with TGB but a negative effect with TPM (aggravation less likely with increasing dose). Data on gabapentin and lamotrigine were not provided.
Conclusions
Many patients with partial seizures have an increase in seizures when a new AED is added to their therapy. However, it occurs no more frequently when taking drug than placebo. It probably represents the spontaneous fluctuation of seizure frequency. When a patient who has started a new AED deteriorates, this is not necessarily a drug effect.
Commentary
An important part of the analysis was inclusion of patients who had worsening of seizures that caused them to leave the trial. Obviously, if the analysis had not included these dropouts, it would have potentially biased the study. Inclusion was accomplished by extrapolating seizures that had occurred before dropout into a weekly or monthly seizure rate. Unfortunately, seizure worsening, as demonstrated by change in seizure type or increase in individual seizure severity, was not measured. Another limitation of the study is that it includes only patients with partial seizures. Many reports of seizure worsening involve generalized seizure types such as absence and myoclonus (4–6).
The results indicate that seizure aggravation was less common for most drugs at most doses than it was in patients who underwent no change in their therapy (the placebo group). This may come as a surprise to clinicians who have been convinced that patients have worsened as a result of addition of one of the drugs that was examined. Certainly this study cannot rule out rare cases of individual worsening. It does, however, highlight the fact that such worsening is common among patients with uncontrolled refractory seizures; therefore it is often prudent to allow time for observation before deciding to abandon a recently initiated AED.
We are in the fortunate position of having placebo-controlled data in the partial seizure population to assess the impact of new AEDs. In the generalized epilepsy populations, we are often not so fortunate. The results from this study remind us that findings of worsening in open trials should be interpreted with caution.
