Abstract
Commentary
T-type Ca2+ channels have long been implicated in epilepsy. Their biophysical characteristics of low activation voltage, rapid kinetics, and voltage-dependent inactivation yield transient depolarizing currents that predispose neurons to burst firing. Their enriched distribution in the dendrites of pyramidal neurons places them in the company of other intrinsic conductances, such as A-type K+ channels and hyperpolarization-activated cation channels, which also are dynamically regulated in epilepsy (2,3). Previous work has shown up-regulation of T-channels in CA1 pyramidal neurons occurs in chronic epilepsy (4), T-channels mediate thalamocortical bursting phenomena underlying generalized seizures (5), and inhibition of these channels by ethosuximide likely mediates the drug's antiepileptic effect in absence epilepsy (6).
The present study by Becker and colleagues analyzes in great detail the regulation of T-channels in CA1 pyramidal neurons following an episode of pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus (the sheer scope of the methodology of this study, filling two and a half published pages of Methods, alone is impressive). The authors begin by demonstrating that a single subtype of T-channel, Cav3.2, underwent transient transcriptional up-regulation, beginning within 2 days after induced status epilepticus and terminating by day 10. By day 5 post–status epilepticus, protein expression of Cav3.2 increased five-fold; this effect too returned to normal levels a month later. Bursting behavior of CA1 neurons followed Cav3.2 levels, with a transient increase in the proportion of cells able to produce action potential bursts that returned to normal levels 20 days after status epilepticus. Importantly, mice with genetic deletions of the Cav3.2 subunit did not show the up-regulation of bursting behavior, proving its dependence on this subtype of T-channels. Interestingly, Cav3.2-/- mice still evidence T-type currents, suggesting that other Cav subunits may contribute to T-currents as well.
These data demonstrated a transient up-regulation of Ca2+ channel expression following status epilepticus. What role does Cav3.2 channel up-regulation play in epileptogenesis? The answer is surprising. Cav3.2 knockout mice develop epilepsy at a similar rate as wild-type mice, but seizure severity is markedly reduced. Other sequelae of status epilepticus, such as neuronal loss and mossy fiber sprouting, were also markedly attenuated by Cav3.2 deletion. The authors interpreted the findings as showing that the transient up-regulation of Cav3.2 channels after status epilepticus sets into motion unknown events that result, at later time points, in neurodegenerative changes and an increase in severity of the epilepsy phenotype. The objection could be raised that the knockout animals may have experienced a reduced intensity of provoked status epilepticus, which would in turn, have led to a milder epileptic condition. However, the authors quantified the status epilepticus duration and EEG spectrum intensity to show this was not the case.
In several ways, these findings challenge current conceptions of ion channelopathy in acquired epilepsy. The notion that ion-channel expression may transiently change, yet produce long-lasting epilepsy results, is contrary to the assumption that ion channelopathy occurs early and is persistent. Also, the specificity of these findings to a single ion channel subtype, while other subtypes mediating similar currents remain unchanged, is puzzling. So, does Cav3.2 mediate epileptogenesis? In the strict sense of the term, the answer is unclear. Cav3.2 knockouts ultimately develop epilepsy, just as wild types do, and with a similar time course. Thus, it does not appear that Cav3.2 deletion inhibits or delays the development of epilepsy. Because Cav3.2 channels are constitutively deleted in the knockouts, we cannot exclude the confounding possibility that these channels are exerting an antiepileptic—not antiepileptogenic— effect on seizure frequency and other neurodegenerative markers of epilepsy. Of note, the T-channel blocker ethosuximide does not produce significant antiepileptic actions in human acquired epilepsy syndromes, which may argue against this theory.
The authors acknowledge that development of a conditional knockout for Cav3.2 channels could address these issues by allowing transient suppression of Cav3.2 expression to occur only during the key post–status epilepticus period, while maintaining normal levels during epilepsy induction and chronic epilepsy. Such a difficult experiment would add important additional proof that Cav3.2 channels mediate epileptogenic neuronal plasticity, without producing antiepileptic actions as well.
Despite these limitations, the present study is one of the most complete descriptions of an acquired channelopathy in an animal model of epilepsy, tracing the development of Cav3.2 up-regulation from gene to protein to neuron to behavior. The thoroughness of the work by Becker et al. sets a new standard for studies of channelopathy and acquired epilepsy. Given the variety of ion channel alterations that already have been described, it is unrealistic to think that acquired epileptogenesis will depend on a single channel subtype, as it does in some human genetic syndromes. However, this study demonstrates that alteration of one ion channel species can have dramatic effects on the expression of chronic epilepsy. Further work to understand what early events link neural insults with subsequent derangement of channel expression and function may uncover common mechanisms of epileptogenesis that could be used to therapeutically target true preventative measures against epilepsy.
