Abstract
Commentary
One interesting hypothesis, based on the findings by Cohen et al., maintains that seizures in TLE result from excitatory GABAergic signaling that is due to perturbed neuronal chloride transport (1). In temporal lobe slices resected from medically intractable TLE patients with MTS, Cohen and colleagues demonstrated the presence of spontaneous interictal depolarizations originating in GABAergic pyramidal neurons in the subiculum and its transitional area with CA1. GABA, normally an inhibitory transmitter in most regions of the adult brain (including the subiculum), paradoxically triggered excitatory impulses in subicular pyramidal neurons in TLE patients. The authors suggested these depolarizing impulses serve as the nidus of spontaneous interictal discharges that spread to adjacent regions of the temporal lobe during seizures. The mechanism behind the “switch” that makes GABA excitatory rather than inhibitory in these neurons, until recently, had been a matter of conjecture. However, it had been known that an excitatory-to-inhibitory switch in GABA signaling, as occurs shortly after birth in the rodent and human cortex, is achieved in immature neurons via upregulation of the K+-Cl- cotransporter, KCC2 (2).
The direction and magnitude of GABA-induced chloride flux through GABAA receptor-associated chloride channels is determined by the intracellular Cl- concentration ([Cl-]i), which, in turn, is established via the coordinated activities of the Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter NKCC1 and of KCC2 (3). NKCC1 and KCC2 are related SLC12A family cation chloride cotransporters (CCCs) that are the primary mediators of neuronal chloride influx and efflux, respectively (3). These electroneutral cotransporters utilize the electrochemically favorable cellular sodium or potassium gradients established via the Na+-K+ ATPase to drive the influx or efflux of chloride via secondary active transport. In principal, the GABA hyperpolarizing-to-depolarizing shift occurring with TLE could result from any process that increases neuronal [Cl-]i by augmenting the relative activity of NKCC1 to KCC2 such that the opening of chloride-permeable GABAA channels produces passive outflow of negatively charged chloride ions, thereby depolarizing the neuron's membrane and upon reaching threshold, triggering action potentials. The contribution of altered NKCC1 and KCC2 activity to epileptogenesis has been documented in several model systems: 1) high expression of NKCC1 in the developing brain contributes to the pathogenesis of neonatal seizures (4,5); 2) KCC2 knockout mice exhibit hippocampal hyperexcitability and generalized seizures, dying shortly after birth (6,7); and 3) pharmacological inhibition of CCCs block epileptiform activity in vitro and in vivo (4,5,8).
Two recent reports provide insight into the mechanism underlying the paradoxical excitatory action of GABA in TLE. Munoz et al., using double-labeling immunofluorescence with antibodies specific for NKCC1 and KCC2, demonstrated a greater than 95% colocalization of NKCC1 and KCC2 in neurons in the subiculum (i.e., subiculum CA1, CA1, and CA4 areas in hippocampal tissue) of healthy individuals. In contrast, while a similar high percentage of neurons coexpressed NKCC1 and KCC2 in the nonsclerotic CA1 and CA4 areas of tissue from patients with TLE associated with hippocampal MTS, greater than 20% of NKCC1-expressing pyramidal neurons in the sclerotic subicular/CA1 transitional zone not only lacked KCC2 but exhibited increased NKCC1 expression as well. These data corroborated earlier experimental findings by Palma et al. that demonstrated a 20% downregulation of KCC2 and a twofold upregulation of NKCC1 mRNA in the subiculum, compared with the hippocampus proper or the temporal lobe neocortex, in patients with TLE associated with hippocampal MTS (9).
Huberfeld et al. examined the functional significance of altered CCC expression in TLE associated with hippocampal sclerosis. Similar to previous reports (9), in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry revealed down-regulation of KCC2 in subicular pyramidal neurons relative to adjacent hippocampal areas in diseased patients. Confirming the seminal findings by Cohen et al. (1), Huberfeld and colleagues found that GABAA-mediated IPSPs reversed at depolarizing values in greater than 20% of pyramidal neurons from patients with TLE; these neurons were anatomically and electrically similar to neighboring subicular neurons that displayed hyperpolarizing (inhibitory) GABAergic potentials. The authors combined electrophysiological recordings with biocytin-filled electrodes and KCC2 immunochemistry to demonstrate that all neurons that were hyperpolarized during interictal events stained positively for KCC2, whereas many (but not all) neurons that exhibited interictal depolarizations did not express KCC2. Most importantly, bumetanide, a loop diuretic related to furosemide that selectively blocks NKCC1 in the 5–10 μM range, produced a hyperpolarizing shift in reversal potentials of GABAA receptor currents and suppressed epileptic activity in hippocampal slices from TLE patients over a period of about 30 minutes, a time consistent with that which is needed to re-establish a new intracellular steady state of chloride. These findings were reminiscent of an earlier study demonstrating that 1) GABAA reversal potentials—elicited in Xenopus oocytes by injecting subicular neuron cell membranes from TLE patients that harbored GABAA receptors and CCCs—were more depolarized compared with the reversal potentials of GABAA receptor currents elicited in membranes derived from the temporal neocortex or hippocampus proper of these same patients and 2) bumetanide was able to shift these depolarizing GABAA receptor current reversal potentials to more negative values (9).
Together, these data suggest that a decrease in the functional activity of the chloride extruder KCC2, along with the concurrent presence of a robustly active chloride entry pathway via NKCC1, creates a chloride equilibrium potential within subicular neurons and the subicular/CA1 transitional area that is much more positive than the resting membrane potential. This renders GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission depolarizing (and thus potentially excitatory) as a result of the passive efflux of chloride through the GABAA receptor chloride ion channel. These depolarizing discharges could serve as pacemakers that generate seizures after currents spread to adjacent hippocampal tissue. Excitatory GABAergic signaling also would help explain why anticonvulsants that promote GABA release or enhance the GABAA receptor chloride current (e.g., benzodiazpines and barbiturates) are often ineffective or even detrimental to patients with TLE. Not surprisingly, the futility of GABA agonists is seen as well with neonatal seizures, in which a high expression of NKCC1 relative to KCC2—a phenomenon typical of early cortical development—also exists. Consistent with the underlying pathophysiology of NKCC1 overactivity in the disorder, bumetanide quells epileptic activity in mouse models of neonatal seizures (4,5).
A question left open is the nature of the interaction between NKCC1 and KCC2. While both studies clearly indicate that most neurons express both proteins, these are high capacity transporters that, if oppositely directed, have the potential to burn through millimolar concentrations of chloride, sodium, and potassium (and therefore ATP!) every second. To maintain cellular energetics, a more sophisticated mechanism than a chloride tug of war must be operative. Understanding how the activities of these transporters are regulated may illuminate a related question: is altered CCC expression/activity a cause of or a secondary consequence of TLE that is associated with hippocampal sclerosis? Investigation into the complex mechanisms that regulate the activity of the CCCs, such as phosphorylation by the chloride-sensitive WNK/SPAK kinase complex, is needed to answer this question (10). Perhaps seizures themselves produce long-term depolarizing shifts in GABAA receptor current reversal potentials by triggering activity-dependent downregulation of KCC2. Sustained epileptic activity in hippocampal slices downregulates KCC2 in CA1 pyramidal neurons, an effect mediated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor acting on the tyrosine receptor kinase B (11). Downregulation of the tyrosine phosphorylation and activity of KCC2 also is seen after neuronal trauma (12). In both TLE and neurotrauma, injured neurons appear to revert to an immature neuronal pattern of CCC expression and associated depolarizing GABAergic currents (13). While excitatory GABAergic neurotransmission during development and after trauma leads to the activation of voltage-gated calcium channels and subsequent increases in intracellular calcium that play a role in neuronal growth, maturation, and repair (13), such excitatory GABA neurotransmission likely propagates seizure activity in TLE.
It seems that the time is ripe to translate these basic scientific findings into clinical practice. Bumetanide is a drug that has been used for over 30 years with minimal side effects, has well-known pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and exhibits a lipid:water partition coefficient of approximately 4:1 at physiological pH, supporting the idea that this drug is capable of crossing the blood–brain barrier (4,5). The specific and robust effects of bumetanide on seizure activity (4,5) indicates that this drug could be explored in clinical trials as a potential treatment not only for neonatal seizures but also for TLE associated with hippocampal sclerosis, particularly for patients whose clinical and molecular phenotype mimics that of seizures in neonates. Furthermore, if a human trial of bumetanide as an anticonvulsant is to be initiated, it seems that a prudent place to begin would be in adults with medically intractable and surgically nonresectable TLE that is associated with hippocampal sclerosis.
