In contemporary urban and rural America there is a social process separate and distinct from gentrification: social preservation. Social preservation is the culturally motivated choice of certain people, who tend to be highly educated and residentially mobile, to live in the central city or small town in order to live in authentic social space, embodied by the sustained presence of old‐timers. Social preservationists view old‐timers as indispensable to preserving a pristine “social wilderness” and as arbiters of authentic community. For this reason, they engage in efforts to limit the displacement of those original residents they deem to be truly authentic. Ethnographic data from two Chicago neighborhoods and two small Massachusetts towns describes and analyzes the ethic and practice of social preservation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonE.1990. Streetwise: Race, Class, and Change in an Urban Community. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press.
2.
ChristensonJ. A.1984. “Geimenschaft and Gesellschaft: Testing the Spatial and Community Hypotheses,” Social Forces63(1),160–168.
3.
DavilaA.2001. Latinos, Inc.: The Marketing and Making of a People. Berkeley , CA : University of California Press.
4.
Di LeonardoM.1998. Exotics at Home: Anthropologies, Others, American Modernity. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press.
5.
Eight Forty Eight.2002.Interview with Maxwell Street Activist. Available athttp://www.wbez.org.
6.
EtzioniA.1996. “The Responsive Community: A Communitarian Perspective,” American Sociological Review61(1),1–11.
7.
FantasiaR.1988. Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action and Contemporary American Workers. Berkeley , CA : University of California Press.
8.
FloridaR. L.2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York : Basic Books.
9.
GrazianD.2003. Blue Chicago: The Search for Authenticity in Chicago Blues Clubs. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press.
10.
GoldbergL.1991. Here on This Hill: Conversations with Vermont Neighbors. Marshfield , VT : Vermont Folklife Center.
11.
GreenhouseC. J.YngressonB.EngelD. M.1994. Law and Community in Three American Towns. Ithaca , NY : Cornell University Press.
12.
HummonD. M.1990. Commonplaces: Community Ideology and Identity in American Culture. Albany , NY : State University of New York .
13.
HunterA.1974. Symbolic Communities: The Persistence and Change of Chicago's Local Community. Chicago , IL : Chicago University Press.
14.
HunterA.1975. “The Loss of Community: An Empirical Test Through Replication,” American Sociological Review40(5),537–552.
15.
LamontM.1992. Money, Morals and Manners. Chicago , IL : University of Chicago Press.
16.
LiptonS. G.1977. “Evidence of Central City Revival,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners43,136–147.
17.
LloydR.2002. “Neo‐Bohemia: Art and Neighborhood Redevelopment in Chicago,” Journal of Urban Affairs24(5),517–532.
18.
LoganJ. R.MolotchH. L.1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley , CA : University of California Press.
19.
LongL. H.1980. “ Back to the Countryside and Back to the City in the Same Decade,”in S. Laska and D. Spain (eds.), Back to the City: Issues in Neighborhood Renovation, pp.61–76. New York : Pergamon Press.
20.
LongL.DeAreD .1980. Migration to Metropolitan Areas: Appraising the Trends and Reasons for Moving. Washington , DC : U.S. Department of Commerce .
21.
MeleC.2000. Selling the Lower East Side: Culture, Real Estate and Resistance in New York City. Minneapolis , MN : University of Minnesota Press.
22.
The Onion
.2001. “Resident of Three Years Decries Neighborhood's Recent Gentrification”June 20.
23.
PutnamR.2000. Bowling Alone. New York : Simon & Schuster.
24.
RuncimanW. G. (ed.).1978. Weber: Selections in Translation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
25.
SmithN.1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. Unpublished.
26.
SolnitR.SchwartzenbergS.2000. Hollow City. New York : Verso .
27.
SpainD.1980. “ Indicators of Urban Revitalization: Racial and Socioeconomic Changes in Central‐City Housing,”in S. Laska and D. Spain (eds.), Back to the City: Issues in Neighborhood Renovation, pp.27–41. New York : Pergamon Press.
28.
SpainD.1993. “Been‐Heres Versus Come‐Heres: Negotiating Conflicting Community Identities,” Journal of the American Planning Association59(2),156–171.
29.
U.S. Census Bureau.2000.DP‐2. Profile of Selected Social Characteristics: 2000.http://www.census.gov.
30.
WarnerW. L.1959. The Living and the Dead: A Study of the Symbolic Life of Americans. Westport , CT : Greenwood Press.
31.
ZukinS.1987. “Gentrification: Culture and Capital in the Urban Core,” Annual Review of Sociology13,129–147.
32.
ZukinS.1995. The Cultures of Cities. Cambridge : Blackwell Publishers.
