Territorial accommodation in the management of ethnic conflict, while widely practised, has also been the subject of much academic debate which has failed to reach a conclusive verdict on its utility to contribute to sustainable conflict settlements. Reviewing three recent volumes on the role of institutions in conflict management processes, I focus on their central argument in relation to the question of whether territorial accommodation is a viable strategy for conflict management. While none of the volumes offers a conclusion to the debate over the merits of territorial approaches, they all provide sophisticated answers to some of the key questions continuously raised in this debate and all have significant potential to inform its policy dimension and to shape future research.
BermeoN. (2002) ‘The Import of Institutions’, Journal of Democracy, 13 (2), 96–110.
2.
BrancatiD. (2009) Peace by Design: Managing Intrastate Conflict through Decentralization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BrownM. E. (ed.) (1996) The International Dimensions of Internal Conflict. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
4.
ChoudhryS. (ed.) (2008) Constitutional Design for Divided Societies: Integration or Accommodation?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
CohenF. S. (1997) ‘Proportional versus Majoritarian Ethnic Conflict Management in Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 30 (5), 607–30.
6.
CordellK.WolffS. (2009) Ethnic Conflict: Causes, Consequences and Responses. Cambridge: Polity.
7.
CornellS. E. (2002) ‘Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective’, World Politics, 54 (2), 245–76.
8.
FearonJ. D.LaitinD. D. (1999) ‘Weak States, Rough Terrain, and Large-Scale Ethnic Violence since 1945’. Paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA, September 1999 [online]. Available from: http://www.stanford.edu/~jfearon/papers/insurg1.pdf [Accessed 10 February 2010].
9.
GurrT. R. (1993) Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
10.
HaleH. E. (2000) ‘The Parade of Sovereignties: Testing Theories of Secession in the Soviet Setting’, British Journal of Political Science, 30 (1), 31–56.
11.
HaleH. E. (2004) ‘Divided We Stand: Institutional Sources of Ethnofederal State Survival and Collapse’, World Politics, 56 (2), 165–93.
12.
HarffB.GurrT. R. (2004) Ethnic Conflict in World Politics. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
13.
HartzellC. A.HoddieM. (2007) Crafting Peace: Power-Sharing Institutions and the Negotiated Settlement of Civil Wars. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
14.
HorowitzD. L. (2007) ‘The Many Uses of Federalism’, Drake Law Review, 55 (4), 953–66.
15.
JenneE.SaidemanS. M.LoweW. (2007) ‘Separatism as a Bargaining Posture: The Role of Leverage in Minority Radicalization’, Journal of Peace Research, 44 (5), 539–58.
16.
KaufmannC. (1996) ‘Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars’, International Security, 20 (4), 136–75.
17.
LevyJ. S. (2001) ‘Theories of Interstate and Intrastate War: A Levels-of-Analysis Approach’, in CrockerC.HampsonF. O.AallP. (eds), Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, pp. 3–27.
18.
QuinnD. (2008) ‘Self-Determination Movements and Their Outcomes’, in HewittJ. J.WilkenfeldJ.GurrT.R. (eds), Peace and Conflict 2008. Boulder CO: Paradigm Publishers, pp. 33–8.
19.
RoederP. G. (1991) ‘Soviet Federalism and Ethnic Mobilization’, World Politics, 43 (2), 196–232.
20.
RoederP. G. (2007) Where Nation-States Come From: Institutional Change in the Age of Nationalism. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
SaidemanS.M.AyresR.W. (2000) ‘Determining the Causes of Irredentism: Logit Analyses of Minorities at Risk Data from the 1980s and 1990s’, Journal of Politics, 62 (4), 1126–44.
22.
SaidemanS. M.LanoueD. J.CampenniM.StantonS. (2002) ‘Democratization, Political Institutions, and Ethnic Conflict: A Pooled Time-Series Analysis, 1985–98’, Comparative Political Studies, 35 (1), 103–29.
23.
SchneckenerU. (2002) ‘Making Power Sharing Work: Lessons from Successes and Failures in Ethnic Conflict Regulation’, Journal of Peace Research, 39 (2), 203–28.
24.
SingerJ. D. (1961) ‘The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations’, World Politics, 14 (1), 77–92.
25.
ToftM. (2003) The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
ToftM.SaidemanS. M. (2010) ‘Self-Determination Movements and Their Outcomes’, in HewittJ. J.WilkenfeldJ.GurrT. R. (eds), Peace and Conflict 2008. Boulder CO: Paradigm Publishers, pp. 39–50.
27.
TreismanD. S. (1997) ‘Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order’, World Politics, 49 (2), 212–49.
28.
WalterB. F. (2003) ‘Explaining the Intractability of Territorial Conflict’, International Studies Review, 5 (4), 137–53.
29.
WhitmanR. G.WolffS. (2010) ‘The EU as a Conflict Manager: The Case of Georgia and Its Implications’, International Affairs, 86 (1), 87–107.
30.
WolffS. (2002) Disputed Territories: The Transnational Dynamics of Ethnic Conflict Settlement. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
31.
WolffS. (2003) ‘The Limits of Non-military International Intervention: A Case Study of the Kosovo Conflict’, in BieberF.DaskalovskiZ. (eds), Understanding the War in Kosovo. London: Frank Cass, pp. 79–100.
32.
WolffS. (2008) ‘Learning the Lessons of Ethnic Conflict Management? Conditional Recognition and International Administration in the Western Balkans since the 1990s’, Nationalities Papers, 36 (3), 553–71.
33.
WolffS. (2009) ‘Complex Power-Sharing and the Centrality of Territorial Self-Governance in Contemporary Conflict Settlements’, Ethnopolitics, 8 (1), 27–45.
