AlmondG. (1990) A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
2.
AlmondG. (1996) ‘Political Science: The History of The Discipline’, in GoodinR. E.KlingemannH. (eds), The New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 50–96.
3.
Aristotle (1976 [350 BCE]) The Nichomachean Ethics, translated by ThompsonJ.A.K., revised with notes and appendices by Hugh Tredennick, introduction and bibliography by Jonathan Barnes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
4.
AxelrodR. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BellahR. N. (1985) Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
6.
BourdieuP. (1998) Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: New York Press.
7.
BradyH.CollierD. (eds) (2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
BrownW. (1995) States of Inquiry: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
CaterinoB.SchramS. F. (2006) ‘Introduction: Reframing the Debate’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 1–13.
10.
CleggS. (2006) ‘The Bounds of Rationality’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 171–88.
11.
CruikshankB. (1999) The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
FayB. (1975) Social Theory and Political Practice. London: Allen & Unwin.
13.
FennoR. (1978) Homestyle: House Members in their Districts. New York: Harper Collins.
14.
FeyerabendP. (1975) Against Method. London: NLB.
15.
FlyvbjergB. (2001) Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FlyvbjergB. (2006) ‘A Perestroikan Straw Man Answers Back: David Laitin and Phronetic Social Science’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 56–85.
17.
FoucaultM. (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.
18.
FoucaultM. (1980) Introduction: The History of Sexuality, Vol. I. New York: Vintage.
19.
GeertzC. (1973) ‘Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight’, in GeertzC., The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, pp. 412–54.
20.
GeorgeA. L.BennettA. (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HackingI. (1995) Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Science of Memory. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
HarveyN. (1998) The Chiapas Rebellion: The Struggle for Land and Democracy. Raleigh NC: Duke University Press.
23.
HawkesworthM. (2006) ‘Contesting the Terrain: Flyvbjerg on Facts, Value, Knowledge and Power’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 152–70.
24.
HempelC. G. (1966) Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
25.
JacksonP.T. (2006) ‘A Statistician Strikes Out: In Defense of Genuine Methodological Diversity’, in SchramS.F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 86–97.
26.
KaszaG. J. (2006) ‘Unearthing the Roots of Hard Science: A Program for Graduate Students’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 222–33.
27.
KettlerD. (2006) ‘Political Science and Political Theory: The Heart of the Matter’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 234–51.
28.
KingG.KeohaneR. O.VerbaS. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
KuhnT. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
LaitinD. (2006) ‘The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 33–55.
31.
LandmanT. (2000) Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics. London: Routledge.
32.
LandmanT. (2001) ‘Book Note on Flyvbjerg, B. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again;.
33.
MonroeAlan D. (2000) Essentials of Political Research’, Political Studies, 49 (5), 1014.
34.
LandmanT. (2002) ‘Comparative Politics and Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 24 (November), 890–923.
35.
LandmanT. (2003) Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics, second Edition. London: Routledge.
36.
LandmanT. (2005) ‘The Political Science of Human Rights’, British Journal of Political Science, 35 (3), 549–72.
37.
LandmanT. (2006) Studying Human Rights. Oxford: Routledge.
38.
LandmanT. (2008) Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics, third Edition. London: Routledge.
39.
LukeT.W. (2006) ‘Finding New Mainstreams: Perestroika, Phronesis, and Political Science in the United States’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 252–68.
40.
PayneL. (2000) Uncivil Movements: The Armed Right Wing and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41.
PutnamR. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
SchatzkiT. (2006) ‘Social Science in Society’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 117–33.
43.
Schwartz-SheaP. (2006) ‘Conundrums in the Practice of Pluralism’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 209–21.
44.
ScottJ. (1976) The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
45.
ScottJ. (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
46.
ShdaimahC. S.StahlR. W. (2006) ‘Reflections on Doing Phronetic Social Science: A Case Study’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 98–116.
47.
TarrowS. (1989) Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965–1975.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
48.
ThieleL. P. (2006) ‘Making Intuition Matter’, in SchramS. F.CaterinoB. (eds), Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Methods. New York: New York University Press, pp. 188–208.