Retaining the Peers: How Peer Review Triumphs over League Tables and Faulty Accounting in the Assessment of Political Science Research

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Butler

McAllister

(2009) ‘Metrics or Peer Review? Evaluating the 2001 UK Research Assessment Exercise in Political Science’, Political Studies Review, 7 (1), 3–17.

Corbyn

(2008) ‘REF could Leave Universities with “Huge” Bill, Expert Warns', Times Higher Education [online], 8 May. Available from: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp_storyCode=401818&sectioncode=26 [Accessed 1 September 2008].

Fox

(2005) ‘Linear Models, Problems’, in Kempf-Leonard

(ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 515–22.

Higher Education Funding Council of England (HEFCE) (2007) Research Excellence Framework. Available from: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2007/07_34/ [Accessed 1 September 2008].

Hix

(2004) ‘A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments’, Political Studies Review, 2 (2), 293–313.

McLean

Blais

Garand

J. C.

Giles

(2009) ‘Comparative Journal Ratings: A Survey Report’, Political Studies Review, 7 (1), 18–38.

Sigelman

(2007) ‘Report of the Editor of the American Political Science Review, 2005–2006’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 40 (2), 427–9.

Van Raan

A. F. J.

Moed

H. F.

Van Leeuwen

T. N.

, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University (2007) Scoping Study on the Use of Bibliometric Analysis to Measure the Quality of Research in UK Higher Education Institutions: Report to HEFCE. Available from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2007/rd18_07/ [Accessed 1 September 2008].