Despite widespread changes in occupational opportunities, men and women continue to show divergent preferences for careers. This research invoked a motivational framework to explain sex-differentiated career interest. From a role congruity perspective (Diekman & Eagly, 2008), the internalization of gender roles leads people to endorse gender-stereotypic goals, which then lead to interest in occupations that afford the pursuit of those goals. Three studies provided evidence for the hypotheses. Study 1 found that male-and female-stereotypic careers were perceived to afford different goals. Studies 2 and 3 found that men and women endorsed different goals and that this gender-normative goal endorsement predicted gender-stereotypic career interest. In addition, structural equation modeling (Study 3) indicated that internalization of gender roles fully accounted for sex-differentiated goal endorsement. These findings thus extend the social role theory framework to consider processes related to self-selection into specific social roles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence; an essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
3.
BrowneK. R. (2006). Evolved sex differences and occupational segregation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27,143–162.
4.
BusseyK.BanduraA. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.
5.
ButtonS. B. (2001). Organizational efforts to affirm sexual diversity: A cross-level examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 17–28.
6.
CarverP. R.YungerJ. L.PerryD. G. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 49, 95–109.
7.
CostaP. T.Jr.TerraccianoA.McCraeR. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.
8.
DeauxK.LaFranceM. (1998). Gender. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 788–827). New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
DeauxK.MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.
10.
DiekmanA. B.EaglyA. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.
11.
DiekmanA. B.EaglyA. H. (2008). Of men, women, and motivation: A role congruity account. In ShahJ. Y.GardnerW. L. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 434–447). New York: Guilford.
12.
DiekmanA. B.HirniseyL. (2007). The effect of context on the silver ceiling: A role congruity perspective on prejudiced responses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1353–1366.
13.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.DiekmanA. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In EckesT.TrautnerH. M. (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
EaglyA. H.WoodW.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C. (2003). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: Implications for the partner preferences of women and men In EaglyA. H.BeallA. E.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 269–295). New York: Guilford.
15.
EcclesJ. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.
16.
EganS. K.PerryG. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463.
17.
FullertonH. N.Jr. (1999). Labor force participation: 75 years of change, 1950–98 and 1998–2025. Monthly Labor Review, 122, 3–12.
18.
GabrielS.GardnerL. (1999). Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642–655.
19.
GatiI.OsipowS. H.GivonM. (1995). Gender differences in career decision making: The content and structure of preferences. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 204–216.
20.
GlickP. (1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25, 351–378.
21.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
22.
GlickP.FiskeT. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
23.
GottfredsonL. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545–579.
24.
Guerrero WittM.WoodW. (2007). Self-regulation of gendered behavior in everyday life. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University.
25.
HeilmanM. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.
26.
JenkinsS. R. (1987). Need for achievement and women's careers over 14 years: Evidence for occupational structure effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 922–932.
27.
Johannesen-SchmidtM. C.EaglyA. H. (2002). Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 322–328.
JuddP. C.OswaldA. (1997). Employment desirability: The interactive effects of gender-typed profile, stimulus sex, and gender-typed occupation. Sex Roles, 37, 467–476.
30.
KonradA. M.RitchieJ. E.LiebP.CorrigallE. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593–641.
31.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). San Diego, CA, Academic Press.
32.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994).Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
33.
LippaR. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996–1009.
34.
MargolisJ.FisherA. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
MarkusH.NuriusP. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
36.
MorganC.IsaacJ. D.SansoneC. (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, 44, 295–320.
37.
PohlmannK. (2001). Agency- and communion-orientation in life goals: Impacts on goal pursuit strategies and psychological well-being. In SchmuckP.SheldonK. M. (Eds.), Life goals and well-being: Towards a positive psychology of human striving (pp. 68–84). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
38.
PrenticeD. A.CarranzaE. (2002). What women should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281.
39.
RobertsB. W.RobinsR. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1284–1296.
40.
SchwartzS. H.RubelT. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028.
41.
ShahJ. Y.KruglanskiA. W.FriedmanR. (2003). Goal systems theory: Integrating the cognitive and motivational aspects of self-regulation. In SpencerS. J.FeinS.ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 9, pp. 247–275). Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum.
42.
SidaniusJ.van LaarC.LevinS.SinclairS. (2003). Social hierarchy maintenance and assortment into social roles: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes and Inter-group Relations, 6, 333–352.
43.
SpainD.BianchiS. M. (1996). Balancing act: Motherhood, marriage, and employment among American women. New York: Sage.
44.
Tomaskovic-DeveyD. (1993). Gender and racial inequality at work: The sources and consequences of job segregation. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
WoodWChristensenP. N.HeblM. R.RothgerberH. (1997). Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect, and the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 523–535.
47.
WoodW.EaglyH. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.
