This study provides evidence that the effects of perceived pervasive discrimination may be dynamic over time. It was expected that participants who perceived discrimination to be highly pervasive would initially be more likely to engage in inactive coping strategies than those who perceived low pervasiveness; however, those who continued to perceive high pervasiveness over time were expected ultimately to engage in more active strategies than those perceiving low pervasiveness. Using a 28-day diary, women and ethnic minorities described their daily experiences of discrimination and indicated their appraisals of its pervasiveness as well as their coping strategies. Results showed that participants who initially perceived low pervasiveness reported more active coping and religion use as well as less behavioral disengagement than those initially perceiving high pervasiveness. However, this pattern was reversed by the end of the study. Implications for integrating time into the assessment of coping with discrimination are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
3.
BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T.HarveyR. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African-Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149.
4.
ByrneB. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CarverC. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92–100.
6.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.
7.
ContradaR. J.AshmoreR. D.GaryM. L.CoupsE.EgethJ. D.SewellA. (2001). Measures of ethnic related stress: Psychometric properties, ethnic group differences, and associations with well-being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1775–1820.
8.
CrosbyF. J. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386.
9.
CrossW. E.Jr. (1978). The Thomas and Cross models of psychological nigrescence: A review. Journal of Black Psychology, 5, 13–31.
10.
DeLongisA.HemphillK. J.LehmanD. R. (1992). A structured diary methodology for the study of daily events. In BryantF. B. (Eds.), Methodological issues in applied social psychology. Social psychological applications to social issues (Vol. 2, pp. 83–109). New York: Plenum.
11.
DowningN. E.RouschK. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counselling Psychologist, 13, 695–709.
12.
DriefusC. (1973). Women's fate: Rap from a feminist consciousness-raising group. New York: Bantam.
13.
EcclestonC. P.MajorB. N. (2006). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: The role of group identification and appraisals. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 147–162.
14.
Employment and Immigration Canada. (1987). Employment Equity Act, regulations and schedules (WH3–629). Ottawa, Canada.
15.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150–170.
16.
FosterM. D. (2001). The motivational quality of global attributions in hypothetical and experienced situations of gender discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 242–253.
17.
FosterM. D. (2005, June). Coping with discrimination: Differences between white and visible minority women. Paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association Convention, Montreal, Quebec.
18.
FosterM. D.DionK. L. (2003). Dispositional hardiness and women's well-being relating to gender discrimination: The role of minimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 197–208.
19.
FosterM. D.JacksonC. L.HartmannR.WoulfeS. (2004). Minimizing the pervasiveness of women's personal experiences of gender discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 224–232.
20.
FosterM. D.MathesonK. (1995). Double relative deprivation: Combining the personal and political. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1167–1177.
21.
FosterM. D.TsarfatiE. M. (2005). The motivational quality of shattered assumptions when responding to an acute experience of gender discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1730–1738.
22.
GillR.MathesonK. (2006). Responses to discrimination: The role of emotion and expectations for emotional regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 32, 149–161.
23.
GurinP.MarkusH. (1989). Cognitive consequences of gender identity. In SkevingtonS.BakerD. (Eds.), The social identity of women (pp. 152–172). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality, theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.
25.
KaiserC. R.MajorB.McCoyS. K. (2004). Expectations about the future and the emotional consequences of perceiving prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 173–184.
26.
KaiserC. R.MillerC. T. (2004). A stress and coping perspective on confronting abstract sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 168–178.
LandrineH.KlonoffE. A.CorralI.FernandezS.RoeschS. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring ethnic discrimination in health research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 79–94.
29.
LandrineH.KlonoffE. A.GibbsJ.ManningV.LundM. (1995). Physical and psychiatric correlates of gender discrimination: An application of the schedule of sexist events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 473–492.
30.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
31.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318.
32.
MaletteL.ChalouhM. (Eds.). (1991). The Montreal massacre. Charlottetown, Canada: Gynergy Books.
33.
MathesonK.GillR.KellyO.AnismanH. (2007). Cortisol and cardiac reactivity in the context of sex discrimination: The moderating effects of mood and perceived control. Manuscript under review.
34.
McClellandG. H.JuddC. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.
35.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2003). Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1005–1017.
36.
McCraeR. R. (1990). Controlling neuroticism in the measurement of stress. Stress Medicine, 6, 237–241.
37.
Mendoza-DentonR.DowneyG.PurdieV. J.DavisA.PietrzakJ. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students' college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896–918.
38.
ParkC. L., (2005). Religion as meaning-making framework in coping with life stress. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 707–730.
39.
ParkC. L.ArmeliS.TennenH. (2004). Appraisal-coping goodness of fit: A daily internet study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 558–569.
40.
PorterL. S.StoneA. A. (1996). An approach to assessing daily coping. In ZeidnerM.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research and applications (pp. 133–150). New York: Wiley.
41.
RomeroA. J.RobertsR. E. (2003). The impact of multiple dimensions of ethnic identity on discrimination and adolescents' self-esteem. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2288–2305.
42.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.KobrynowiczD.OwenS. (2002). Perceiving discrimination against one's gender group has different implications for well-being in women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 197–210.
43.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.PostmesT. (2003). Women's emotional responses to the pervasiveness of gender discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–12.
44.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
46.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.
47.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FitzgeraldD. C.BylsmaW. H. (2003). African American college students' experiences with everyday racism: Characteristics of and responses to these incidents. Journal of Black Psychology, 29, 38–67.
48.
TougasF.VeilleuxF. (1990). The response of men to affirmative action strategies for women: The study of a predictive model. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 22, 424–432.
49.
TroppL. R.BrownA. C. (2004). What benefits the group can also benefit the individual: Group-enhancing and individual-enhancing motives for collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 267–282.
50.
YipT. (2005). Sources of situational variation in ethnic identity and psychological well-being: A Palm Pilot study of Chinese American students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1603–1616.
