Healing or Hurtful: Sexual Assault Survivors' Interpretations of Social Reactions from Support Providers

Abstract

Sexual assault survivors often receive both positive and negative reactions to the disclosure of their assault. Although positive reactions are typically more common from informal support providers and negative reactions are typically more common from formal support providers, not all formal and informal support providers react the same way. To help clarify the nature of social reactions received from specific support providers, 103 female sexual assault survivors participated in interviews about their disclosure experiences. These interviews resulted in detailed descriptions of 250 disclosure interactions. Results indicated that counselors and friends engaged in the most emotional support, fairly high levels of tangible aid, and fairly low levels of most types of negative reactions. Romantic partners provided only moderate support, the lowest amount oftangible aid, and the highest amount of blame, control, and egocentric behaviors. Romantic partners also treated survivors differently more often than other support providers. Qualitative analysis of survivors' descriptions of these reactions are used to help interpret survivors' ratings of reactions as healing or hurtful.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahrens

Campbell

(2000). Assisting sexual assault victims as they recover from sexual assault: The impact on friends. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 959–986.

Ahrens

Campbell

Ternier-Thames

Wasco

Sefl

(2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of sexual assault survivors' first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 38–49.

Borja

S. E.

Callahan

J. L.

Long

P. J.

(2006). Positive and negative adjustment and social support of sexual assault survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19, 905–914.

Campbell

Ahrens

C. E.

Sefl

Wasco

S. M.

Barnes

H. E.

(2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims: Healing and hurtful effects on psychological and physical health outcomes. Violence and Victims, 16, 287–302.

Campbell

Sefl

Wasco

S. M.

Ahrens

C. E.

(2004). Doing community research without a community: Creating safe space for sexual assault survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 253–261.

Cortina

L. M.

(2004). Hispanic perspectives on sexual harassment and social support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 570–584.

Davis

R.C.

Brickman

(1996). Supportive and unsupportive aspects of the behavior of others toward victims of sexual and nonsexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 250–262.

Davis

R. C.

Brickman

Baker

(1991). Supportive and unsupportive responses of others to sexual assault victims: Effects on concurrent victim adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 443–451.

Emm

McKenry

P. C.

(1988). Coping with victimization: The impact of sexual assault on female survivors, male significant others, and parents. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 10, 272–279.

10.

Filipas

H. H.

Ullman

S. E.

(2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims from various support sources. Violence and Victims, 16, 673–692.

11.

Fisher

B. S.

Daigle

L. E.

Cullen

F. T.

Turner

M. G.

(2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 6–38.

12.

Golding

J. M.

Siegel

J. M.

Sorenson

S. B.

Burnam

M. A.

(1989). Social support sources following sexual assault. Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 92–107.

13.

Herbert

T. B.

Dunkel-Schetter

(1992). Negative social reactions to victims: An overview of responses and their determinants. In Montada

Filipp

Lerner

M. J.

(Eds.), Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 497–518). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

14.

Koss

M. P.

Dinero

T. E.

Seibel

C. A.

Cox

S. L.

(1988). Stranger and acquaintance sexual assault: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24.

15.

Miles

Huberman

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Sheldon

Parent

(2002). Clergy's attitudes and attributions of blame toward female rape victims. Violence Against Women, 8, 233–256.

17.

Smith

M. E.

(2005). Female sexual assault: The impact on the male significant other. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 26, 149–167.

18.

Starzynski

L. L.

Ullman

S. E.

Filipas

H. H.

Townsend

(2005). Correlates of women's sexual assault disclosure to informal and formal support sources. Violence and Victims, 20, 417–432.

19.

Sudderth

L. K.

(1998). “It'll come right back at me”: The interactional context of discussing sexual assault with others. Violence Against Women, 4, 572–594.

20.

Testa

VanZile-Tamsen

Livingston

J. A.

Koss

M. P.

(2004). Assessing women's experiences of sexual aggression using the sexual experiences survey: Evidence for validity and implications for research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 256–265.

21.

Ullman

S. E.

(1996). Do social reactions to sexual assault victims vary by support provider? Violence and Victims, 11, 143–157.

22.

Ullman

S. E.

(1999). Social support and recovery from sexual assault: A review. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 4, 343–358.

23.

Ullman

S. E.

(2000). Psychometric characteristics of the Social Reactions Questionnaire: A measure of reactions to sexual assault victims. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 257–271.

24.

Ullman

S. E.

Filipas

H. H.

(2001). Correlates of formal and informal support seeking in sexual assault victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1028–1047.

25.

Yoshioka

M. R.

Gilbert

El-Bassel

Baig-Amin

(2003). Social support and disclosure of abuse: Comparing South Asian, African American, and Hispanic battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 171–180.